Toward a Tripartite Model and Measurement of Proactive Personality

References

• Abdi, H. (2003). Factor rotations in factor analyses. Encyclopedia for Research Methods for the Social Sciences.: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baba, V., Tourigny, L., Wang, X., & Liu, W. (2009). Proactive personality and work performance in China: The moderating effects of emotional exhaustion and perceived safety climate. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne DesSciences De l'Administration, 26(1), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. doi: 10.1177/0018726712453471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 16(Series B), 296–298.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. doi: 10.1002/job.4030140202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, D. M., Schroeder, T. D., & Martinez, H. A. (2014). Proactive Personality at Work: Seeing More to Do and Doing More? Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 71–86. doi: 10.1007/s10869-013-9298-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2010). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology ( Vol. 2, pp. 567–598). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, A., & Manganelli, A. M. (2011). Measuring social desirability responding. A short version of Paulhus’ BIDR 6. Testing, Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18, 117–135.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, L. (2015). Work rules! Insights from inside Google that will transform how you live and lead. Twelve New York, NY: Hachette Book Group.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162).: Newbury Park, CA: Sage 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, A. H., & Finn, S. E. (1987). Classification of personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 432–444. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 23–43. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23
   Google Scholar
• Cangiano, F., Bindl, U., & Parker, S. (2017). The hot side of proactivity: Exploring an affect-based perspective on proactivity in organizations. In S. Parker & U. Bindl (Eds.), Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations. (pp. 355–384). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, P. D., Pathak, J., DePaul-Haddock, A. M., Gotlib, T., & Merbedone, M. (2012). Controlling your environment and yourself: Implications for career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 148–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M. (1995). The Proactive Personality Scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 532–537. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M. (1996). The Proactive Personality Scale as a Predictor of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 42–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 63–75. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200002)21:1%3C63::AID-JOB8%3E3.3.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M., Hu, J., & Jiang, K. (2017). Proactive personality: A twenty-year review. In S. Parker & U. Bindl (Eds.) Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations (pp. 193–225.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S., Baysinger, M., Brummel, B. J., & LeBreton, J. M. (2012). The relative importance of employee engagement, other job attitudes, and trait affect as predictors of job performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(S1), E295–E325. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, S. I., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002). Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 245–260. doi:10.1023/A:1019637632584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37–63. doi: 10.2307/256630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, J. B., Hester, K., & Cox, S. S. (2010). Proactive personality and job performance: Exploring job autonomy as a moderator. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22, 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, J. B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guion, R. M. (1965). Personnel testing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, D. P. (1977). Considerations in the choice of inter-observer reliability measures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 103–116. doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. doi: 10.1177/109442819800100106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, R., & Passey, J. (2010). Socially desirable responding in personality assessment: Not necessarily faking and not necessarily substance. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 446–450. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, L. M. (2003). Emerging trends and needs in personality research and practice: Beyond main effects. In M. R. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 289–325). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, M., & Griffith, R. (2004). Using personality constructs to predict performance: Narrow or broad bandwidth. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(2), 255–269. doi: 10.1007/s10869-004-0551-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1–19. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y., & Levine, A. S. (2014). Cross-sample comparisons and external validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1, 59–80. doi:10.1017/xps.2014.7
   Google Scholar
• Ledesma, R. D., & Valero-Mora, P. (2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2013). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org.
   Google Scholar
• Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 927–935. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNall, L. A., & Michel, J. S. (2011). A dispositional approach to work–school conflict and enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 397–411. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9187-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messara, L., & Dagher, G. (2010). Proactive personality: Organization vs. career commitment. Business Studies Journal, 2(2), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle, P., & Hackston, J. (in press). Personality assessment for employee development: Ivory tower or real world? Journal of Personality Assessment.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., & Shiarella, A. H. (1997). Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests: Multivariate frameworks for studying test validity. Personnel Psychology, 50, 823–854. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb01484.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S., & Bindl, U. (2017). Proactivity at work: A big picture perspective on a construct that matters. In S. Parker & U. Bindl (Eds.), Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations (pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. doi: 10.1177/0149206310363732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. doi: 10.1177/0149206308321554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp.17–59). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (2011). The observation of incremental validity does not always mean unique contribution to prediction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(3), 276–279.doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00556.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, J. (2014). The Amazon way: 14 leadership principles behind the world's most disruptive company. Clyde Hill, WA: Clyde Hill Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416–427. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845–874. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soper, D. S. (2017). A priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [software]. Available from http://www.danielssoper.com/statcalc.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzmuller, M., Sin, H. P., Howe, M., & Fatimah, S. (2015). Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review. Human Performance, 28(4), 351–379. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2015.1021041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275–300. doi:10.1348/096317910X502359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Relative importance analyses: A useful supplement to multiple regression analyses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornau, K., & Frese, M. (2012). Construct clean‐up in proactivity research: A meta‐analysis on the nomological net of work‐related proactivity concepts and their incremental validities. Applied Psychology, 62(1), 44–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar