Testing the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender of the Big Five Inventory Through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling

References

• American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L. R., & de Vries, R. E. (2009). Higher order factors of personality: Do they exist? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 79–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. (2010). The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The Big 5 Questionnaire: A new questionnaire to assess the 5 factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 281–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1978). Scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiorri, C., Ubbiali, A., & Donati, D. (2008, June). Can personality traits be reliably assessed with short measures? An Italian study on the shortened version of the Big Five Inventory-44. Paper presented at the 39th International Meeting of the Society for Research in Psychotherapy, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/carloskij/bfibarcelona08
   Google Scholar
• Church, A. T., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen's three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cid, J., & Finney, S. J. (2009, April). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Big Five Inventory. Paper presented at the 2009 American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., Smillie, L. D., & Corr, P. J. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Mini-IPIP Five-Factor Model personality scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 688–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI–R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1957). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danu, D. A. (2013). Uji Validitas Konstrukt Big Five Inventory dengan Pendekatan Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori. Ringkasan Skripsi. Tidak diterbitkan [Testing the construct validity of the Big Five Inventory through a confirmatory factor analysis approach] (Working Paper N. Z00). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Retrieved from https://id.scribd.com/doc/133344882/Uji-Validitas-Konstruk-Big-Five-Inventory-dengan-Pendekatan-Analisis-Faktor-Konfirmatori
   Google Scholar
• Denissen, J. J. A., Geenen, R., van Aken, M. A. G., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). Development and validation of a Dutch translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI), Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 152–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, C. V., Oort, F. J., Stoel, R. D., & Wichterts, J. M. (2009). Testing measurement invariance in the target rotated multigroup exploratory factor model. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Guenole, N., Levine, S. Z., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2013). The NEO Personality Inventory–Revised: Factor structure and gender invariance from exploratory structural equation modeling analyses in a high-stakes setting. Assessment, 20(1), 14–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E. (2009). Partial confirmatory factor analysis: Described and illustrated on the NEO PI–R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 40–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessen, D. J., Dolan, C. V., & Wicherts, J. M. (2006). The multi-group common factor model with minimal uniqueness constraints and the power to detect uniform bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (1991). The basic level of personality-trait hierarchies: Studies of trait use and accessibility in different contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 348–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research ( 3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, F. R., John, D., Lüdtke, O., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 548–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, F., Lüdtke, O., & Asendorpf, J. (2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen [Adequacy and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) in young, middle-aged, and old adults]. Diagnostica, 47, 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavardiére, O., Morin, A. J. S., & St-Hilaire, F. (2014). Factor structure and measurement invariance of a short measure of the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 739–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, R., Denissen, J. J. A., Allemand, M., & Penke, L. (2013). Age and gender differences in motivational manifestations of the Big Five from age 16 to 60. Developmental Psychology, 49, 365–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, D. Y., Wong, E. M., Chan, S. S., & Lam, T. H. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Big Five Inventory in a Chinese sample of smokers receiving cessation treatment: A validation study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(6). DOI:10.5430/jnep.v3n6p1
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S. Z., & Jackson, C. J. (2002). Aggregated personality, climate and demographic factors as predictors of departmental shrinkage. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 287–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport/exercise psychology. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology ( 3rd ed., pp. 774–798). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indices and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big-five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right – Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. (2012). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. (1996). Evaluating the replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (2005). Semiconfirmatory factory analysis: The example of anxiety and depression. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance, Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (1998-2010). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Plaisant, O., Courtois, R., Réveillère, C., Mendelsohn, G. A., & John, O. P. (2010). Validation par analyse factorielle du Big Five Inventory français (BFI–Fr). Analyse convergente avec le NEO PI–R [Validation through factor analysis of the French Big Five Inventory (BFI–Fr). Convergent analysis with the NEO PI–R]. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, 168, 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). An investigation of the factor structure and convergent and discriminant validity of the Five-Factor Model Rating Form. Assessment, 20, 24–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Pattern and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K. (2009). Reliability beyond theory and into practice. Psychometrika, 74, 169–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI–R facets, self–peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 84–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubbiali, A., Chiorri, C., Hampton, P., & Donati, D. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Italian adaptation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 266, 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, C., St-Onge, S., & Robineau, É. (2008). An analysis of the relation between personality and the attractiveness of total rewards components. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 63, 425–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassend, O., & Skrondal, A. (1997). Validation of the NEO Personality Inventory and the five-factor model: Can findings from exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis be reconciled? European Journal of Personality, 11, 147–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis vs. common factor analysis: Some further observations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortman, J., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2012). Stability and change in the big five personality domains: Evidence from a longitudinal study of Australians. Psychology and Aging, 27, 867–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar