Development and Validation of Personality Disorder Spectra Scales for the MMPI–2–RF

References

• Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 62–81. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., & Sellbom, M. (2015). Construct validity of the DSM–5 Section III personality trait profile for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 478–486. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1051226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Veltri, C. O. C., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY–5 domains and PID–5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM–5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 286–294. doi:10.1177/1073191112471141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Pymont, C., Smid, W., De Saeger, H., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2015). Measurement of DSM–5 Section II personality disorder constructs using the MMPI–2–RF in clinical and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 27, 786–800. doi:10.1037/pas0000103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Snider, S. K., Sellbom, M., Krueger, R. F., & Hopwood, C. J. (2014). A comparison of the DSM–5 Section II and Section III personality disorder structures. Psychiatry Research, 216, 363–372. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, E. B., Pinto, A., Crosby, R. D., Becker, D. F., Anez, L. M., Paris, M., & Grilo, C. M. (2010). The prevalence and structure of obsessive–compulsive personality disorder in Hispanic psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 275–281. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S. (2017). DSM–5.1: Perspectives on continuous improvement in diagnostic frameworks. In K. S. Kendler & J. Parnas (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry IV: Classification of psychiatric illness (392–402). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, B., Anderson, J., & Simonsen, E. (2016). Continuity between interview-rated personality disorders and self-reported DSM–5 traits in a Danish psychiatric sample. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. doi: 10.1037/per0000171.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, B., & Sellbom, M. (2016). Continuity between DSM–5 categorical criteria and traits criteria for borderline personality disorder. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 61, 489–494. doi:10.1177/0706743716640756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, L. (1994). Factor analysis of symptom subtypes of obsessive compulsive personality disorder and their relationship to personality and tic disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55, 18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2016). An update and corrections to Williams and Lally's (2016) analysis of MMPI–2–RF acceptance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. doi:10.1037/pro0000115.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2011). MMPI–2–RF: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. P., Iscan, C., & Maser, J. (2007). Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM–IV personality disorders classification system. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 536–551. doi:10.1521/pedi.2007.21.5.536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, M. A., Hilsenroth, M. J., Castlebury, F., Fowler, J. C., & Baity, M. R. (2001). Predicting DSM–IV Cluster B personality disorder criteria from MMPI–2 and Rorschach data: A test of incremental validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 150–168. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blashfield, R. K., & Intoccia, V. (2000). Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 472–473. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.3.472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Rhemtulla, M., Cramer, A. O. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., Scheffer, M., & Dolan, C. V. (2016). Kinds versus continua: A review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs. Psychological Medicine, 46, 1567–1579. doi:10.1017/S0033291715001944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2: Manual for administration and scoring (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 31, 141–154. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.31.2.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., … Moffitt, T. E. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119–137. doi:10.1177/2167702613497473
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang, H. (2017). Epistemic iteration and natural kinds: Realism and pluralism in taxonomy. In K. S. Kendler & J. Parnas (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry IV: Classification of psychiatric illness (pp. 229–245). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckblad, M., & Chapman, L. J. (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–225. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.51.2.215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C. M., & Simms, L. J. (2017). Assessing inter-model continuity between the Section II and Section III conceptualizations of borderline personality disorder in DSM–5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1037/per0000243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, J. A., Arbisi, P. A., Erbes, C. R., Polusny, M. A., & Thuras, P. (2014). The MMPI–2 restructured form personality psychopathology five scales: Bridging DSM–5 Section 2 personality disorders and DSM–5 Section 3 personality trait dimensions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 173–184. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.866569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Benjamin, L. S. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis II personality disorders (SCID–II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & McNulty, J. L. (1999). MMPI–2 correlates for outpatient mental health settings. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. F., Hasin, D. S., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Ruan, W., & Pickering, R. P. (2004). Prevalence, correlates, and disability of personality disorders in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 65, 948–958. doi:10.4088/JCP.v65n0711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, R. L. (2000). The MMPI–2: An interpretive manual. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Grucza, R. A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: Predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 167–187. doi:10.1080/00223890701468568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, J. G. (2010). Revising the borderline diagnosis for DSM–V: An alternative proposal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 694–708. doi:10.1521/pedi.2010.24.6.694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K., Weed, N. C., & McNeal, T. P. (1996). Searching for conscientiousness on the MMPI–2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 354–363. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6702_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R., Finn, J. A., McNulty, J. L., & Shields, S. M. (2012). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5): Recent constructive replication and assessment literature review. Psychological Assessment, 24, 432–443. doi:10.1037/a0025830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5): Issue from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291–315). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5): Constructs and MMPI–2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicklin, J., & Widiger, T. A. (2000). Convergent validity of alternative MMPI–2 personality disorder scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 502–518. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7503_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., & Thomas, K. M. (2012). Personality disorders (6th ed.). In D. Beidel & M. Hersen (Eds.), Adult psychopathology and diagnosis (pp. 681–716). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). DSM–5 personality traits and DSM–IV personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 424. doi:10.1037/a0026656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2005). An examination of three sets of MMPI–2 personality disorder scales. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 370. doi:10.1521/pedi.2005.19.4.370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., … Zimmerman, M. (2017). The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotov, R., Ruggero, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Yuan, Q., & Zimmerman, M. (2011). New dimensions in the quantitative classification of mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 1003–1011. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890. doi:10.1017/S0033291711002674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM–5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Tackett, J. L., & MacDonald, A. (2016). Toward validation of a structural approach to conceptualizing psychopathology: A special section of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1023. doi:10.1037/abn0000223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwapil, T. R., Barrantes-Vidal, N., & Silvia, P. J. (2008). The dimensional structure of the Wisconsin schizotypy scales: Factor identification and construct validity. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 444–457. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. T. C., Sellbom, M., & Hopwood, C. J. (2017). Contemporary psychopathology assessment: Mapping major personality inventories onto empirical models of psychopathology. In S. C. Bowden (Ed.), Neuropsychological assessment in the age of evidence-based practice: Diagnostic and treatment evaluations (pp. 64–94). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, E. E., & Gotts, E. E. (1995). The clinical application of MMPI special scales. London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liggett, J., Carmichael, K. L. C., Smith, A., & Sellbom, M. (2017). Validation of self-report impairment measures for Section III obsessive–compulsive and avoidant personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 1–14. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1185613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liggett, J., Sellbom, M., & Carmichael, K. L. C. (2017). Examining the DSM–5 Section III criteria for obsessive–compulsive personality disorder in a community sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 31, 790–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livesley, W. J. (1987). A systematic approach to the delineation of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 772–777. doi:10.1176/ajp.144.6.772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loevinger, J. (1954). The attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 493–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694. doi:10.2466/pr0.1957.3.3.635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM–IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401–412. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markon, K. E. (2010). Modeling psychopathology structure: A symptom-level analysis of Axis I and II disorders. Psychological Medicine, 40, 273–288. doi:10.1017/S0033291709990183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihura, J. L., Roy, M., & Graceffo, R. A. (2017). Psychological assessment training in clinical psychology doctoral programs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 153–164. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1201978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millon, T. (1987). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–II. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems
   Google Scholar
• Millon, T., & Strack, S. (2015). An integrating and comprehensive model of personality pathology based on evolutionary theory. In S. K. Huprich (Ed.), Personality disorders: Toward theoretical and empirical integration in diagnosis and assessment (pp. 367–393). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (1991). Professional manual for the Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). Convergence between DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 diagnostic models for personality disorder: Evaluation of strategies for establishing diagnostic thresholds. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 19 (3), 179–193. doi:10.1097/01.pra.0000430502.78833.06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C., Waugh, M. H., & Blashfield, R. K. (1985). MMPI scales for DSM–III personality disorders: Their derivation and correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 245–251. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4903_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., & Widiger, T. A. (2009). Clinical utility and DSM–V. Psychological Assessment, 21, 302. doi:10.1037/a0016607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1962). The analysis of profile data. Psychological Bulletin, 59, 311–319. doi:10.1037/h0041246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. doi:10.2307/271063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ready, R. E., & Veague, H. B. (2014). Training in psychological assessment: Current practices of clinical psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45, 278. doi:10.1037/a0037439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Wood, D., & Caspi, A. (2008). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 375–398). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., Hopwood, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Thomas, K. M., & Ruggero, C. J. (2013). Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM–5. Assessment, 20, 353–361. doi:10.1177/1073191113486182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Ball, S. A. (2012). An expert consensus approach to relating the proposed DSM–5 types and traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 1–16. doi:10.1037/a0023787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2004). Clinicians' personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 286–308. doi:10.1521/pedi.18.3.286.35446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM–IV–TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2010). A comparison of obsessive–compulsive personality disorder scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 232–240. doi:10.1080/00223891003670182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055–1085. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler, C. E., Snibbe, J. R., & Buckwalter, J. G. (1994). Validity of the MMPI personality disorder scales (MMPI–PD). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 220–227. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199403)50:2<220::AID-JCLP2270500211>3.0.CO;2-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M. (2016). Elucidating the validity of the externalizing spectrum of psychopathology in correctional, forensic, and community samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1027–1038. doi:10.1037/abn0000171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., Bach, B., & Huxley, E. (2018). Related personality disorders located within an elaborated externalizing psychopathology spectrum. In J. Lochman & W. Matthys (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of disruptive and impulse-control disorders (pp. 103–124). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Patrick, C. J., Wygant, D. B., Gartland, D. M., & Stafford, K. P. (2012). Development and construct validation of MMPI–2–RF measures assessing global psychopathy, fearless-dominance, and impulsive-antisociality. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 17–38. doi:10.1037/a0023888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., Sansone, R. A., Songer, D. A., & Anderson, J. L. (2014). Convergence between DSM–5 Section II and Section III diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 325–332. doi:10.1177/0004867413511997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., Smid, W., De Saeger, H., Smit, N., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2014). Mapping the Personality Psychopathology Five domains onto DSM–IV personality disorders in Dutch clinical and forensic samples: Implications for the DSM–5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 185–192. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.825625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., & Smith, A. (2017). Assessment of DSM–5 Section II personality disorders with the MMPI-2-RF in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 384–397. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1242074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, C., Wright, A. G., Fowler, J. C., Frueh, B. C., Allen, J. G., Oldham, J., & Clark, L. A. (2015). The structure of personality pathology: Both general (‘g’) and specific (‘s’) factors? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 387. doi:10.1037/abn0000033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380–389. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.577475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Zapolski, T. C. (2009). On the value of homogeneous constructs for construct validation, theory testing, and the description of psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 21, 272. doi:10.1037/a0016699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somwaru, D. P., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995, March). Development and reliability of MMPI–2 based personality disorder scales. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Workshop and Symposium on Recent Developments in Use of the MMPI–2 and MMPI–A, St. Petersburg Beach, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L., & Miller, H. R. (1988). Validity of MMPI scales for DSM–III personality disorders: What are they measuring? Journal of Personality Disorders, 2, 238–242. doi:10.1521/pedi.1988.2.3.238
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2008). MMPI–2–RF: Technical manual. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). MMPI–2 Restructured Clinical (RC) scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrer, P. (2009). Why borderline personality disorder is neither borderline nor a personality disorder. Personality and Mental Health, 3(2), 86–95. doi:10.1002/pmh.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheul, R. (2005). Clinical utility of dimensional models for personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 283–302. doi:10.1521/pedi.2005.19.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the Five-Factor Model. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 431–456). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, E. A. (1996). Comparative validity of MMPI–2 and MCMI–II personality disorder classifications. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 569–582. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. G. C. (2011). Qualitative and quantitative distinctions in personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 370–379. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.577477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. G., Krueger, R. F., Hobbs, M. J., Markon, K. E., Eaton, N. R., & Slade, T. (2013). The structure of psychopathology: Toward an expanded quantitative empirical model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 281. doi:10.1037/a0030133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam, W. H., & Simms, L. J. (2014). Comparing criterion-and trait-based personality disorder diagnoses in DSM–5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 802–808. doi:10.1037/a0037633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachar, P. (2008). Real kinds but no true taxonomy. In K. S. Kendler & J. Parnas (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry (pp. 327–354). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2007). Psychiatric disorders: A conceptual taxonomy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 557–565. doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.4.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachar, P., & Kendler, K. S. (2017). The philosophy of nosology. Annual Review of Psychology, 13, 49–71. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanarini, M. C., & Frankenburg, F. R. (2007). The essential nature of borderline psychopathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 518–535. doi:10.1521/pedi.2007.21.5.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar