883
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Section: Scoring Thematic Apperceptive Technique Stories for Research and Clinical Use

The Narrative Arc of TATs: Introduction to the JPA Special Section on Thematic Apperceptive Techniques

Pages 225-237 | Received 31 Jul 2016, Published online: 05 Apr 2017

References

  • AbdulSabur, N. Y., Xu, Y., Liu, S., Chow, H. M., Baxter, M., Carson, J., & Braun, A. R. (2014). Neural correlates and network connectivity underlying narrative production and comprehension: A combined fMRI and PET study. Cortex, 57, 107–127. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.017
  • Alvarado, N. (1994). Empirical validity of the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 59–79. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6301_5
  • Annotti, L. A, & Teglasi, H. (this issue). Functioning in the real world: Using storytelling to improve validity in the assessment of executive functions. Journal of Personality Assessment. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1205075
  • Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.). (1958). Motives in fantasy, action, and society: A method of assessment and study. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
  • Atkinson, J. W. (1981). Studying personality in the context of an advanced motivational psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 117–128.
  • Barkham, M. (2014). Practice-based research networks: Origins, overview, obstacles, and opportunities. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 14, 167–173. doi:10.1080/14733145.2014.929414
  • Bellak, L. (1993). The Thematic Apperception Test, the Children's Apperception Test, and the Senior Apperception Technique in clinical use (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. C., Sprague, B. N., & Molenaar, P. M. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23, 447–458.
  • Blankenship, V., Vega, C. M., Ramos, E., Romero, K., Warren, K., Keenan, K., … Sullivan, A. (2006). Using the multifaceted Rasch model to improve the TAT/PSE measure of need for achievement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 100–114. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_11
  • Bornstein, R. F. (2007). Toward a process-based framework for classifying personality tests: Comment on Meyer and Kurtz (2006). Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 202–207. doi:10.1080/00223890701518776
  • Bornstein, R. F. (2011). Toward a process-focused model of test score validity: Improving psychological assessment in science and practice. Psychological Assessment, 23, 532–544. doi:10.1037/a0022402
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cahill, J., Barkham, M., & Stiles, W. B. (2010). Systematic review of practice-based research on psychological therapies in routine clinic settings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 33. doi:10.1348/014466509X470789
  • Campus, N. (1974). Transituational consistency as a dimension of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 593–600. doi:10.1037/h0036664
  • Campus, N. (1976). A measure of needs to assess the stimulus characteristics of TAT cards. Journal of Personality Assessment, 40, 248–258. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4003_3
  • Castonguay, L. G., Pincus, A. L., & McAleavey, A. A. (2015). Practice research network in a psychology training clinic: Building an infrastructure to foster early attachment to the scientific-practitioner model. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 52–66. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.856045
  • Čermák, I., & Fikarová, T. (Eds.). (2012). Tematicko-apercepční test: interpretační perspektivy [Thematic Apperception Test: Interpretive perspectives]. Nove Zamky, Slovakia: PSYCHOPROF.
  • Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2016). Personality: Theory and research (13th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Chandler, L. A. (2008). Scoring manual for the need-threat analysis. In S. R. Jenkins (Ed.), Handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperceptive techniques (pp. 707–723). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Costantino, G. (2012). National Child Traumatic Stress Initiative School-Based Treatment and Services Adaptation Center (TSA) (Research Grant No. 1U79SM061265–01). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
  • Costantino, G., Dana, R. H., & Malgady, R. G. (2007). TEMAS (Tell-Me-A-Story) assessment in multicultural societies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Costantino, G., Malgady, R. G., & Cardalda, E. (2005). TEMAS narrative treatment: An evidence-based culturally competent therapy modality. In E. D. Hibbs, P. S. Jensen, E. D. Hibbs, & P. S. Jensen (Eds.), Psychosocial treatments for child and adolescent disorders: Empirically based strategies for clinical practice (2nd ed., pp. 717–742). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Coulacoglou, C. (2014). A study on the psychometric properties of the Fairy Tale Test (FTT). Rorschachiana, 35, 176–213. doi:10.1027/1192-5604/a000060
  • Cramer, P. (1991). The development of defense mechanisms: Theory, research and assessment. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Cramer, P. (2003). Personality change in later adulthood is predicted by defense mechanism use in early adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 76–104.
