Faking Good: An Investigation of Social Desirability and Defensiveness in an Inpatient Sample With Personality Disorder Traits

References

• Ackerman, M. J., & Pritzl, T. B. (2011). Child custody evaluation practices: A 20 year follow-up. Family Court Review, 49, 618–628. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01397.x
   Google Scholar
• Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 62–81. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Veltri, C. C., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY–5 domains and PID–5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM–5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 286–294. doi:10.1177/1073191112471141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoli, A., Gressot, G., Aapro, N., Tricot, L., & Gognalons, M. Y. (1989). Personality disorders as a predictor of outcome. Journal of Personality Disorders, 3, 307–320. doi:10.1521/pedi.1989.3.4.307
   Google Scholar
• Bäckström, M., Björklund, F., & Larsson, M. R. (2009). Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 335–344. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, R. A., & Miller, J. (2002). Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI–2: A meta analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 14, 16–26. doi:10.1037//10403590.14.1.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, R. A., & Sekirnjak, G. (1997). Detection of underreporting on the MMPI–2 in a clinical population: Effects of information about validity scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 555–567. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6903_9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagby, R. M., Nicholson, R. A., Buis, T., Radovanovic, H., & Fidler, B. J. (1999). Defensive responding on the MMPI–2 in family custody and access evaluations. Psychological Assessment, 11, 24–28. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.11.1.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baity, M. R., Siefert, C. J., Chambers, A., & Blais, M. A. (2007). Deceptiveness on the PAI: A study of naive faking with psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 16–24. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8801_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 317–335. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, L., McFarlane, L., Kiyimba, F., Clark, N., & Alexander, J. (2000). Factors underlying and maintaining nurses' attitudes to patients with severe personality disorder ( Final report to National Forensic Mental Health RandD, City University, London, UK).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2007). Temporal course and structural relationships among dimensions of temperament and DSM–IV anxiety and mood disorder constructs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 313–328. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J., Dahlstrom, W., Graham, J., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Manual for administering and scoring the MMPI–2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., & Han, K. (1995). Development of an MMPI–2 scale to assess the presentation of self in a superlative manner: The S Scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 25–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cashel, M. L., Rogers, R., Sewell, K., & Martin-Cannici, C. (1995). The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the detection of defensiveness. Assessment, 2, 333–342. doi:10.1177/1073191195002004004
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227–257. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, K. G., Bachrach, R. L., Wright, A. C., Pinto, A., & Ansell, E. (2016). Predicting problematic alcohol use with the DSM–5 alternative model of personality pathology. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 103–111. doi:10.1037/per0000131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, T. C., Michielutte, R., Askov, E. N., Williams, M. V., & Weiss, B. D. (1998). Practical assessment of adult literacy in health care. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 613–624. doi:10.1177/109019819802500508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon, S., Bagby, R. M., Kushner, S. C., & Burchett, D. (2017). The impact of underreporting and overreporting on the validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): A simulation analog design investigation. Psychological Assessment, 29, 473–478. doi:10.1037/pas0000359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fals-Stewart, W. (1995). The effect of defensive responding by substance-abusing patients on the Million Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 540–551. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6403_11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiduccia, C. E. (2015). Refining the definition and detection of response styles: An initial examination of defensiveness and feigning on the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/UNTETD/
   Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E. (2013). Modeling the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Evidence in favor of a revised model of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 645–656. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.816717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J. W., Rappaport, S., & Flens, J. R. (in press). Use of psychological tests in child custody evaluations: Effects of validity scale scores on evaluator confidence in interpreting the meaning of clinical scale score results. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., & Sellbom, M. S. (2013). Implications of DSM–5 personality traits for forensic psychology. Psychological Injury and the Law, 6, 314–323. doi:10.1007/s12207-013-9176-5
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. C., Krueger, R. F., Schade, N., Markon, K. E., & Morey, L. C. (2013). DSM–5 pathological personality traits and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 20, 269–285. doi:10.1177/1073191113486286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, J. W., Flanagan, E. H., & McCluskey, D. L. (2014). Functional impairment and the DSM–5 dimensional system for personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 657–674. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, J. W., Webb, C., Peterson, D., Roussin, L., & Flanagan, E. H. (2016). Development of a response inconsistency scale for the Personality Inventory for DSM–5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 351–359. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1158719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer, G., Sommer, M., & Arendasy, M. E. (2017). The psychometric costs of applicants' faking: Examining measurement invariance and retest correlations across response conditions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 510–523. doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1285781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890. doi:10.1017/S0033291711002674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM–5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 10477–10501. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyon, R. I. (1993). Development of scales to assess specific deception strategies in the Psychological Screening Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 5, 324–329. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.3324
   Google Scholar
• Lanyon, R. I., & Wershba, R. E. (2013). The effect of underreporting response bias on the assessment of psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 25, 331–338. doi:10.1037/a0030914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). DSM–IV personality disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 553–564. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupkin, S. (2015, March 27). Germanwings crash: How often pilots commit “aircraft-assisted suicide.” ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Health/germanwings-crash-pilots-commit-aircraft-assisted-suicide/story?id = 29932202
   Google Scholar
• Millon, T., Davis, R., & Millon, C. (1997). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–III manual (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, S. M., Bagby, R. M., Goodwin, B. E., Burchett, D., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L. E., … Baker, S. (2016). The effect of response bias on the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5). Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 51–61. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1096791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauls, C. A., & Crost, N. W. (2004). Effects of faking on self-deception and impression management scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1137–1151. doi:10.1016/j.paid.20031018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauls, C. A., & Crost, N. W. (2005). Cognitive ability and self-reported efficacy of self presentation predict faking on personality measures. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 194–206. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.26.4.194
   Google Scholar
• Picci, R. L., Vigna-Taglianti, F., Oliva, F., Mathis, F., Salmaso, S., Ostacoli, L., … Furlan, P. M. (2012). Personality disorders among patients accessing alcohol detoxification treatment: Prevalence and gender differences. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53, 355–363. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilty, L. C., Ayearst, L., Chimielewski, M., Pollock, B. G., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 in an APA DSM–5 field trial sample. Assessment, 20, 362–369. doi:10.1177/1073191113486183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2008). Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed, pp. 14–35). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (in press). Researching response styles. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2013). Evaluation of malingering and related response styles. In R. K. Otto & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology (Vol. 11, 2nd ed., pp. 517–540). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Gillard, N. D. (2011). Research methods for the assessment of malingering. In B. Rosenfeld & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology (pp. 174–188). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Robinson, E. V., & Gillard, N. D. (2014). The SIMS screen for feigned mental disorders: The development of detection-based scales. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 32, 455–466. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, M. A., Drake, E. B., Glass, A., Marcotte, D., & van Gorp, W. G. (2002). Trying to beat the system: Misuse of the Internet to assist in avoiding the detection of psychological symptom dissimilation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 294–299. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.33.3.294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., Hopwood, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Thomas, K. M., & Ruggero, C. J. (2013). Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM–5. Assessment, 20, 353–361. doi:10.1177/1073191113486182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandell, D. J., & Wlazelek, B. (1996). Self-presentation strategies on the NEO Five Factor Inventory: Implications for detecting faking. Psychological Reports, 79, 1115–1121. doi:10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3f.1115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinka, J. A., Kinder, B. N., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 127–138. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6801_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., … Siever, L. J. (2011). Personality disorder types proposed for DSM–5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 136–169. doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). MMPI–2 restructured clinical (RC) scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210. doi:10.1177/00131649921969802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., & Costa, P. T. (2012). Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: The Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 80, 1471–1506. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00776.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test–Fourth edition: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Yam, W. H., & Simms, L. J. (2014). Comparing criterion- and trait-based personality disorder diagnoses in DSM–5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 802–808. doi:10.1037/a0037633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M., Rothschild, L., & Chelminski, I. (2005). The prevalence of DSM–IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1911–1918. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar