Does the Convergent Validity of the PAI Antisocial Features Scale Depend on Offender Response Style?

References

• Amenta, A. E. (2005). The assessment of sex offenders for civil commitment proceedings: An analysis of report content (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns in forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84–94. doi:10.1027/s15327752jpa8701_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., Hawes, S., Simpler, A., & Johnson, J. (2010). Predicting recidivism with the Personality Assessment Inventory in a sample of sex offenders screened for commitment as sexually violent predators. Psychological Assessment, 22, 142–148. doi:10.1037/a0017818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., Rufino, K. A., & Gardner, B. O. (2014). Evaluator differences in Psychopathy Checklist–Revised factor and facet scores. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 337–345. doi:10.1037/lhb0000069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Rufino, K. A., Jackson, R. L., & Murrie, D. C. (2013). Personality Assessment Inventory scores as predictors of misconduct among civilly committed sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1390–1395. doi:10.1037/a0034048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D., Murrie, D. C., & Rufino, K. A. (2012). Do PCL–R scores from state or defense experts best predict future misconduct among civilly committed sex offenders? Law and Human Behavior, 36, 159–169. doi:10.1037/h0093949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Book, A. S., Holden, R. R., Starzyk, K. B., Wasylkiw, L., & Edwards, M. J. (2006). Psychopathic traits and experimentally induced deception in self-report assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 601–608. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2: Manual for administration and scoring (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cashel, M. L., Rogers, R., Sewell, K., & Martin-Cannici, C. (1995). The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the detection of defensiveness. Assessment, 2, 333–342. doi:10.1177/1073191195002004004
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M., Sorensen, J. R., & Reidy, T. J. (2016). Gender-responsiveness in corrections: Estimating female inmate misconduct risk using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Law and Human Behavior, 40, 72–81. doi:10.1037/lhb0000157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, R. E., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Rethinking trait conceptions of social desirability scales: Impression management as an expression of honesty-humility. Assessment, 21, 286–299. doi:10.1177/1073191113504619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Guy, L. S., Edens, J. F., Boer, D. P., & Hamilton, J. (2007). The Personality Assessment Inventory as a proxy for the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised: Testing the incremental validity and cross-sample robustness of the Antisocial Features Scale. Assessment, 14, 255–269. doi:10.1177/1073191107302138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Boccaccini, M. T., & Johnson, D. W. (2010). Inter-rater reliability of the PCL-R total and factor scores among psychopathic sex offenders: Are personality features more prone to disagreement than behavioral features? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 106–119. doi:10.1002/bsl.918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., DeMatteo, D., & Sorman, K. (2015). How reliable are Psychopathy Checklist–Revised scores in Canadian criminal trials? A case law review. Psychological Assessment, 27, 447–456. doi:10.1037/pas0000048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Hart, S. D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, J. K., & Olver, M. E. (2000). Use of the Personality Assessment Inventory to assess psychopathy in offender populations. Psychological Assessment, 12, 132–139. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., & Ruiz, M. A. (2006). On the validity of validity scales: The importance of defensive responding in the prediction of institutional misconduct. Psychological Assessment, 18, 220–224. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., & Ruiz, M. A. (2009). Predicting institutional aggression by defensive prison inmates: An examination of the Personality Assessment Inventory treatment consideration scales. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 178–185. doi:10.1080/14999010903358771
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, B. O., Boccaccini, M. T., Bitting, B. S., & Edens, J. F. (2015). Personality Assessment Inventory scores as predictors of misconduct, recidivism, and violence: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 27, 534–544. doi:10.1037/pas0000065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, B. O., Boccaccini, M. T., Rufino, K., & Murrie, D. C. (2012, March). Using offenders' PAI scores to understand evaluators' PCL–R scoring tendencies. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Gillard, N. D., & Rogers, R. (2015). Denial of risk: The effects of positive impression management on risk assessments for psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 42–43, 106–113. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. New York, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hawes, S. W., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2009). Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 21, 112–124. doi:10.1037/a0015036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaver, J. R., Lee, Z., Spidel, A., & Hart, S. D. (2009). Psychopathy and deception detection using indirect measures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 171–182. doi:10.1348/13443208X289964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucharski, L., Petitt, A. N., Toomey, J., & Duncan, S. (2008). The utility of the Personality Assessment Inventory in the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8, 344–357. doi:10.1080/15228930802199267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lally, S. J. (2003). What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 491–498. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.5.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2006). Using the BIDR to distinguish the effects of impression management and self-deception on the criterion validity of personality measures: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and assessment, 14, 131–141. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loza, W. (2005). Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): A tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 450–470. doi:10.1037/a0019216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J., & Kan, L. (2014). Test usage in four common types of forensic mental health assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45, 128–135. doi:10/1037/s0036318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C., & Meyer, J. K. (2013). Forensic assessment with the Personality Assessment Inventory. In R. P. Archer & E. A. Wheeler (Eds.), Forensic uses of clinical assessment instruments (2nd ed., pp. 140–174). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C., & Quigley, B. D. (2002). The use of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in assessing offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 333–349. doi:10.1177/0306624X02463007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Rufino, K., & Caperton, J. (2012). Field validity of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in sex offender risk assessment. Psychological Assessment, 24, 524–229. doi:10.1037/a0026015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D., Meeks, M., Woods, C., & Tussey, C. (2009). Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 19–53. doi:10.1037/a0014897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660–679. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 582–593. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidy, T. J., Sorensen, J. R., & Davidson, M. (2016). Testing the predictive validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in relation to inmate misconduct and violence. Psychological Assessment, 28, 871–844. doi:10.1037/pas0000224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Cruise, K. R. (2000). Malingering and deception among psychopaths. In C. B. Gacono (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner's guide (pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Cruise, K. R., Wang, E. W., & Ustad, K. L. (1998). The PAI and feigning: A cautionary note on its use in forensic-correctional settings. Assessment, 5, 399–405. doi:10.1177/107319119800500409
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Martin, M. A., & Vitacco, M. J. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders: A meta-analysis of the MMPI–2 and malingering. Assessment, 10, 160–177. doi:10.1177/1073191103010002007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Morey, L. C., & Ustad, K. L. (1996). Detection of feigned mental disorders on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A discriminant analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 629–640. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Salekin, R. T. (1994). A meta-analysis of malingering on the MMPI–2. Assessment, 1, 227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Rufino, K. A., Boccaccini, M. T., Hawes, S., & Murrie, D. C. (2012). When experts disagreed, who was correct? A comparison of PCL–R scores from independent raters and opposing forensic experts. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 527–537. doi:10.1037/h0093988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, M. A., & Ochshorn, E. (2010). Clinical applications of the PAI in criminal justice settings. In M. A. Blais, M. R. Baity, & C. J. Hopwood (Eds.), Clinical applications of the Personality Assessment Inventory (pp. 113–134). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Response styles on multiscale inventories. In R. Rodgers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. 182–206). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Health and Safety Code §841 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., & Duncan, S. A. (2005). Use of the PCL–R and PAI to predict release outcome in inmates undergoing forensic evaluation. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16, 459–476. doi:10.1080/14789940500034405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, A. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Edens, J. F., Douglas, K. S., Skeem, J. L., Verschuere, B., & LoPilato, A. C. (2016). Does response distortion statistically affect the relations between self-report psychopathy measures and external criteria? Psychological Assessment, 28, 294–306. doi:10.1037/pas0000168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR–20: Assessing risk for violence (version 2). Burnaby, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health Law and Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar