The effect of using Filtered Containment Venting System on variation in dose with distance in the prompt accident consequence assessment

References

• McKenna TJ. Protective action recommendations based upon plant conditions. J Hazard Mater. 2000;75:145–164. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00177-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna TJ, Trefethen J, Gant K, et al. Response technical manual: RTM-96, Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1996, (NUREG/BR-0150) Volume 1, Revision 4.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Manual of protective action guides and protective actions for nuclear incidents. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2017. (EPA-400/R-17/001).
   Google Scholar
• Carless TS, Talabi SM, Fischbeck PS. Risk and regulatory considerations for small modular reactor emergency planning zones based on passive decontamination potential. Energy. 2019;167:740–756. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrakos D. Radiological impact and emergency zones for small iPWR with different approaches for source term calculation. Prog Nucl Energy. 2022;145:104123. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulimoen M, Berge E, Klein H et al. Comparing model skills for deterministic versus ensemble dispersion modelling: The Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident as a case study. Sci Total Environ. 2022;806:150128. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niisoe T. An iterative application of the green’s function approach to estimate the time variation in 137Cs release to the atmosphere from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power Station. Atmos Environ. 2021;254:118380. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsdell JV, Athey GF, McGuire SA, et al. RASCAL 4: description of models and methods. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2012. (NUREG-1940).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Zhang L, Tong J. Development of rapid atmospheric source term estimation system for AP1000 nuclear power plant. Prog Nucl Energy. 2015;81:264–275. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. Generic assessment procedures for determining protective actions during a reactor accident. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1997. (IAEA-TECDOC-955).
   Google Scholar
• Athey GF, Sjoreen AL, Ramsdell JV, et al. RASCAL version 2.1 user’s guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1994. (NUREG/CR-5247 Volume 1, Revision 2).
   Google Scholar
• Athey GF, Sjoreen AL, Ramsdell JV, et al. RASCAL version 2.1 workbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1994. (NUREG/CR-5247 Volume 2, Revision 2).
   Google Scholar
• Jacquemain D, Guentay S, Basu S, et al. OECD/NEA/CSNI status report on filtered containment venting. OECD/NEA;2014, (NEA-CSNI-R-2014-7)
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimgol H, Aghaie M. Evaluation of Filtered Containment Venting System (FCVS) effects on severe accident of a WWER1000 plant. Ann Nucl Energy. 2023;181:64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA, Preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2015, (IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS SERIES No. GSR Part 7)
   Google Scholar
• Dose estimates to be referred to in the formulation of nuclear emergency preparedness measures [Internet]. Japan: Nuclear Regulatory Authority;2018 Oct 17 [cited 2023 Jun 22] Available from: https://www.nra.go.jp/data/000249587.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risks in U.S. Commercial nuclear power plants, executive summary. Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1975. (WASH-1400).
   Google Scholar
• Soffer L, Burson SB, Ferrell CM, et al. Accident source terms for light-water nuclear power plants. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1995. (NUREG-1465).
   Google Scholar
• McKenna TJ, Giitter JG. Source term estimation during incident response to severe nuclear power plant accidents. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1988. (NUREG-1228).
   Google Scholar
• NSC. Meteorological guidelines for safety analysis of nuclear power reactor facilities [in Japanese]; 1982(revised in 2001)
   Google Scholar
• Atomic Energy Society of Japan. Code of practice for probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants (level 3 PRA version);2018. (AESJ-SC-P010:2018)
   Google Scholar
• McGuire SA, Ramsdell JV, Athey GF. RASCAL 3.0.5: description of models and methods. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2007. (NUREG-1887).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Severe accident risks: an assessment for five U.S. Nuclear power plants. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1990. (NUREG-1150, vol. 1).
   Google Scholar
• Nosek AJ, Bixler N. MACCS theory manual. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories; 2021. (SAND2021-11535).
   Google Scholar
• Sprung JL, Rollstin JA, Helton JC et al. Evaluation of severe accident risks: quantification of major input parameters. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories; 2021. (SAND86-1309, NUREG/CR-4551).
   Google Scholar
• Terms related to rain [internet]. Japan: Japan Meteorological Agency; [cited 2023 Jun 12] Available from: https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/kishou/know/yougo_hp/kousui.html
   Google Scholar
• Eckerman KF, Ryman JC. External exposure to radionuclides in air, water, and soil. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1993. (EPA-402-R-93-081).
   Google Scholar
• Eckerman KF, Wolbarst AB, Richardson ACB. Limiting values of radionuclide intake and air concentration and dose conversion factors for inhalation, submersion, and ingestion. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1988; (EPA-520/1-88-020).
   Google Scholar