371
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Testing the Assumption of Population Homogeneity in the Measurement of Dispositional Optimism: Factor Mixture Modeling Analysis

ORCID Icon
Pages 238-249 | Received 26 Oct 2017, Accepted 02 Jul 2018, Published online: 27 Sep 2018

References

  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071.
  • Borsboom, D., Rhemtulla, M., Cramer, A. O., van der Maas, H. L., Scheffer, M., & Dolan, C. V. (2016). Kinds versus continua: A review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs. Psychological Medicine, 46, 1567–1579.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
  • Chang, E. C., D’Zurilla, T. J., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1994). Assessing the dimensionality of optimism and pessimism using a multimeasure approach. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 18, 143–160.
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
  • Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 381–398.
  • Geiser, C., Burns, G. L., & Servera, M. (2014). Testing for measurement invariance and latent mean differences across methods: Interesting incremental information from multitrait-multimethod studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1216.
  • Gu, H., Wen, Z., & Fan, X. (2017). Examining and controlling for wording effect in a self-report measure: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 545–555.
  • Hallquist, M. N., & Wright, A. G. C. (2014). Mixture modeling methods for the assessment of normal and abnormal personality, Part I: Cross-sectional models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 256–268.
  • Herzberg, P. Y., Glaesmer, H., & Hoyer, J. (2006). Separating optimism and pessimism: A robust psychometric analysis of the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Psychological Assessment, 18, 433–438.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
  • Kam, C. C. S., & Fan, X. (2018). Investigating response heterogeneity in the context of positively and negatively worded items by using factor mixture modeling. Organization Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1094428118790371
  • Kam, C., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Do optimism and pessimism have different relationships with personality dimensions? A re-examination. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 123–127.
  • Kam, C. C. S., & Meyer, J. P. (2015a). How careless responding and acquiescence response bias can influence construct dimensionality: The case of job satisfaction. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 512–541.
  • Kam, C. C. S., & Meyer, J. P. (2015b). Implications of item keying and item valence for the investigation of construct dimensionality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 457–469.
  • Litson, K., Geiser, C., Burns, G. L., & Servera, M. (2017). Examining trait × method interactions using mixture distribution multitrait-multimethod models. Structural Equation Modeling, 24(1), 31–51.
  • Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39.
  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
  • Marshall, G. N., Wortman, C. B., Kusulas, J. W., Hervig, L. K., & Vickers, R. R. Jr. (1992). Distinguishing optimism from pessimism: Relations to fundamental dimensions of mood and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1067–1074.
  • Magaletta, P. R., & Oliver, J. M. (1999). The hope construct, will, and ways: Their relations with self-efficacy, optimism, and general well-being. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 539–551.
  • Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Random intercept item factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 11, 344–362.
  • McPherson, J., & Mohr, P. (2005). The role of item extremity in the emergence of keying-related factors: an exploration with the life orientation test. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 120–128.
  • Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Oglesby, M. E., Allan, N. P., Short, N. A., Raines, A. M., & Schmidt, N. B. (2017). Factor mixture modeling of intolerance of uncertainty. Psychological Assessment, 29, 435–445.
  • Rauch, W. A., Schweizer, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2007). Method effects due to social desirability as a parsimonious explanation of the deviation from unidimensionality in LOT-R scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1597–1607.
  • Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G. A., & Li, T. (2016). Evaluation of measurement instrument criterion validity in finite mixture settings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 1026–1044.
  • Reise, S. P., Kim, D. S., Mansolf, M., & Widaman, K. F. (2016). Is the bifactor model a better model or is it just better at modeling implausible responses? Application of iteratively reweighted least squares to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 818–838.
  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical índices. Psychological Methods, 21, 137–150.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In R. D. H. Heijmans, D. S. G. Pollock, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis: A Festschrift for Heinz Neudecker (pp. 233–247). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Scheier, M. E., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.
  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.
  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.
  • Segerstrom, S. C., Evans, D. R., & Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A. (2011). Optimism and pessimism dimensions in the Life Orientation Test-Revised: Method and meaning. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(1), 126–129.
  • Sweeny, K., & Shepperd, J. A. (2010). The costs of optimism and the benefits of pessimism. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 10, 750–753.
  • Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Ohio State University series on attitudes and persuasion, Vol. 4. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
  • van Sonderen, E., Sanderman, R., & Coyne, J. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLoS One, 8, e68967. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068967
  • Vautier, S., Raufaste, E., & Cariou, M. (2003). Dimensionality of the Revised Life Orientation Test and the status of the filler items. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 390–400.
  • Wimberly, S. R., Carver, C. S., & Antoni, M. H. (2008). Effects of optimism, interpersonal relationships, and distress on psychosexual well-being among women with early stage breast cancer. Psychological Health, 23(1), 57–72.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.