Validation of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory–II (CEI–II) Among Chinese University Students in Hong Kong

References

• Acun, N., Kapıkıran, Ş., & Kabasakal, Z. (2013). Trait Curiosity and Exploration Inventory–II: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and its reliability. Türk Psikoloji Yazilari, 16(31), 74–90.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. K., Stolz, H. E., & Olsen, J. A. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70 (4, Serial No. 282).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 28, 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, F. B., & Satorra, A. (2012). Principles and practice of scaled difference chi-square testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 372–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Zhang, J., Leung, K., Leong, F., & Yeh, K. H. (2008). Relevance of openness as a personality dimension in Chinese culture: Aspects of its cultural relevance. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 39, 81–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. P., Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). The measurement of perceptual curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1127–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, D. A. (2011). Applying Silvia's model of interest to academic text: Is there a third appraisal? Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 624–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1992). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 132–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, S. Briggs, & J. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795–824). San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, P. M., Keller, H., Fuligni, A., & Maynard, A. (2003). Cultural pathways through universal development. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 461–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometika, 30, 179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, F. L. K. (1981). Americans and Chinese: Passage to differences (3rd ed.). Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, V., & Brdaric, D. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Evidence from subjective well-being in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 380–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S., Jr., Silvia, P. J., Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., … Keller, P. S. (2013). Curiosity protects against interpersonal aggression: Cross-sectional, daily process, and behavioral evidence. Journal of Personality, 81, 87–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., Gallagher, M. W., Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Breen, W. E., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. F. (2009). The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory–II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 987–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., McKnight, P. E., Fincham, F. D., & Rose, P. (2011). When curiosity breeds intimacy: Taking advantage of intimacy opportunities and transforming boring conversations. Journal of Personality, 79, 1369–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 291–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., & Steger, M. F. (2007). Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., & Yuen, M. (2007). Whether highly curious students thrive academically depends on perceptions about the school learning environment: A study of Hong Kong adolescents. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, J. A., & Silvia, P. J. (2006). The latent structure of trait curiosity: Evidence for interest and deprivation curiosity dimensions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 318–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 75–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longman, R. S., & Holden, R. R. (1992). PERM: A double-precision FORTRAN routine for obtaining parallel analysis eigenvalues from permuted data. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 24, 493.
   Google Scholar
• Mussel, P. (2013). Introducing the construct curiosity for predicting job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 453–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raykov, T., & Amemiya, Y. (2008). Testing time-invariance of variable specificity in repeated measure designs using structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 449–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., … Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. (2005). What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5, 89–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. (2008). Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 94–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Interesting things and curious people: Exploration and engagement as transient states and enduring strengths. Social Psychology and Personality Compass, 3, 785–797.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. (1980, May). Statistically based tests of the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar