Expanding the Scope of Implicit Personality Assessment: An Examination of the Questionnaire-Based Implicit Association Test (qIAT)

References

• Agosta, S., Ghirardi, V., Zogmaister, C., Castiello, U., & Sartori, G. (2011). Detecting fakers of the autobiographical IAT. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 299–306. doi:10.1002/acp.1691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 533–548. doi:10.1037/a0016229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banse, R., Messer, M., & Fischer, I. (2015). Predicting aggressive behavior with the aggressiveness-IAT. Aggressive Behavior, 41(1), 65–83. doi:10.1002/ab.21574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 668–688. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0410-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, R., & Agerström, J. (2016). A closer look at the discrimination outcomes in the IAT literature. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(4), 278–287. doi:10.1111/sjop.12288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R professional manual: Revised NEO personality and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources. [Database]
   Google Scholar
• Costantini, G., Richetin, J., Borsboom, D., Fried, E. I., Rhemtulla, M., & Perugini, M. (2015). Development of indirect measures of conscientiousness: Combining a facets approach and network analysis. European Journal of Personality, 29(5), 548–567. doi:10.1002/per.2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, C. J., Katz, B. A., & Yovel, I. (2017, September). Explicit and implicit shame aversion predict symptoms of avoidant and borderline personality disorders. Journal of Research in Personality, 71, 13–16. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cuyper, K., De Houwer, J., Vansteelandt, K., Perugini, M., Pieters, G., Claes, L., & Hermans, D. (2017). Using indirect measurement tasks to assess the self-concept of personality: A systematic review and meta-analyses. European Journal of Personality, 31(1), 8–41. doi:10.1002/per.2092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Houwer, J. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 342–353. doi:10.1111/spc3.12111
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 347–368. doi:10.1037/a0014211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model. Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, 1(519), 283–310. http://users.ugent.be/∼jdhouwer/chapterbertram.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., Morrison, M., Phills, C. E., & Galdi, S. (2017). Temporal stability of implicit and explicit measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 300–312. doi:10.1177/0146167216684131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. Guilford Press. [Database]
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grumm, M., & von Collani, G. (2007). Measuring Big-Five personality dimensions with the implicit association test – Implicit personality traits or self-esteem? Personality and Individual Differences, 43(8), 2205–2217. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–1385. doi:10.1177/0146167205275613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, S., Back, M. D., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Reliability of implicit self-esteem measures revisited. European Journal of Personality, 25(3), 239–251. doi:10.1002/per.792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBel, E. P., & Paunonen, S. V. (2011). Sexy but often unreliable: The impact of unreliability on the replicability of experimental findings with implicit measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 570–583. doi:10.1177/0146167211400619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 152–159. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 37–48). Erlbaum. 10.1097/00005053-195311720-00010
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The Role of Constructs in Psychological and Educational Measurement (pp. 49–69). Erlbaum. 10.1097/00005053-195311720-00010
   Google Scholar
• Reimers, S., & Stewart, N. (2007). Adobe Flash as a medium for online experimentation: A test of reaction time measurement capabilities. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 365–370. doi:10.3758/BF03193004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remue, J., De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., Vanderhasselt, M. A., De Raedt, R., Houwer, J. D., … Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). Self-esteem revisited: Performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of self- versus ideal self-related cognitions in dysphoria. Cognition & Emotion, 27(8), 1441–1449. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.786681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., Agosta, S., Zogmaister, C., Ferrara, S. D., & Castiello, U. (2008). How to accurately detect autobiographical events. Psychological Science, 19(8), 772–780. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02156.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmack, U. (2019). The implicit association test: A method in search of a construct. Perspectives on Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/1745691619863798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabel, K., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010). The self-concept: New insights from implicit measurement procedures. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 408–425). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shidlovski, D., Schul, Y., & Mayo, R. (2014). If I imagine it, then it happened: The Implicit Truth Value of imaginary representations. Cognition, 133(3), 517–529. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens, M. C., & Schulze König, S. (2006). Predicting spontaneous big five behavior with Implicit Association Tests. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 13–20. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Prati, V., & Houwer, J. D. (2009). Cheating the lie detector. Psychological Science, 20(4), 410–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02308.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianello, M., Robusto, E., & Anselmi, P. (2010). Implicit conscientiousness predicts academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 452–457. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D. (2009). Know thyself. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 384–389. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S., & Radvansky, G. A. (1999). The comprehension and validation of social information. Psychological Review, 106(1), 89–118. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovel, I., & Friedman, A. (2013). Bridging the gap between explicit and implicit measurement of personality: The questionnaire-based implicit association test. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(1), 76–80. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar