Predicting Postprobationary Job Performance of Police Officers Using CPI and MMPI–2–RF Test Data Obtained During Preemployment Psychological Screening

References

• Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2012). Interpreting the MMPI–2–RF. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., Corey, D. M., & Tarescavage, A. M. (2017). Using the MMPI-2-RF in preemployment evaluations of police officer candidates. In C. L. Mitchell & E. H. Dorian (Eds.), Police Psychology and Its Growing Impact on Modern Law Enforcement (pp. 51–78). Hershey, PA: IQI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2011). MMPI–2–RF: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010). Local police departments, 2007. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Corey, D. M. (2016, October). Assessment protocols, procedures & pass rates for psychological evaluations of police candidates. Paper presented at the International Association of Chiefs of Police Conference, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014). User's guide for the MMPI-2-RF Police Candidate Interpretive Report. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014). User's guide for the Police Candidate Interpretive Report. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2018). Assessing Police and Other Public Safety Personnel Using the MMPI-2-RF: A Practical Guide, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corey, D. M., & Borum, R. (2013). Forensic assessment for high risk occupations. In R. K. Otto & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 246–269). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cuttler, M. J., & Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). Prediction of law enforcement training performance and dysfunctional job performance with general mental ability, personality, and life history variables. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 3–25. doi:10.1177/0093854805282291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, G. (2004). Identifying psychological predictors of police officer integrity problems ( CFDA No. 16.710, “Creating a Culture of Integrity”). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. (1957). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Mountain View, CA: CPP: Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (1996). CPI Manual. Mountain View, CA: CPP: Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (2002). California Psychological Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G., Bradley, P., & Roberts. M (1998). An integrity scale for the CPI. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & McNulty, J. L. (1999). MMPI–2 correlates for outpatient community mental health settings. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Handbook of psychological assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrave, G. E., & Hiatt, D. (1989). Use of the California Psychological Inventory in law enforcement officer selection. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 267–277. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5302_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R., Finn, J. A., McNulty, J. L., & Shields, S. M. (2012). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5): Recent constructive replication and assessment literature review. Psychological Assessment, 24, 432–443. doi:10.1037/a0025830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5): Issues from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291–315). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, L. (2010). Women in law enforcement, 1987–2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Lowmaster, S. E., & Morey, L. C. (2012). Predicting law enforcement officer job performance with the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(3), 254–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, L. (1996). A practical guide to CPI interpretation. Mountain View, CA: CPP.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. D., & Johnson, M. (2001). CPI: Police and public safety selection report technical manual. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://media.post.ca.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• Sarchione, C. D., Cuttler, M. J., Muchinsky, P. M., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1998). Prediction of dysfunctional job behaviors among law enforcement officers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 904–912. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf, P. (2006, Aug). Managing law enforcement integrity: The state of the art (a summary of findings for law enforcement leaders). Paper presented at the Center for Society Law and Justice, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., Fischler, G. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2007). Identifying MMPI–2 predictors of police officer integrity and misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 985–1004. doi:10.1177/0093854807301224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilberg, S. W., & Corey, D. M. (2017). Peace Officer Psychological Screening Manual. Sacramento, CA: California Commission on POST.
   Google Scholar
• Tarescavage, A. M., Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2015). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 Restructured Form (MMPI–2–RF) predictors of police officer problem behavior. Assessment, 22, 116–132. doi:10.1177/1073191114534885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarescavage, A. M., Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2016). A prorating method for estimating MMPI–2–RF scores from MMPI responses: Examination of score fidelity and illustration of empirical utility in the PERSEREC police integrity study sample. Assessment, 23(2), 1273–190. doi:10.1177/1073191115575070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarescavage, A. M., Fischler, G. L., Cappo, B. M., Hill, D. O., Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2015). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2–Restructured Form (MMPI–2–RF) predictors of police officer problem behavior and collateral self-report test scores. Psychological Assessment, 27, 125–137. doi:10.1037/pas0000041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). The MMPI–2 Restructured Clinical (RC) scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar