A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current Status and Future Directions

References

• *Measures referenced only in Appendix C.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. 2014. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2014). Online assessment measures. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• *Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI–16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L., Quilty, L. C., Chmielewski, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). Associations between DSM–5 Section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2–Restructured Form (MMPI–2–RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychological Assessment, 27, 801–815.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Veltri, C. O. C., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY–5 domains and PID–5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM–5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 286–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoff, B. R., Denney, R. L., & Houston, C. M. (2007). Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 899–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., de Vries, R. E., Hendrickse, J., & Born, M. P. H. (2012). The maladaptive personality traits of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 641–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, B., Markon, K., Simonsen, E., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). Clinical utility of the DSM–5 alternative model of personality disorders: Six cases from practice. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 21, 3–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagby, R. M. (2013). Introduction to special issue on the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5). Assessment, 20, 267–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagby, R. M., Ayearst, L. E., Morariu, R. A., Watters, C., & Taylor, G. J. (2014). The Internet administration version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Psychological Assessment, 26, 16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagby, R. M., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L. E., Chmielewski, M. S., Anderson, J. L., & Quilty, L. C. (2014). Exploring the hierarchical structure of the MMPI–2–RF personality psychopathology five in psychiatric patient and university student samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 166–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A. T., & Beck, J. S. (1991). The Personality Belief Questionnaire. Bala Cynwyd, PA: The Beck Institute for Cognitive Therapy and Research.
   Google Scholar
• *Beck, A. T., & Freeman, A. (1990). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y., & Tellegen, A. (2011). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 Restructured Form: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Blashfield, R. K., & Reynolds, S. M. (2012). An invisible college view of the DSM–5 personality disorder classification. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 821–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (2009). A proposal for a dimensional classification system based on the shared features of the DSM–IV anxiety and mood disorders: Implications for assessment and treatment. Psychological Assessment, 21, 256–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, T. (2002). Online assessment: Desirable or dangerous? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 148–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchett, D. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2010). The impact of overreporting on MMPI–2–RF substantive scale score validity. Assessment, 17, 497–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, F. M. (2009). The cultural perspective in personality assessment. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 44–58). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, M., Bagby, R. M., Markon, K., Ring, A. J., & Ryder, A. G. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, schizotypal personality disorder, and psychoticism: Resolving the controversy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 483–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., Simms, L. J., Wu, K. D., & Casillas, A. (2007). Manual for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality–2nd edition (SNAP–2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. E., Narrow, W. E., Regier, D. A., Kuramoto, S. J., Kupfer, D. J., Kuhl, E. A., … Kraemer, H. C. (2013). DSM–5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part I: Study design, sampling strategy, implementation, and analytic approaches. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 43–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkin, J. F., & Huprich, S. K. (2011). Do DSM–5 personality disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility? Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 192–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, M. E., Cook, L. M., & Blake, T. R. (2007). Assessing obsessive compulsive symptoms and cognition on the Internet: Evidence for the comparability of paper and Internet administration. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2232–2240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI–R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO–FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P.T., Jr., & T. A. Widiger. (2002). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., Van Hiel, A., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). The hierarchical structure and construct validity of the PID–5 trait measure in adolescence. Journal of Personality, 82, 158–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fruyt, F., Bartels, M., Van Leeuwen, K. G., De Clercq, B., Decuyper, M., & Mervielde, I. (2006). Five types of personality continuity in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B., De Bolle, M., Wille, B., Markon, K., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM–5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dere, J., Watters, C. A., Yu, S., Bagby, R. M., Ryder, A. G., & Harkness, K. L. (2014). Cross-cultural examination of measurement invariance of the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Psychological Assessment, 27, 68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Brief Symptom Inventory. Administration, scoring, and procedures manual (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon, S., & Bagby, R. M. (2015a, March). The impact of response bias on the PID–5. Poster presented at the annual convention of the Society for Personality Assessment, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon, S., & Bagby, R. M. (2015b). The internal and one-week retest reliability of the PID–5 domains and facets. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• *Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffen, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Feighner, J. P., Robins, E., Guze, S. B., Woodruff, R. A., Winokur, G., & Munoz, R. (1972). Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. J. (2010). A meta-analysis of normal and disorders personality across the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 659–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few, L. R., Miller, J. D., Rothbaum, A. O., Meller, S., Maples, J., Terry, D. P., … MacKillop, J. (2013). Examination of the Section III DSM–5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1057–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• First, M. B. (2005). Clinical utility: A prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 560–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Benjamin, L. S. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis II disorders (SCID–II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
   Google Scholar
• First, M. B., Pincus, H. A., Levine, J. B., Williams, J. B., Ustun, B., & Peele, R. (2004). Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 946–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbey, J. D., & Lee, T. T. (2011). An exploration of the impact of invalid MMPI–2 protocols on collateral self-report measure scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 556–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossati, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Borroni, S., & Maffei, C. (2013). Reliability and validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5) predicting DSM–IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20, 689–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Milner, R., Akhtar, R., & De Fruyt, F. (2014). A review of the measures designed to assess DSM–5 personality disorders. Psychology, 5, 1646–1686.
   Google Scholar
• *Goldberg, L. R. (1999). The Curious Experiences Survey, a revised version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale: Factor structure, reliability, and relations to demographic and personality variables. Psychological Assessment, 11, 134–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (2006). Doing it all bass-ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 347–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, W. L. (2013). The DSM–5 dimensional trait model and the five factor model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM–5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, S. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2014). A closer look at the lower-order structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5: Comparison with the five-factor model. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., Morey, L. C., Gunderson, J. G., Skodol, A. E., Tracie Shea, M., & Stout, R. L. (2001). Internal consistency, intercriterion overlap and diagnostic efficiency of criteria sets for DSM–IV schizotypal, borderline, avoidant and obsessive–compulsive personality disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104, 264–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5): Constructs and MMPI–2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R., Reynolds, S. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2013). A review of systems approach for psychology and psychiatry: Adaptive systems, the Personality Psychopathology Five, and DSM 5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 121–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hendin, H. M., & Cheek, J. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray's Narcissism Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 588–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewson, C., & Charlton, J. P. (2005). Measuring health benefits on the Internet: A comparison of paper and Internet administrations of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 37, 691–702.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Schade, N., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. E. (2013). Connecting DSM–5 personality traits and pathological beliefs: Toward a unifying model. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., & Sellbom, M. (2013). Implications of DSM–5 personality traits for forensic psychology. Psychological Injury and Law, 6, 314–323.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). DSM–5 personality traits and DSM–IV personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 424–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., Krueger, R. F., Schade, N., Markon, K. E., & Morey, L. C. (2013). DSM–5 pathological personality traits and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 20, 269–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyler, S. E. (1994). Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire, 4+. New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, M., Karterud, S., Pedersen, G., Gude, T., & Falkum, E. (2004). An investigation of the prototype validity of the borderline DSM–IV construct. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109, 289–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jopp, A. M., & South, S. C. (2015). Investigating the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 using self and spouse reports. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 193–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2007). The almost untreatable narcissistic patient. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 503–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F. (2013). Personality disorders: The vanguard of the post DSM–5 era. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 355–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. V. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. V. (2013a). The Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5)–Adult. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessment-measures
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. V. (2013b). The Personality Inventory for DSM–5–Brief form (PID–5–BF)–Adult. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessment-measures
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM–5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2001). The higher-order structure of common DSM mental disorders: Internalization, externalization, and their connections to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1245–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, S. C., Quilty, L. C., Tackett, J. L., & Bagby, R. M. (2011). The hierarchical structure of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology (DAPP–BQ). Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 504–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lenzenweger, M. F., Clarkin, J. F., Kernberg, O. F., & Foelsch, P. A. (2001). The Inventory of Personality Organization: Psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in a nonclinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 13, 577–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Levenson, M., Kiehl, K., & Fitzpatrick, C. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livesley, W. J., & Jackson, D. N. (2009). DAPP–BQ: Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology—Basic Questionnaire. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Samuel, D. B., … Miller, J. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM–5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markon, K. E., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the personality inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5). Assessment, 20, 370–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2007). Brief versions of the NEO–PI–3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 116–128.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–3: A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee Ng, S., Bagby, R. M., Goodwin, B. E., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L. E., Dhillon, S., … Burchett, D. (in press). The effect of response bias on the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5). Journal of Personality Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. (2012). Five‐factor model personality disorder prototypes: A review of their development, validity, and comparison to alternative approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 1565–1591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Gentile, B., Wilson, L., & Campbell, W. K. (2013). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism and the DSM–5 pathological personality trait model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 284–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C., Benson, K. T., Busch, A. J., & Skodol, A. E. (2015). Personality disorders in DSM–5: Emerging research on the alternative model. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17(4), 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). Convergence between DSM–IV–TR and DSM–5 diagnostic models for personality disorder: Evaluation of strategies for establishing diagnostic thresholds. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 19, 179–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Jamerson, J. E., Samuel, D. B., Olson, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2006). Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the Five-factor model. Assessment, 13, 119–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kuramoto, S. J., Kraemer, H. C., Kupfer, D. J., Greiner, L., & Regier, D. A. (2013). DSM–5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part III: Development and reliability testing of a cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM–5. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 71–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. L. (2008). Computer- vs paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics, 51, 1352–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, J. M., Skodol, A. E., Kellman, H. D., Hyler, S. E., & Rosnick, L. (1992). Diagnosis of DSM–III–R personality disorders by two structured interviews: Patterns of comorbidity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur. Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren- Modells der Persönlichkeit [Language and personality structure: On the validity of the Five Factor Model of personality]. Regensburg, Germany: S. Roderer.
   Google Scholar
• *Patrick, C. J. (2010). Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM). Retrieved from https://www.phenxtoolkit.org/index.php?pageLink=browse.protocoldetails&id=121601
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Criterion-related validation. In their Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach (pp. 30–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Piedmont, R. L., Sherman, M. F., & Sherman, N. C. (2012). Maladaptively high and low openness: The case for experiential permeability. Journal of Personality, 80, 1641–1668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piedmont, R. L., Sherman, M. F., Sherman, N. C., Dy-Liacco, G. S., & Williams, J. E. G. (2009). Using the Five-factor model to identify a new personality disorder domain: The case for experiential permeability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1245–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS™): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18, 263–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilkonis, P. A., Hallquist, M. N., Morse, J. Q., & Stepp, S. D. (2011). Striking the (im)proper balance between scientific advances and clinical utility: Commentary on the DSM–5 proposal for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 68–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus, A. L. (2013). The Pathological Narcissism Inventory. In J. Ogrudniczuk (Ed.), Understanding and treating pathological narcissism (pp. 93–110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• *Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009). The initial development and derivation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations (Vol. 7). London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Quilty, L. C., Ayearst, L., Chmielewski, M., Pollock, B. G., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 in an APA DSM–5 field trial sample. Assessment, 20, 362–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kraemer, H. C., Kuramoto, S. J., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013). DSM–5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part II: Test–retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Rosenthal, S. A., Hooley, J. M., & Steshenko, Y. (2007). Distinguishing grandiosity from self-esteem: Development of the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., Hopwood, C. J., Ansell, E. B., Morey, L. C., Sanislow, C. A., Markowitz, J. C., & Grilo, C. M. (2011). Comparing the temporal stability of self-report and interview assessed personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 670–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., Hopwood, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Thomas, K. M., & Ruggero, C. J. (2013). Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM–5. Assessment, 20, 353–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Ball, S. A. (2012). An expert consensus approach to relating the proposed DSM–5 types and traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(1), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM–IV–TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., Anderson, J. L., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). Assessing DSM–5 Section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI–2–RF. Assessment, 20, 709–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, E. E. (2009). Assessment of the facets of the Five-factor model: Further development and validation of a new personality measure (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa City.
   Google Scholar
• Simms, L. I., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welle, J., & Rotterman, J. H. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD Project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skodol, A. E. (2012). Personality disorders in DSM–5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldz, S., Budman, S., Demby, A., & Merry, J. (1995). A short form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex scales. Assessment, 2, 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• *Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1737–1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland, C. M., Drislane, L. E., Lucy, M., Krueger, R. F., & Patrick, C. J. (2013). Characterizing psychopathy using DSM–5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 327–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, T., Samuel, D. B., Pahlen, S., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). DSM–5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 142, 343–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tackett, J. L., Quilty, L. C., Sellbom, M., Rector, N. A., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Additional evidence for a quantitative hierarchical model of mood and anxiety disorders for DSM–V: The context of personality structure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 812–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. J., & Bagby, R. M. (2012). The alexithymia personality dimension. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 648–673). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1987). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. M., Yalch, M. M., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G. C., Markon, K. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). The convergent structure of DSM–5 personality trait facets and Five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 20, 308–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trull, T. J., Useda, J. D., Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Comparison of the MMPI–2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5), the NEO–PI, and the NEO PI–R. Psychological Assessment, 7, 508–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uliaszek, A. A., Al-Dajani, N., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). The relationship between psychopathology and a hierarchical model of normal personality traits: Evidence from a psychiatric patient sample. Journal of Personality Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, J. (2012). A trait-based perspective on the assessment of personality and personality pathology in older adults (Doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.vub.ac.be/KLEP/UserFiles/File/Documents/PhD%20Joke%20Van%20den%20Broeck%202012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Kampen, D. (2012). The 5-Dimensional Personality Test (5DPT): Relationships with two lexically based instruments and the validation of the absorption scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kampen, D., & De Beurs, E. (2009). DAPP–BQ: Dimensionale assessment van persoonlijkheidspathologie inclusief screeningsversie [DAPP–BQ: Dimensional assessment of personality disorders including screening version]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Verheul, R. (2006). Clinical utility of dimensional models for personality pathology. In T. A. Widiger, E. Simonsen, P. J. Sirovatka, & D. A. Regier (Eds.), Dimensional models of personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM–V (pp. 203–218). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Verheul, R., Bartak, A., & Widiger, T. (2007). Prevalence and construct validity of personality disorder not otherwise specified (PDNOS). Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 359–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. (2004). Stability versus change, dependability versus error: Issues in the assessment of personality over time. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 319–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Stasik, S. M., Ro, E., & Clark, L. A. (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM–5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 20, 312–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999). Revising and assessing Axis II, part I: Developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 258–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1994). Personality and personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62(2), 71–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, C. W., Wygant, D. B., Hoelzle, J. B., & Gervais, R. O. (2012). The more you say the less it means: Overreporting and attenuated criterion validity in a forensic disability sample. Psychological Injury and Law, 5, 162–173.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. G. C., Calabrese, W. R., Rudick, M. M., Yam, W. H., Zelazny, K., Williams, T. F., & Simms, L. J. (2015). Stability of the DSM–5 Section III pathological personality traits and their longitudinal associations with psychosocial functioning in personality disordered individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 199–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. G. C., Pincus, A. L., Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM–5. Assessment, 19, 263–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. G. C., Pincus, A. L., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM–5 pathological personality traits. Assessment, 20, 339–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L. J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT–PD, PID–5, and NEO–PI–3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., Pincus, A. L., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM–5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam, W. H., & Simms, L. J. (2014). Comparing criterion-and trait-based personality disorder diagnoses in DSM–5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J., Altenstein, D., Krieger, T., Holtforth, M. G., Pertsch, J., Alexopoulos, J., … Leising, D. (2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM–5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar