Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Personality Assessment Volume 102, 2020 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
3,010
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The HEXACO–100 Across 16 Languages: A Large-Scale Test of Measurement Invariance

Isabel ThielmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany; Correspondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-5709
ORCID Icon,
Nazar AkramiDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9641-6275
ORCID Icon,
Toni BabarovićIvo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia;
,
Amparo BellochDepartment of Personality, Evaluation, and Psychological Treatments, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4280-9946
ORCID Icon,
Robin BerghHarvard University;
,
Antonio ChirumboloDeparment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-2489
ORCID Icon,
Petar ČolovićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-1212-3131
ORCID Icon,
Reinout E. de VriesDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam & Department of Educational Science, University of Twente, The Netherlands; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-5839
ORCID Icon,
Daniel DostálPalacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic;
,
Marina EgorovaLomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia;
,
Augusto GnisciDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,”Caserta, Italy; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-3405
ORCID Icon,
Timo HeydaschDepartment of Work and Organisational Psychology, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany;
,
Benjamin E. HilbigDepartment of Psychology, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany;
,
Kung-Yu HsuDepartment of Psychology, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan;
,
Paweł IzdebskiInstitute of Psychology, Department of General and Health Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland;
,
Luigi LeoneDepartment of Social & Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3397-8016
ORCID Icon,
Bernd MarcusDepartment of Business Administration, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany;
,
Janko MeđedovićInstitute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrad, Serbia;
,
János NagyEötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary;
,
Oksana ParshikovaLomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia;
,
Marco PeruginiUniversity of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4864-6623
ORCID Icon,
Boban PetrovićInstitute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrad, Serbia;
,
Estrella RomeroUniversity of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9239-2544
ORCID Icon,
Ida SergiDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,”Caserta, Italy; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8073-1150
ORCID Icon,
Kang-Hyun ShinAjou University, Suwon, South Korea;
,
Snežana SmederevacDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3780-0576
ORCID Icon,
Iva ŠverkoIvo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia;
,
Piotr SzarotaInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland;
,
Zsofia SzirmákIndependent Practice, Berlin, Germany;
,
Arkun TatarFatih Sultan Mehmet University, Istanbul, Turkey; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2369-9040
ORCID Icon,
Akio WakabayashiChiba University, Inage-Ku, Chiba, Japan;
,
S. Arzu WastiSabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey;
,
Tereza ZáškodnáPalacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic;
,
Ingo ZettlerUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-7160
ORCID Icon,
Michael C. AshtonDepartment of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada;
&
Kibeom LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Alberta, CanadaORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-5596
ORCID Icon show all
Pages 714-726 | Received 05 Oct 2018, Accepted 01 Apr 2019, Published online: 11 Jun 2019

References

  • Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., Eisenberg, N., Caprara, G. V., & Cieciuch, J. (2014). On the cross‐cultural replicability of the resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality types. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 340–353. doi:10.1111/jopy.12065
  • Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Eisenberg, N., & Łaguna, M. (2015). On the factor structure of the Rosenberg (1965) General Self-Esteem Scale. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 621–635. doi:10.1037/pas0000073
  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907
  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1216–1228. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006
  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & De Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139–152. doi:10.1177/1088868314523838
  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., … De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 397–438. doi:10.1080/10705510903008204
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(4), 495–508. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.919210
  • Babarović, T., & Šverko, I. (2013). The HEXACO personality domains in the Croatian sample. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 22(3), 397–411. doi:10.5559/di.22.3.01
  • Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 41–75. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3
  • Bergh, R., & Akrami, N. (2016). Are non-agreeable individuals prejudiced? Comparing different conceptualizations of agreeableness. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 153–159. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.052
  • Bowden, S. C., Saklofske, D. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Sudarshan, N. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (2016). Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire across 33 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 53–60. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.028
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. O. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.3.456
  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055107013. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  • Church, A. T., Alvarez, J. M., Mai, N. T. Q., French, B. F., Katigbak, M. S., & Ortiz, F. A. (2011). Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1068–1089. doi:10.1037/a0025290
  • Church, A. T., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen’s three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 93–114. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.93
  • Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 943–963. doi:10.1037/a0037245
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI–R) and NEO Five–Factor Inventory (NEO–FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 55–75. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
  • De Vries, R. E., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The Dutch HEXACO personality inventory: Psychometric properties, self-other agreement, and relations with psychopathy among low and high acquaintanceship dyads. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 142–151. doi:10.1080/00223890701845195
  • De Vries, R. E., & van Kampen, D. (2010). The HEXACO and 5DPT models of personality: A comparison and their relationships with psychopathy, egoism, pretentiousness, immorality, and Machiavellianism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(2), 244–257. doi:10.1521/pedi.2010.24.2.244
  • Dimitrova, R., Crocetti, E., Buzea, C., Jordanov, V., Kosic, M., Tair, E., … Uka, F. (2016). The Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): Measurement invariance and cross-national comparisons of youth from seven European countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 119–127. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000241
  • Dunlop, P. D., Morrison, D. L., Koenig, J., & Silcox, B. (2012). Comparing the Eysenck and HEXACO models of personality in the prediction of adult delinquency. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 194–202. doi:10.1002/per.824
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
  • Heck, D. W., Thielmann, I., Moshagen, M., & Hilbig, B. E. (2018). Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making. Judgment & Decision Making, 13, 356–371.
  • Hershfield, H. E., Cohen, T. R., & Thompson, L. (2012). Short horizons and tempting situations: Lack of continuity to our future selves leads to unethical decision making and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 298–310. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.002
  • Herzog, W., & Boomsma, A. (2009). Small-sample robust estimators of noncentrality-based and incremental model fit. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/10705510802561279
  • Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 516–519. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003
  • Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2015). When the cat’s away, some mice will play: A basic trait account of dishonest behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 72–88. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.04.003
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Ion, A., Iliescu, D., Aldhafri, S., Rana, N., Ratanadilok, K., Widyanti, A., & Nedelcea, C. (2017). A cross-cultural analysis of personality structure through the lens of the HEXACO model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(1), 25–34. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1187155
  • Jackson, D. N. (1970). A sequential system for personality scale development. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 61–96). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Jackson, D. N. (1971). The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. Psychological Review, 78(3), 229–248. doi:10.1037/h0030852
  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory: Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109–133. doi:10.1007/BF02291393
  • Labouvie, E., & Ruetsch, C. (1995). Testing for equivalence of measurement scales: Simple structure and metric invariance reconsidered. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 63–76. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_4
  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five-factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016
  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO personality inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 182–191. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.182
  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25(5), 543–556. doi:10.1177/1073191116659134
  • Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 169–184. doi:10.1002/per.1860
  • Lee, K., Ogunfowora, B., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Personality traits beyond the Big Five: Are they within the HEXACO space? Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1437–1463. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00354.x
  • Liu, J., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2016). Honesty-Humility. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Germany. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1228-1.
  • MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490–504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490
  • Marcus, B., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big five, or one in addition? Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 1–34. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00063.x
  • Marsh, H. W. (2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology. (pp. 774–798). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Nagengast, B., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B. O., & Dicke, T. (2018). What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 524–545. doi:10.1037/met0000113
  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B. O., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471–491. doi:10.1037/a0019227
  • Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B. O., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 439–476. doi:10.1080/10705510903008220
  • Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1194–1218. doi:10.1037/a0026913
  • Marsh, H. W., Vallerand, R. J., Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Parker, P., Morin, A. J. S., Carbonneau, N., … Paquet, Y. (2013). Passion: Does one scale fit all? Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 796–809. doi:10.1037/a0032573
  • McCrae, R. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 97–112. doi:10.1177/1088868314541857
  • McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T. J., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 552–566. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
  • McDonald, R. P. (1989). An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentrality. Journal of Classification, 6(1), 97–103. doi:10.1007/BF01908590
  • McGrath, R. E. (2016). Measurement invariance in translations of the VIA inventory of strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(3), 187–194. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000248
  • Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
  • Međedović, J., Čolović, P., Dinić, B. M., & Smederevac, S. (2017). The HEXACO personality inventory: Validation and psychometric properties in the Serbian language. Journal of Personality Assessment. Advance Online Publication, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1370426.
  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Moshagen, M. (2012). The model size effect in SEM: Inflated goodness-of-fit statistics are due to the size of the covariance matrix. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(1), 86–98. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.634724
  • Moshagen, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2016). A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 54–60. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.950896
  • Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2014). Faktorstruktur, psychometrische Eigenschaften und Messinvarianz der deutschen Version des 60-Item HEXACO Persönlichkeitsinventars [Factor structure, psychometric properties, and measurement invariance of the German-language version of the 60-item HEXACO personality inventory]. Diagnostica, 60(2), 86–97. doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000112
  • Moshagen, M., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (in press). Meta-analytic investigations of the HEXACO personality inventory(-revised): Reliability generalization, self-observer agreement, intercorrelations, and relations to demographic variables. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
  • Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688. doi:10.1037/rev0000111
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Ogunfowora, B., Bourdage, J. S., & Nguyen, B. (2013). An exploration of the dishonest side of self-monitoring: Links to moral disengagement and unethical business decision making. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 532–544. doi:10.1002/per.1931
  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 401–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
  • Romero, E., Villar, P., & López-Romero, L. (2015). Assessing six factors in Spain: Validation of the HEXACO-100 in relation to the five factor model and other conceptually relevant criteria. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 75–81. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.056
  • Roncero, M., Fornés, G., & Belloch, A. (2016). HEXACO: Una nueva aproximación a la evaluación de la personalidad en Español [HEXACO: A new approach to the personality assessment in Spanish]. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 25(1), 205–217. doi:10.5944/rppc.vol.19.num.1.2014.12929
  • Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1), 31–57. doi:10.1177/0013164413498257
  • Schlotz, W., Yim, I. S., Zoccola, P. M., Jansen, L., & Schulz, P. (2011). The perceived stress reactivity scale: Measurement invariance, stability, and validity in three countries. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 80–94. doi:10.1037/a0021148
  • Steinmetz, H. (2013). Analyzing observed composite differences across groups: Is partial measurement invariance enough? Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 9(1), 1–12.
  • Tatar, A. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) long and short Turkish forms. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 19(Supplement 1), 5–13. doi:10.5455/apd.283098
  • Thalmayer, A. G., & Saucier, G. (2014). The questionnaire big six in 26 nations: Developing cross-culturally applicable big six, big five and big two inventories. European Journal of Personality, 28(5), 482–496. doi:10.1002/per.1969
  • Thielmann, I., & Böhm, R. (2016). Who does (not) participate in intergroup conflict? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 778–787. doi:10.1177/1948550616660160
  • Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015). The traits one can trust: Dissecting reciprocity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(11), 1523–1536. doi:10.1177/0146167215600530
  • Thompson, M. S., & Green, S. B. (2013). Evaluating between-group differences in latent variable means. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 163–218). Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing.
  • Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. doi:10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69. doi:10.1177/109442810031002
  • Wakabayashi, A. (2014). A sixth personality domain that is independent of the Big Five domains: The psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory in a Japanese sample. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12045.
  • Wasti, S. A., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Somer, O. (2008). Six Turkish personality factors and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(6), 665–684. doi:10.1177/0022022108323783
  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10222-009.
  • Záškodná, T., & Dostál, D. (2016). Šestifaktorový model osobnosti a psychometrické vlastnosti Revidovaného osobnostního inventáře HEXACO. [Six-factor model of personality and psychometric properties of The HEXACO personality inventory–revised]. Psychologie a Její Kontexty, 7(2), 31–42.
  • Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. A., Piotrowski, J. P., Cieciuch, J., Calogero, R. M., Van Hiel, A., Argentero, P., … Wills-Herrera, E. (2017). Measurement of psychological entitlement in 28 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(3), 207–217. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000286
  • Zercher, F., Schmidt, P., Cieciuch, J., & Davidov, E. (2015). The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European Social Survey: Exact vs. approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 733.
  • Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015). Honesty and humility. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 169–174). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  • Zhao, K., Ferguson, E., & Smillie, L. D. (2017). Individual differences in good manners rather than compassion predict fair allocations of wealth in the dictator game. Journal of Personality, 85(2), 244–256. doi:10.1111/jopy.12237
  • Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). The role of interpersonal traits in social decision making: Exploring sources of behavioral heterogeneity in economic games. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(3), 277–302. doi:10.1177/1088868314553709

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.