Personality Assessment for Employee Development: Ivory Tower or Real World?

References

• Allread, W. G., & Marras, W. S. (2006). Does personality affect the risk of developing musculoskeletal discomfort? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomicfs Science, 7(2), 149–167. doi:10.1080/14639220500076504
   Google Scholar
• Amato, C. H., & Amato, L. H. (2005). Enhancing student team effectiveness: Application of Myers-Briggs personality assessment in business courses. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 41–51. doi:10.1177/0273475304273350
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, N., Herriot, P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The practitioner-researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here?, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 391–411. doi:10.1348/096317901167451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, M. (2002). Advanced communication skills: Conflict management and persuasion. Academic Medicine, 77(11), 1166. doi:10.1097/00001888-200211000-00034
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnau, R., Green, B., Rosen, D., Gleaves, D., & Melancon, J. (2003). Are Jungian preferences really categorical? An empirical investigation using taxometrical analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 233–251. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulou, A., & Dopson, S. (2015). Developing leaders by executive coaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45, 141–164. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00848.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwater, L., & Brett, J. (2006). Feedback format: Does it influence manager's reactions to feedback?. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 517–532. doi:10.1348/096317905X58656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbuto, J. E. (1997). A Critique of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and its operationalization of Carl Jung's psychological types. Psychological Reports, 80(2), 611–625 doi:10.2466/pr0.1997.80.2.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barends, E., Rousseau, D. M., & Briner, R. B. (2014). Evidence-based management: The basic principles. Amsterdam: Centre for Evidence-Based Management.
   Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18(4), 359–372 doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1804_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayne, R. (1995). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A critical review and practical guide. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
   Google Scholar
• Bernreuter, R. G. (1931). The personality inventory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bess, T. L., Harvey, R. J., & Swartz, D. (2003). Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Proceedings of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop-Clark, C., Dietz-Uhler, B., & Fisher, A. (2006-2007). The effects of personality type on web-based distance learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(4), 491–506. doi:10.2190/DG67-4287-PR11-37K6
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, P. L., Ferguson, C. B., Lehmann, T. H., & Rohde, F. H. (2003). Cognitive style factors affecting database query performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4, 251–273. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2003.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, G. J. (1995). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some psychometric limitations. Australian Psychologist, 30(1), 71–74. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.1995.tb01750.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley-Geist, J. C., & Landis, R. S. (2012). Homogeneity of personality in occupations and organizations: A comparison of alternative statistical tests. Journal of Business Psychology, 27, 149–159. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9233-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, S. P., Copeland, S., & Haynes, D. (2007). Accountants for the 21st century, where are you? A five-year study of accounting students personality preferences. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18, 511–537. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2006.01.013
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2017). The BPS qualifications in test use. Retrieved from http://ptc.bps.org.uk/sites/ptc.bps.org.uk/files/Documents/Guidelines%20and%20Information/BPS%20qualifications%20in%20Test%20Use%202017_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, F. W., & Reilly, M. D. (2009). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and transformational leadership. Journal of Management Development, 28(10), 916–932. doi:10.1108/02621710911000677
   Google Scholar
• Buckworth, J., Granello, D. H., & Belmore, J. (2002). Incorporating personality assessment into counseling to help students adopt and maintain exercise behaviors. Journal of College Counseling, 5, 15–25. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2002.tb00203.x
   Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602. doi:10.1177/0013164402062004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlyn, M. (1977). An assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41(5), 461–473. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4105_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carskadon, T. G., & Cook, D. D. (1982). Validity of MBTI type descriptions as perceived by recipients unfamiliar with type. Research in Psychological Type, 5, 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, C. (2016). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Still going strong and still getting it wrong. OP Matters, 32, 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1946). The description and measurement of personality, New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1993). 16PF fifth edition questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2016). New talent signals: Shiny new objects or a brave new world? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9 (3), 621–640. doi:10.1017/iop.2016.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2015). Annual Survey Report: Learning and Development 2015. London: CIPD. Retrieved from https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/strategy/development/surveys
   Google Scholar
• Choi, K. S., Deek, F. P., & Im, I. (2008). Exploring the underlying aspects of pair programming: The impact of personality. Information and Software Technology, 50, 1114–1126. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instrument in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Conte, J. M. (2005). A review and critique of emotional intelligence measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 433–440 doi:10.1002/job.319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, M. (2004). Personnel selection (4th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, , & McCrae,   (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Cseh, M., Davies, E. B., & Khilhi, S. E. (2013). Developing a global mindset: Learning of global leaders. European Journal of Training and Development, 37, 489–499. doi:10.1108/03090591311327303
   Google Scholar
• De Fruyt, F., & Wille, B. (2013). “Hey, This is not like me!” Convergent validity and personal validation of computerized personality reports. Revue Europeenee de Psychologie Appliquee, 63, 287–294 doi:10.1016/j.erap.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desson, S. (2017). The Lumina spark technical manual. Lumina Learning LLP. Retrieved from https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=f5a385ac9de87983&id=F5A385AC9DE87983%21107&authkey=!AIk0-F3Ick0veK0
   Google Scholar
• Dierdorff, E. C., & Rubin, R. S. (2015). We're not very self-aware, especially at work. Harvard Business Review, March 2015. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/03/research-were-not-very-self-aware-especially-at-work
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (2005). Managing Oneself. Harvard Business Review, January 2005. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2005/01/managing-oneself
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit, F., Coetzee, S. C., & Visser, D. (2005). The relation between personality type and sense of coherence among technical workers. South African Business Review, 9(1), 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. A., Lanning, K., & Hooke, K. (2002). The MBTI and social information processing: An incremental validity study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(3), 432–450. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7803_04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekuma, K. J. (2012). The importance of predictive and face validity in employee selection and ways of maximizing them: An assessment of three selection methods. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(22), 115–122 doi:10.5539/ijbm.v7n22p115
   Google Scholar
• Essig, T. (2014). The mysterious popularity of the meaningless Myers-Briggs (MBTI). Forbes, September 29, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/toddessig/2014/09/29/the-mysterious-popularity-of-the-meaningless-myers-briggs-mbti/#309d14171c79.
   Google Scholar
• Fleenor, J. W. (1997). The relationship between the MBTI® and measures of personality and performance in management groups. In C. Fitzgerald & L. K. Kirby (Eds.), Developing leaders: Research and applications in psychological type and leadership development (pp. 115–138). Boston: Davies-Black Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, C., Baldry, C., & Cunningham-Snell, N. (1998). The psychometric properties of 360 degree feedback: An empirical study and a cautionary tale. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6(1), 19–34. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1990). The fakeability of the 16PF, Myers-Briggs and FIRO-B personality measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 11 (7), 711–716. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(90)90256-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1996). The Big Five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 303–307. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2008a). HR Professionals’ believes about, and knowledge of, assessment techniques and psychometric tests. International Journal of Assessment and Selection, 16, 300–305. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00436.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2008b). Psychometric correlates of FIRO-B scores: Locating three FIRO-B scores in personality factor space. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 30–45. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00407.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2017). Myers-Briggs Indicator (MBTI). In Virgil Zeigler-Hill & Todd K. Shackelford (Eds). The SAGE Handbook of personality and individual differences. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2018). The great divide: Academic vs practitioner criteria for psychometric test choice. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(5), TBA.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2014). The dark side of the MBTI, Psychology, 5, 166–171. doi:10.4236/psych.2014.52026
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Jackson, C. (2011). Practitioner reaction to work related psychological tests. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 549–565. doi:10.1108/02683941111164472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Jensen, T., & Crump, J. (2008). Personality, intelligence and assessment centre expert ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(4), 356–365. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Crump, J. (2003). The relationship between the revised NEO-Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(6), 577–548 doi:10.2224/sbp.2003.31.6.577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Steele, H., & Pendleton, D. (1993)., A psychometric assessment of the Belbin team role self-perception inventory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 245–255. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1993.tb00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Varian, C. (1988). Predicting and accepting personality test scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 735–748 doi:10.1016/0191-8869(88)90063-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallen, T. (2006). Managers and strategic decisions: Does the cognitive style matter? Journal of Management Development, 25(2), 118–133. doi:10.1108/02621710610645117
   Google Scholar
• Garden, A. M. (1997). Relationships between MBTI® profiles, motivation profiles and career paths. Journal of Psychological Type, 41, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, J. (2016). In search of the best available evidence. London: CIPD.
   Google Scholar
• Girelli, S. A., & Stake, J. E. (1993). Bipolarity in Jungian type theory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60(2), 290–301. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaman, J. M., Jones, A. P., & Rozelle, R. M. (1996). The effects of co-worker similarity on the emergence of affect in work teams. Group & Organizational Management, 21(2), 192–215. doi:10.1177/1059601196212005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goby, V. P. (2006, February). Personality and online/offline choices: MBTI profiles and favored communication modes in a Singapore study. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9(1), 5–13. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golden, J. P. (2004). Golden personality type profiler. Austin, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. (2013). Say goodbye to MBTI, the fad that won't die. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20130917155206-69244073-say-goodbye-to-mbti-the-fad-that-won-t-die.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., Franklin, J., & Langford, P. (2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(8), 821–835. doi:10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, D., Iles, P., & Watson, S. (2010). Spanning the HRD academic-practitioner divide – bridging the gap through Mode 2 research. Journal of European Industrial Training 35(3), 247–263. doi:10.1108/03090591111120403
   Google Scholar
• Hackston, J. (2015). Type and work environment: A research study from OPP. Oxford: OPP. Retrieved from http://www.opp.com/download/item/c881c66e653d40c691e09a5f277c25b7
   Google Scholar
• Hackston, J., & Dost, N. (2016). Type and Email Communication: A research study from OPP. Oxford: OPP. Retrieved from http://www.opp.com/-/media/Files/PDFs/White_papers/Type-and-email-survey-report-2016-(1).pdf?la=en
   Google Scholar
• Haley, U. C. V., & Stumpf, S. A. (1989). Cognitive trails in strategic decision-making: Linking theories of personalities and cognitions. Journal of Management Studies, 26(5), 477–497. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00740.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, A. L., & Huszczo, G. E. (1996). Teams. In A. L. Hammer (Ed.), MBTI® applications: A decade of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (pp. 81–104). Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, R., & Loffredo, D. A. (2011). Insight, rumination, and self-reflection as predictors of well-being. The Journal of Psychology, 145 (1), 39–57. doi:10.1080/00223980.2010.528072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, R. J., & Murry, W. D. (1994). Scoring the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Empirical comparison of preference score versus latent-trait methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62(1), 116–129. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6201_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, R. J., Murry, W. D., & Stamoulis, D. (1995). Unresolved issues in the dimensionality of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 535–544. doi:10.1177/0013164495055004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). Manual for the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory. New York: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Hautala, T. M. (2005). The effects of subordinates' personality on appraisals of transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(4), 84–92. doi:10.1177/107179190501100407
   Google Scholar
• Hautala, T. M. (2006). The relationship between personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Management Development, 25(8), 777–794. doi:10.1108/02621710610684259
   Google Scholar
• Horacek, T. M., & Betts, N. M. (1998). College students dietary intake and quality according to their Myers Briggs Type Indicator personality preferences. Journal of Nutrition Education, 30(6), 387–395. doi:10.1016/S0022-3182(98)70361-9
   Google Scholar
• Hough, J. R., & Ogilvie, D. T. (2005, March). An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 417–448. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Gaertner, L., Wildschut, T., Kozar, R., Pinter, B., Finkel, E. J., Brazil, D. M., Cecil, C. L., & Montoya, M. R. (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (1), 95–111. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. L., & Washington, C. (2003). Employee development and organizational performance: A review of literature and directions for future research. Human Resource Development International, 6(3), 343–354. doi:10.1080/13678860110096211
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types (H.G. Baynes, Trans, revised by R. F. Hull). Collected (Vol. 6). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published in 1921 ).
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., Joyner, J. W., & Seaman, N. (1999). Effects of joint interpretation of the Strong Interest Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in career choice. Journal of Career Assessment, 7(3), 281–297. doi:10.1177/106907279900700306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, T., Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Garsoffky, B. (2006). Information visualizations for knowledge acquisition: The impact of dimensionality and color coding. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(1), 43–65. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, E. (1998). MBTI (European English Edition) step i manual supplement. Mountain View, CA; CPP Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kilmann, R. H., & Thomas, K. W. (1975). Interpersonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions. Psychological Reports, 37, 971–980. doi:10.2466/pr0.1975.37.3.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klehe, U-C. (2004). Choosing how to choose: Institutional pressures affecting the adoption of personnel selection procedures. Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 327–342. doi:10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krings, R., Jacobshagen, N., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2015). Subtly offending feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 191–202. doi:10.1111/jasp.12287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, F. T. L., Hardin, E. E., & Gaylor, M. (2005). Career specialty choice: A combined research-intervention project. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 69–86. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothian, A. M. (1996). Insights discovery preference evaluator. Dundee: Insights Learning and Development.
   Google Scholar
• McCaulley, M. H. (2000). Myers-Briggs type Indicator: A bridge between counselling and consulting. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 52, 117–132. doi:10.1037/1061-4087.52.2.117
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowall, , & Redman,   (2017). Psychological assessment – an overview of theoretical, practical and industry trends. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Division of Occupational Psychology Annual Conference, Liverpool, January 2017. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa-kU5qwilE
   Google Scholar
• MacIver, R., Anderson, N., Costa, A., & Evers, A. (2014). Validity of Interpretation: A user validity perspective beyond the test score. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(2), 149–164. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPeek, R. W., Breiner, J., Murphy, E., Brock, C., Grossman, L., Loeb, M., & Tallevi, L. (2013). Student type, teacher type, and type training: CAPT Type and education research 2008–2011 project summary. Journal of Psychological Type, 73(3), 21–54.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2003). Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a tool for leadership development? apply with caution. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(1), 68–81. doi:10.1177/107179190301000106
   Google Scholar
• Michell, J. (2000). Normal science, pathological science, and psychometrics. Theory and Psychology, 10(5), 639–667. doi:10.1177/0959354300105004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michell, J. (2012). “The constantly recurring argument”: Inferring quantity from order. Theory and Psychology, 22(3), 255–271. doi:10.1177/0959354311434656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J., Robey, D., & Smith, L. (1985). Conflict-handling and personality dimensions of project-management personnel. Psychological Reports, 57, 1135–1143. doi:10.2466/pr0.1985.57.3f.1135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshavi, D., Brown, F., & Dodd, N. (2003). Leader Self-Awareness and its relationship to subordinate attitudes and performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24, 407–418. doi:10.1108/01437730310498622
   Google Scholar
• Murphy Paul, A. (2004). The cult of personality: How personality tests are leading us to miseducate our children, mismanage our companies, and misunderstand ourselves. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B. (1962). Manual: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI Manual: A guide to the development and user of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Instrument. Mountain View, CA: CPP.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1995). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OPP (2013). MBTI® Step II™ Instrument European data supplement, January 2013. Oxford: OPP. Retrieved from http://www.opp.com/download/item/3e9f331e0f0d420e976d0260b38d7242
   Google Scholar
• OPP (2016). MBTI® Step I™ Instrument European data supplement, December 2016. Oxford: OPP. Retrieved from http://www.opp.com/download/item/082ac33389fb48d1a659066f56d972df
   Google Scholar
• OPP (2017). Terms of Business for the purchase of product; Guidelines for the ethical use of tests and questionnaires. Retrieved from http://www.opp.com/en/About-OPP/Terms-of-Business
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, J. (2012) (ed.). Psychometrics in coaching: Using psychological and psychometric tools for development (2nd ed). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pittenger, D. J. (1993). The utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63, 467–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221. doi:10.1037/1065-9293.57.3.210
   Google Scholar
• Pulver, C. A., & Kelly, K. R. (2008). Incremental validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in predicting academic major selection of undecided university students. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(4), 441–455. doi:10.1177/1069072708318902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quenk, N. L. (1998). In the Grip. Oxford, UK: OPP.
   Google Scholar
• Quenk, N. L. (2002). What that really me?. Palo Alto, CA: Davies Black: CPP.
   Google Scholar
• Quenk, N. L., Hammer, A. L., & Majors, M. S. (2004). MBTI Step II Manual: Exploring the next level of type (European edition). Mountain View, CA: CPP.
   Google Scholar
• Quintero, A. J., Segal, L. S., King, T. S., & Black, K. P. (2009). The personal interview: Assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents. Academic Medicine, 84(10), 1364–1372. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6a9af
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner, W., Bendele, J. M., Alexandrovicz, R., & Deakin, P. (2014). Does the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator measure anything beyond the NEO Five Factor Inventory? Journal of Psychological Type, 74(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, I. T., & Smith, J. M. (2001). Personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 74(4), 441–472. doi:10.1348/096317901167479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. (2017). Coaching with personality type: What works. London, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Karol, D. (1994). 16PF fifth edition administrator's guide. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Saggino, A., Cooper, C., & Kline, P. (2001). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Personality & Individual Differences, 30, 3–9. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00004-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saggino, A., & Kline, P. (1996). The location of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in personality factor space. Personality & Individual Differences, 21, 591–597. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, D. W., Forney, D. S., & Evans, N. J. (2005). Two approaches to examining the stability of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator scores. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 208–219. doi:10.1080/07481756.2005.11909761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I-S., & Shaffer, J. A. (2016). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 100 years of research findings. Manuscript in progress. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.18843.26400
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (2), 262–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, C., Warner, R., & Malone, D. (1980). Effects of assignment in living units by personality types on environmental perceptions and student development. Journal of College Student Personnel, 21(15), 443–449.
   Google Scholar
• Schullery, N. M., & Schullery, S. E. (2006). Are heterogeneous or homogeneous groups more beneficial to students? Journal of Management Education, 30(4), 542–556. doi:10.1177/1052562905277305
   Google Scholar
• Scoular, A. (2011). The financial times guide to business coaching. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlock, J. R. (2005). An exploratory study of the validity of the MBTI team report. Journal of Psychological Type, 65(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Short, G. J., & Grasha, A. F. (1995). The relationship of MBTI® dimensions to perceptions of stress and coping strategies in managers. Journal of Psychological Type, 32, 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sipps, G. J., Alexander, R. A., & Freidt, L. (1985). Item analysis of the myers-briggs type indicator. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 45(4), 789–796. doi:10.1177/0013164485454009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. M., & Smith, P. (2005). Testing people at work: Competencies in psychometric testing. Oxford: BPS Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stockill, R. (2014). Measuring the impact of training and development workshops: An action orientated approach. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Division of Occupational Psychology Annual Conference, Brighton. Retrieved from https://www1.bps.org.uk/system/files/user-files/Division%20of%20Occupational%20Psychology%20Annual%20Conference%202014/dop2014_book_of_abstracts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, E., & Busby, P. L. (1997). Co-workers’ perceptions of eight MBTI® leader types: Comparative analysis of managers’ SYMLOG profiles. In C. Fitzgerald & L. K. Kirby (Eds.), Developing leaders: Research and applications in psychological type and leadership development (pp. 225–265). Boston: Davies-Black Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Allinson, C., & Williams, H. (2013). Personality type and work-related outcomes: An exploratory application of the Enneagram model. European Management Journal, 31, 234–249. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2012.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafreshi, D., Slaney, K. L., & Neufeld, S. D. (2016). Quantification in psychology: Critical analysis of an unreflective practice. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 36 (4), 233–249. doi:10.1037/teo0000048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinsley, H. E. A., Tinsley, D. J., & Rushing, J. (2002). Psychological type, decision-making style, and reactions to structured career interventions. Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 258–280. doi:10.1177/1069072702010002008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., Benne, M. R., Marr, M. J., Thomas, E. W., & Hume, R. M. (2000). The evidence remains stable: The MBTI predicts attraction and attrition in an engineering program. Journal of Psychological Type, 55, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B., & Borello, G. M. (1989). A confirmatory factor analysis of data from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Houston, TX, January 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1930). A neurotic inventory. Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 3–20. doi:10.1080/00224545.1930.9714128
   Google Scholar
• Tjan, A. K. (2012). How leaders become self-aware. Harvard Business Review, July 2012. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2012/07/how-leaders-become-self-aware
   Google Scholar
• Van Velsor, E. V., Taylor, S., & Leslie, J. B. (1993). An examination of the relationships among self-perception accuracy, self-awareness, gender and leader effectiveness. Human Resources Management, 32(2-3), 249–263. doi:10.1002/hrm.3930320205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. (1983). Reliability and validity study of a Sufi personality typology: The Enneagram. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(5), 712–717. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198309)39:5%3c712::AID-JCLP2270390511%3e3.0.CO;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallick, M. M., Cambre, K. M., & McClugage, S. G. (2000, August). Does the admissions committee select medical students in its own image? Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society, 152(8), 393–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weber, A. J., Schaubhut, N. A., & Thompson, R. (2011). The influence of personality on social media usage. CPP research paper, Mountain View: CPP.
   Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S. (1917). Personal data sheet. Chicago: C.H. Stoetling Company.
   Google Scholar
• Zibarras, L. D., & Woods, S. A. (2010). A survey of UK selection practices across different organization sizes and industry sectors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 499–511. doi:10.1348/096317909X425203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar