The Impact of Exposure to Internet-Based Information About the Rorschach and the MMPI–2 on Psychiatric Outpatients’ Ability to Simulate Mentally Healthy Test Performance

References

• Alden, L., Wiggins, J.S., & Pincus, A.L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alliger, G.M., & Dwight, S.A. (2000). A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alliger, G.M., Lilienfeld, S.O., & Mitchell, K. (1996). The susceptibility of overt and covert integrity tests to coaching and faking. Psychological Science, 7, 32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J.G., & Lowenstein, R.J. (1990). Characteristics of patients with multiple personality and dissociative disorders on psychological testing. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 178, 448–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, R.A., & Miller, J. (2002). Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI–2: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 14, 16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, R.A., & Sckirnjak, G. (1997). Detection of underreporting on the MMPI–2 in clinical population: Effects of information about validity scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 555–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagby, R.M., Rogers, R., Buis, T., & Kalemba, V. (1994). Malingered and defensive response style on the MMPI–2: An examination of the validity scales. Assessment, 1, 31–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagby, R.M., Rogers, R., Nicholson, R.A., Buis, T., Seeman, M.V., & Rector, N.A. (1997). Does clinical training facilitate feigning schizophrenia on the MMPI–2? Psychological Assessment, 9, 106–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M. (1991). The Big-Five personality dimension and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y.S. (1994). The ethical dilemma of coached research. Psychological Assessment, 6, 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y.S., & Archer, R.P. (2008). The MMPI–2 and MMPI–A. In R.P. Archer & S.R. Smith (Eds.), Personality assessment (pp. 81–131). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D.T. R., Lamb, D.G., Wetter, M.W., Baer, R.A., & Widiger, T.A. (1994). Ethical considerations in research on coached malingering. Psychological Assessment, 6, 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R.F. (2007). Might the Rorschach be a projective test after all? Social projection of an undesired trait alters Rorschach oral dependency scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 354–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R.F. (2012). Rorschach score validation as a model for 21st-century personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 26–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J.N., Dahlstrom, W.G., Graham, J.R., Tellegen, A., & Kraemmer, B. (1989). Manual for the Restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI–2. An administration and interpretive guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. (2009, July 28). Has Wikipedia created a Rorschach cheat sheet? Analyze that. The New York Times, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J. (1949). Statistical methods applied to Rorschach scores. Psychological Bulletin, 46, 393–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, K.L., Viglione, D.J., Perry, W., & Meyer, G.J. (2007). A method to optimize the response range while maintaining Rorschach Comprehensive system validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, J.E., Sackett, P.R., & Hough, L.M. (1999). Social desirability correction in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erard, R.E. (2012). Expert testimony using the Rorschach performance. Psychological Injury and Law, 5, 122–134.
   Google Scholar
• Erdberg, P. (2008). Multimethod assessment as a forensic standard. In C.B. Gacono & F.B. Evans (Eds.), The handbook of forensic Rorschach assessment (pp. 561–566). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Exner, J.E., Jr. (1988). Problems with brief protocols. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 640–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exner, J.E., Jr. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. Vol. 1 (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gacono, C.B., & Meloy, J.R. (1994). The Rorschach assessment of aggreryive and psychopathic personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ganellen, R.J. (1994). Attempting to conceal psychological disturbance: MMPI defensive set and the Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 423–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganellen, R.J. (2008). Rorschach assessment of malingering and defensive response set. In C.B. Gacono & F.B. Evans (Eds.), The handbook of forensic Rorschach assessment (pp. 89–119). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ganellen, R.J. (2012). Integrating the Rorschach and the MMPI–2 in personality assessment. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. (. Original work published 1996)
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, L.S., Wasyliw, O.E., Benn, A.F., & Gyoerkoe, K.L. (2002). Can sex offenders who minimize on the MMPI conceal psychopathology on the Rorschach? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 484–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, E. (2001). The effect of Rorschach administration: A comparison of two instructions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 460–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, E., Grønnerød, C., Krog, D., Vanem, P.-C., & Høstmark Nielsen, G. (2003). Innføring i Rorschach-metodikk [Introduction to Rorschach methodology]. Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, E., & Vanem, P.-C. (2003). Rorschach administration: A comparison of the effect of two instructions given to an inpatient sample of drug addicts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 145–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, S.R., & McKinley, J.G. (1951). The MMPI manual. New York, NY: Psychological Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, T.P. (2005). 50 widely used psychological tests. In G. Koocher, J. Norcross, & S. Hill (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (pp. 1–735). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, L.M., Alden, L.E., Wiggins, J.S., & Pincus, A.1. (2000). IIP Inventory of Interpersonal Problems manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Meehl, P.E., & Hathaway, S.R. (1946). The K factor as a suppressor variable in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 525–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloy, J.R., & Gacono, C.B. (1992). The aggression response and the Rorschach. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 104–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G.J. (1997). On the integration of personality assessment methods: The Rorschach and MMPI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 297–330. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6802_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G.J., & Archer, R.P. (2001). The hard science of Rorschach research: What do we know and where do we go? Psychological Assessment, 13, 486–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G.J., Erdberg, P., & Shaffer, T.W. (2007). Toward international normative reference data for the Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(Suppl. 1), S201–S216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G.J., Hilsenroth, M.J., Baxter, D., Exner, J.E. Jr., Fowler, J.C., Piers, C.C., & Resnick, J. (2002). An examination of interrater reliability for scoring the Rorschach Comprehensive System in eight data sets. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 219–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G.J., Riethmiller, R.J., Brooks, R. D., Benoit, W.A., & Handler, L. (2000). A replication of Rorschach and MMPI–2 convergent validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 175–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G.J., & Viglione, D.J. (2008). An introduction to Rorschach assessment. In R.P. Archer & S.R. Smith (Eds.), Personality assessment (pp. 281–336). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, G.J., Viglione, D.J., & Exner, J.E. , Jr. (2001). Superiority of Form% over Lambda for research on Rorschach Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G.J., Viglione, D.J., Mihura, J.L., Erard, R.E., & Erdberg, P. (2011). Rorschach Performance Assessment System.Administration, coding, interpretation, and technical manual. Toledo, OH: Rorschach Performance Assessment System, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Mihura, J.L. (2012). The necessity of multiple test methods in conducting assessments. Psychological Injury and Law, 5, 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Mihura, J.L., Meyer, G.J., Dumitrascu, N., & Bombel, G. (2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of the Comprehensive System. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 548–605. doi:10.1037/a0029406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, G.G., & Kinder, B.N. (1990). The susceptibility of the Rorschach to malingering: A critical review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, W.A. E. (2010). Rorschach reliability with exposure to Internet-based images and information (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Professional School of Psychology, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (1997). Researching dissimulation. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 309–327). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rorschach, H. (1942). Psychodiagnostics. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton. (. Original work published 1921)
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, M.A., Drake, E.B., Glass, A., Marcotte, D., & van Gorp, W.G. (2002). Trying to beat the system: Misuse of the Internet to assist in avoiding the detection of psychological symptom dissimulation. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 33, 294–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schretlen, D. (1988). The use of psychological tests to identify malingered symptoms of mental disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 46, 451–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schretlen, D. (1997). Dissimulation on the Rorschach and other projective measures of psychometric assessment. In R. Richard (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 208–222). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, D.S., & Brabender, V.M. (2013). More challenges since Wikipedia: Effects of exposure to Internet information about the Rorschach on selected Comprehensive System variables. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, D.S., & Loving, J. (2012). Challenges since Wikipedia: The availability of Rorschach information online and Internet users’ reaction to online media coverage of the Rorschach–Wikipedia debate. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 73–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, K.W. (2008). Dissimulation on projective measures. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. 207–217). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Tett, R.P., Freund, K.A., Christiansen, N.D., Fox, K.E., & Coaster, J. (2012). Faking on self-report emotional intelligence and personality tests: Effects of faking opportunity, cognitive ability, and job-type. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, D., Towns, B., & Lindshield, D. (2012). Understanding and using the Rorschach inkblot test to assess post-traumatic conditions. Psychological Injury and Law, 5, 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D.S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakeability estimates: Between-subjects versus within-subjects designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasyliw, O.E., Benn, A.F., Grossman, L.S., & Haywood, T.W. (1998). Detecting of minimization of psychopathology on the Rorschach in cleric and noncleric alleged sex offenders. Assessment, 5, 389–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, I.B. (2003). Principles of Rorschach interpretations (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (2007). Personality diagnosis with the Shedler–Westen assessment procedure (SWAP): Integrating clinical and statistical measurement and prediction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 810–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, D.S., Van Rooy, D.L., Viswesvaran, C., & Alonso, A. (2008). The susceptibility of a mixed model measure of emotional intelligence to faking: A Solomon four-group design. Psychological Science Quarterly, 50, 44–63.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia. (2004, . July 22). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Multiphasic_Personality_Inventory
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia. (2010, . August 23). Rorschach test. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_test
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W. (1999). Rorschach validity in fake-good set: Ability of non-patients to conceal weakness. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Science and Engineering, 60(11-B), 5824.
   Google Scholar