  • Cramer, P. (2004). Identity change in adulthood: The contribution of defense mechanisms and life experiences. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 280–316.
  • Cramer, P. (2006). Protecting the self: Defense mechanisms in action. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Cramer, P. (2015a). Defense mechanisms: 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 114–122. doi:10.1080/00223891.2014.947997
  • Cramer, P. (2015b). IQ and defense mechanisms assessed with the TAT. Rorschachiana, 36, 40–57. doi:10.1027/1192-5604/a000058
  • Cramer, P. (2016). Defense mechanism card pull in TAT stories. Journal of Personality Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1207080
  • Cramer, P. (this issue). Using the TAT to assess the relation between gender identity and the use of defense mechanisms. Journal of Personality Assessment. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1055358
  • Cramer, P., & Jones, C. J. (2007). Defense mechanisms predict differential lifespan change in self-control and self-acceptance. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 841–855.
  • Dana, R. H. (1956). An application of objective TAT scoring. Journal of Projective Techniques, 20, 159–163. doi:10.1080/08853126.1956.10380683
  • Dana, R. H. (2005). Multicultural assessment: Principles, applications, and examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Entwisle, D. R. (1972). To dispel fantasies about fantasy-based measures of achievement motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 377–391.
  • Eron, L. D. (1950). A normative study of the Thematic Apperception Test. Psychological Monographs, 64(9), Whole No. 315.
  • Eron, L. D. (1955). Some problems in the research application of the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Projective Techniques, 19, 125–129.
  • Eron, L. D. (1971). Putting the testing back in clinical psychology. PsycCritiques, 16, 356–357. doi:10.1037/014166
  • Eurelings-Bontekoe, E., Zwinkels, K., Schaap-Jonker, H., & Edrisi, M. (2011). Formal characteristics of Thematic Apperception Test narratives of adult patients with an autism spectrum disorder: A preliminary study. Psychology, 2, 687–693. doi:10.4236/psych.2011.27105
  • Fantini, F., Banis, A., Dell'Acqua, E., Durosini, I., & Aschieri, F. (this issue). Exploring children's induced defensiveness to the Tell Me A Story Test (TEMAS). Journal of Personality Assessment. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1261359
  • Feffer, M., Leeper, M., Dobbs, L., Jenkins, S. R., & Perez, L. E. (2008). Scoring manual for Feffer's Interpersonal Decentering. In S. R. Jenkins (Ed.), Handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperceptive techniques (pp. 157–180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Finn, S. E. (2007). In our clients' shoes: Theory and techniques of therapeutic assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Fischer, C. T. (1994). Individualizing psychological assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Frable, D. E. (1993). Being and feeling unique: Statistical deviance and psychological marginality. Journal of Personality, 61, 85–110. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00280.x
  • Frank, L. K. (1939). Projective methods for the study of personality. Journal of Psychology, 8, 343–389, 413.
  • Garb, H. N. (1998). Recommendations for training in the use of the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 621–622. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.29.6.621.b
  • Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Nezworski, M. T. (2002). Effective use of projective techniques in clinical practice: Let the data help with selection and interpretation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 454–463. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.33.5.454
  • George, C., & West, M. (2011). The Adult Attachment Projective Picture System: Integrating attachment into clinical assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 407–416. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.594133
  • Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., & Freeman, M. (2015). The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist, 70(1), 1–9. doi:10.1037/a0038597
  • Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Brusadelli, E., Zennaro, A., Di Girolamo, M., & Porcelli, P. (2016). The effects of neurological priming on the Rorschach: A pilot experiment on the human movement response. Rorschachiana, 37, 58–73. doi:10.1027/1192-5604/a000077
  • Gola, K. A., Thorne, A., Veldhuisen, L. D., Felix, C. M., Hankinson, S., Pham, J., … Rankin, K. P. (2015). Neural substrates of spontaneous narrative production in focal neurodegenerative disease. Neuropsychologia, 79(Part A), 158–171. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.022
  • Green, D. (2016). Making the case for using personalised outcome measures to track progress in psychotherapy. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 18(1), 39–57. doi:10.1080/13642537.2015.1130075
  • Henry, W. E. (1956). The analysis of fantasy: The thematic apperception technique in the study of personality. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Henton, I. (2012). Practice-based research and counselling psychology: A critical review and proposal. Counselling Psychology Review, 27(3), 11–28.
  • Hibbard, S. (2003). A critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) “The scientific status of projective techniques. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 260–271. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_05
  • Hibbard, S., Mitchell, D., & Porcerelli, J. (2001). Internal consistency of the Object Relations and Social Cognition Scales for the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 408–419.
  • Horner, M. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157–175. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00023.x
  • Howard, G. S. (1991). Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology, and psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 46, 187–197. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.3.187
  • Hoy-Watkins, M., & Jenkins-Monroe, V. (2008). The Contemporized-Themes Concerning Blacks Test (C-TCB). In S. R. Jenkins (Ed.), Handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperceptive techniques (pp. 659–684). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jenkins, S. R. (Ed.). (2008a). Handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperceptive techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jenkins, S. R. (2008b). Teaching how to learn reliable scoring. In S. R. Jenkins (Ed.), Handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperceptive techniques (pp. 39–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jenkins, S. R. (2014). Thematic apperceptive techniques inform a science of individuality. Rorschachiana, 35, 92–102. doi:10.1027/1192-5604/a000065
  • Jenkins, S. R. (this issue). Not your same old story: New rules for thematic apperceptive techniques (TATs). Journal of Personality Assessment. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1248972
  • Jenkins, S. R., Austin, H., & Boals, A. (2013). Content analysis of expressive writing narratives about stressful relational events using interpersonal decentering. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 412–432. doi:10.1177/0261927X13479188
  • Johnson, J. L. (1994). The Thematic Apperception Test and Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 314–319.
  • Kaplan, M. F. (1967). The effect of cue relevance, ambiguity, and self-reported hostility on TAT responses. Journal of Projective Techniques & Personality Assessment, 31(6), 45–50. doi:10.1080/0091651X.1967.10120431
  • Karon, B. P. (2000). The clinical interpretation of the Thematic Apperception Test, Rorschach, and other clinical data: A reexamination of statistical versus clinical prediction. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 230–233. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.31.2.230
  • Kroon, N., Goudena, P. P., & Rispens, J. (1998). Thematic apperception tests for a child and adolescent assessment: A practitioner's consumer guide. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16(2), 99–117. doi:10.1177/073428299801600201
  • Lelé, A. J., Flores-Mendoza, C. E., & de La Plata Cury Tardivo, L. S. (2014). Emergence of primary processes in the TAT of the Parisian School in adults with schizophrenia. Rorschachiana, 35, 134–153. doi:10.1027/1192-5604/a000059
  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2), 27–66. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.002
  • Lindhiem, O., Bennett, C. B., Orimoto, T. E., & Kolko, D. J. (2016). A meta‐analysis of personalized treatment goals in psychotherapy: A preliminary report and call for more studies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23, 165–176. doi:10.1111/cpsp.12153
  • Lindzey, G. (1952). Thematic Apperception Test: Interpretative assumptions and related empirical evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 49(1), 1–25. doi:10.1037/h0062363
  • Long, B. (1960). Perceptual reactions to the Thematic Apperception Test cards (Unpublished master's thesis), Utah State University, Logan, UT.
  • Mar, R. A. (2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 103–134. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145406
  • McAdams, D. P. (1980). A thematic coding system for the intimacy motive. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 413–432.
  • McAdams, D. P. (2009). The person: An introduction to personality psychology (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1977). The impact of power motivation training on alcoholics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 38, 142–144.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merits of operant and respondent measures. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 10–41). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
  • McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. Cambridge, MA: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690
  • McClelland, D. C., & Winter, D. G. (1969). Motivating economic achievement. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • McLean, K. C., Pasupathi, M., Greenhoot, A. F., & Fivush, R. (2016). Does intra-individual variability in narration matter and for what? Journal of Research in Personality. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.003
  • Meyer, G. J., & Kurtz, J. E. (2006). Advancing personality assessment terminology: Time to retire “objective” and “projective” as personality test descriptors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 223–225. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_01
  • Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.
  • Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Murstein, B. I. (1968). Discussion for current status of some projective techniques. Journal of Projective Techniques & Personality Assessment, 32, 229–232.
  • Murstein, B. I. (1972). Normative written TAT responses for a college sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 36, 109–147.
  • Murstein, B. I., David, C., Fisher, D., & Furth, H. G. (1961). The scaling of the TAT for hostility by a variety of scaling methods. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 497–504. doi:10.1037/h0040655
  • Navarrete, V., & Jenkins, S. R. (2011). Cultural homelessness, multiminority status, ethnic identity development, and self-esteem. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 791–804.
  • Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296–1312. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
  • Phillips-Bui, C. M. (2001, February). Story-telling as a test of executive function. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 4423.
  • Porcelli, P., Giromini, L., Parolin, L., Pineda, J. A., & Viglione, D. J. (2013). Mirroring activity in the brain and movement determinant in the Rorschach test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 444–456. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.775136
  • Reeves, A. (2011). Practice-based research and the development of evidence. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 11, 87. doi:10.1080/14733145.2011.582386
  • Rhodes, C. (2014). Do social stories help to decrease disruptive behaviour in children with autistic spectrum disorders? A review of the published literature. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 18(1), 35–50. doi:10.1177/1744629514521066
  • Ritzler, B. (2008). The Picture Projection Test. In S. R. Jenkins (Ed.), Handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperceptive techniques (pp. 229–245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Roberts, G. E. (2005). Roberts–2 test pictures. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  • Roberts, G., & Gruber, C. (2005). Roberts–2 manual. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  • Ronan, G. F., & Gibbs, M. S. (2008). Scoring manual for Personal Problem-Solving System–Revised. In S. R. Jenkins (Ed.), Handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperceptive techniques (pp. 209–228). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rorschach, H. (1942). Psychodiagnostics. Berne, Switzerland: Hans Huber.
  • Rosenzweig, S., & Fleming, E. E. (1949). Apperceptive norms for the Thematic Apperception Test II: An empirical investigation. Journal of Personality, 17, 483–503. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01226.x
  • Rossini, E. D., & Moretti, R. J. (1997). Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) interpretation: Practice recommendations from a survey of clinical psychology doctoral programs accredited by the American Psychological Association. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 393–398. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.28.4.393
  • Santa Maria, C.L. (2008). Richard Dana's objective TAT scoring system. In S. R. Jenkins (Ed.), Handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperceptive techniques (pp. 115–126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schultheiss, O. C. (2007). A memory-systems approach to the classification of personality tests: Comment on Meyer and Kurtz (2006). Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 197–201. doi:10.1080/00223890701357431
  • Schultheiss, O. C., & Schultheiss, M. (2014). Implicit motive profile analysis: An if–then contingency approach to the picture‐story exercise. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/spc3.12082
  • Schultheiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., Waugh, C. E., Stanton, S. J., Meier, E. A., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2008). Exploring the motivational brain: Effects of implicit power motivation on brain activation in response to facial expressions of emotion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 333–343. doi:10.1093/scan/nsn030
  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93
  • Shectman, F. (1979). Problems in communicating psychological understanding: Why won't they listen to me. American Psychologist, 34, 781–790. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.9.781
  • Shiller, R. J. (2016, January 24). How stories drive the stock market. New York Times: Economic View, 5.
  • Siefert, C. J., Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Sinclair, S. J., Haggerty, G., & Blais, M. A. (this issue). Estimating the effects of Thematic Apperception Test card content on SCORS–G ratings: Replication with a nonclinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1167696 (Original work published in Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(6), 598–607, 2016)
  • Smith, C. P., Atkinson, J. W., McClelland, D. C., & Veroff, J. (Eds.). (1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, C. P., Feld, S. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Methodological considerations: Steps in research employing content analysis systems. In C. P. Smith, J. W. Atkinson, D. C. McClelland, & J. Veroff (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 515–536). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Soukupova, T., & Goldmann, P. (2015). Personal problem solving of partners in divorce proceedings. Rorschachiana, 36, 82–103.
  • Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.
  • Stein, M., Hilsenroth, M., Slavin-Mulford, J., & Pinsker, J. (2011). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global rating method ( SCORS–G; 4th ed.). Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Siefert, C. J., Sinclair, S. J., Renna, M., Malone, J., … Blais, M.A. (2014). SCORS–G stimulus characteristics of select Thematic Apperception Test cards. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 339–349.
  • Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Siefert, C. J., Sinclair, S. J., Smith, M., Chung, W., … Blais, M.A. (2015). External validity of SCORS–G ratings of Thematic Apperception Test narratives in a sample of outpatients and inpatients. Rorschachiana, 36, 58–81. doi:10.1027/1192-5604/a000057
  • Streiner, D. L. (2003). Being inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 217–222.
  • Strober, M. (1979). The structuring of interpersonal relations in schizophrenic adolescents: A decentering analysis of Thematic Apperception Test stories. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 309–316.
  • Teglasi, H. (2010). Essentials of TAT and other storytelling assessments (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Teglasi, H. (2013). The scientific status of projective techniques as performance measures of personality. In D. H. Saklofske, C. R. Reynolds, V. L. Schwean, D. H. Saklofske, C. R. Reynolds, & V. L. Schwean (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment (pp. 113–128). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Teglasi, H., Nebbergall, A. J., & Newman, D. (2012). Construct validity and case validity in assessment. Psychological Assessment, 24, 464–475. doi:10.1037/a0026012
  • Teglasi, H., Rahill, S., & Rothman, L. (2007). A story-guided peer group intervention for reducing bullying and victimization in schools. In J. E. Zins, M. J. Elias, C. A. Maher, J. E. Zins, M. J. Elias, & C. A. Maher (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 219–237). New York, NY: Haworth.
  • Teglasi, H., & Rothman, L. (2001). STORIES: A classroom-based program to reduce aggressive behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 71–94. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(00)00060-1
  • Test, D. W., Richter, S., Knight, V., & Spooner, F. (2011). A comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the social stories literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26(1), 49–62. doi:10.1177/1088357609351573
  • Thomas, A. D. (2008). TAT Affective Scale manual. In S. R. Jenkins (Ed.), Handbook of clinical scoring systems for thematic apperceptive techniques (pp. 489–546). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Tolstoy, G. L. (1946). Anna Karenina. Cleveland, OH: World. (Original work published 1877)
  • Turk, A. A., Brown, W. S., Symington, M., & Paul, L. K. (2010). Social narratives in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Linguistic analysis of the Thematic Apperception Test. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 43–50. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.009
  • van den Daele, L. (2014). The Music Apperception Test: Coding, research, and application. Rorschachiana, 35, 214–235.
  • Verdon, B., Chabert, C., Azoulay, C., Emmanuelli, M., Neau, F., Vibert, S., & Louët, E. (2014). The dynamics of TAT process: Psychoanalytical and psychopathological perspectives. Rorschachiana, 35, 103–133. doi:10.1027/1192-5604/a000056
  • Vivero, V. N., & Jenkins, S. R. (1999). Existential hazards of the multicultural individual: Defining and understanding “cultural homelessness”. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 5, 6–26.
  • West, J. C., Mościcki, E. K., Duffy, F. F., Wilk, J. E., Countis, L., Narrow, W. E., & Regier, D. A. (2015). APIRE Practice Research Network: Accomplishments, challenges, and lessons learned. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 152–165. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.868948
  • Westen, D. (2007). The political brain: The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. New York, NY: Public Affairs Books.
  • Westen, D., & Bradley, R. (2005). Empirically supported complexity: Rethinking evidence-based practice in psychotherapy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 266–271. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00378.x
  • Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K. R., Gold, L., & Kerber, K. (1990). Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A Thematic Apperception Test analysis. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 355–364. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.2.4.355
  • Weisskopf-Joelson, E. (1955). Some speculations concerning the selection of clinical psychologists. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 697–699. doi:10.1037/h0042373
  • Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Winter, D. G. (1987). Leader appeal, leader performance, and motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 196–202.
  • Woike, B. A. (2008). The state of the story in personality psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 434–443. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00070.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.