Cross-Validation of the VIA Inventory of Strengths-Revised and its Short Forms

References

• Brdar, I., & Kashdan, T. B. (2010) Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 151–154. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschor, C., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2013). Self- and peer-rated character strengths: How do they relate to satisfaction with life and orientations to happiness? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(2), 116–127. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.758305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90(2), 105–126. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.90.2.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlsgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 203–213. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferragut, M., Blanca, M. J., & Ortiz-Tallo, M. (2014). Psychological virtues during adolescence: A longitudinal study of gender differences. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(5), 521–531. doi:10.1080/17405629.2013.876403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Freidlin, P., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Niemiec, R. M. (2017). Positive psychopathology: Social anxiety via character strengths underuse and overuse. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 50–54. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glorfeld, L. W. (1995). An improvement on Horn’s parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(3), 377–393. doi:10.1177/0013164495055003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindji, R., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, A. K., Stuart, A. D., & Pretorius, H. G. (2010). Biological contributions to wellbeing: The relationships amongst temperament, character strengths and resilience. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 844. doi:10.4102/sajip.v36i2.844
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count, and Flesch reading ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel (Research Branch Report 8-75). Memphis, TN: Chief of Naval Technical Training, Naval Air Station.
   Google Scholar
• Littman-Ovadia, H., & Lavy, S. (2012). Character strengths in Israel: Hebrew adaptation of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(1), 41–50. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littman-Ovadia, H., Lavy, S., & Boiman-Meshita, M. (2016). When theory and research collide: Examining correlates of signature strengths use at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 527–548. doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9739-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, C., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2008). Values in Action Scale and the Big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 787–799. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E. (2014). Scale- and item-level factor analysis of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. Assessment, 21(1), 4–14. doi:10.1177/1073191112450612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E. (2015). Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 407–424. doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.994222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E. (2019). Technical report: The VIA Assessment Suite for Adults: Development and initial evaluation (Rev. ed.). Cincinnati, OH: VIA Institute on Character. Retrieved from https://evada-assets.global.ssl.fastly.net/76d1ea39-a4eb-4270-b9dc-899653415f8f/assets/Technical%20Report%20Revised%20Edition%202019_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E., Greenberg, M. J., & Hall-Simmonds, A. (2018). Scarecrow, Tin Woodsman, and Cowardly Lion: The three-factor model of virtue. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 373–392. doi:10.1080/17439760.2017.1326518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. doi:10.1037/met0000144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemiec, R. M. (2013). VIA character strengths: Research and practice (the first 10 years). In H. H. Knoop & A. Delle Fave (Eds.), Well-being and cultures: Perspectives on positive psychology (pp. 11–30). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, V., Cao, M., Marsh, H. W., Tay, L., & Seligman, M. P. (2017). The factor structure of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): An item-level exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) bifactor analysis. Psychological Assessment, 29(8), 1053–1058. doi:10.1037/pas0000396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, V., Tay, L., & Kuykendall, L. (2018). The development and validation of a measure of character: The CIVIC. The Journal of Positive Psychology , 13(4), 346–372. doi:10.1080/17439760.2017.1291850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. Washington, DC/New York, NY: American Psychological Association/Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2018). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2015). Mapping strengths into virtues: The relation of the 24 VIA-strengths to six ubiquitous virtues. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 460. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS). Journal of Individual Differences, 31(3), 138–149. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350–353. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E. (1998). Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 7(3), 301–317. doi:10.1177/096228029800700306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaziri, H., Tay, L., Keith, M. G., & Pawelski, J. O. (2018). History, literature, and philosophy: A systematic review of positive functioning. Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(6), 695–723. doi:10.1080/17439760.2018.1545041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., Eaton, C. A., & Fava, J. L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In R. E. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41–71). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar