References
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
- American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029889
- American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010 and January 1, 2017). http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
- Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. (1996). Beck depression inventory–II. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/t00742-000
- Blais, M. A., Baity, M. R., & Hopwood, C. J. (2011). Clinical applications of the personality assessment inventory. Routledge.
- Blaser v. Astrue, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22003 (D. Or. 2010).
- Bliessner v. Colvin, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58250 (E.D. Wash. 2015).
- Boccaccini, M., & Brodsky, S. (1999). Diagnostic test usage by forensic psychologists in emotional injury cases. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30(3), 253–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.30.3.253
- Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., Caperton, J. D., & Hawes, S. W. (2009). Field validity of the STATIC-99, and MnSOST-R among sex offenders evaluated for commitment as sexually violent predators. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(4), 278–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017232
- Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., & Duncan, S. A. (2006). Screening for malingering in a criminal-forensic sample with the personality assessment inventory. Psychological Assessment, 18(4), 415–423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.415
- Boccaccini, M. T., Rufino, K. A., Jackson, R. L., & Murrie, D. C. (2013). Personality assessment inventory scores as predictors of misconduct among sex offenders civilly committed as sexually violent predators. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1390–1395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034048
- Bow, J. N., Flens, J. R., & Gould, J. W. (2010). MMPI-2 and MCMI-III in forensic evaluations: A survey of psychologists. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 10(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15228930903173021
- Brown, K. P., Iannelli, R. J., & Marganoff, D. P. (2017). Use of the personality assessment inventory in fitness-for-duty evaluations of physicians. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 465–471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1255950
- Calhoun, P. S., Earnst, K. S., Tucker, D. D., Kirby, A. C., & Beckham, J. C. (2000). Feigning combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder on the personality assessment inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75(2), 338–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_11
- Chadwell v. Astrue, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97789 (N.D. Tex. 2010).
- City of Rockford v. Policemen’s Benevolent & Protective Association, 206 L.R.R.M. 3651 (Ill. Ct. App. 2016).
- Correa, A. A., & Rogers, R. (2010). Cross-cultural applications of the PAI. In M. A. Blais, M. R. Baity, & C. J. Hopwood (Eds.), Clinical applications of the personality assessment inventory (pp. 135–148). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
- Cox, J., Fairfax, C. J., DeMatteo, D., Vitacco, M. J., Kopkin, M. R., Parrott, C. T., & Bownes, E. (2018). An update and expansion on the role of the violence risk appraisal guide and historical clinical risk management-20 in United States case law. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(5), 517–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2376
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
- David v. Saul, 405 F. Supp. 3d 868 (D. Or. 2019).
- Day v. Weinberger, 522 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1975).
- DeMatteo, D., Edens, J. F., Galloway, M., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., & Formon, D. (2014). The role and reliability of the psychopathy checklist—Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: A case law survey. Law and Human Behavior, 38(3), 248–255.
- Department of Human Services v. F.J.S., 315 P.3d 433 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).
- Doe, SORB No. 523480 v. Sex Offender Registry Board, 96 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 (Mass. 2020).
- Edens, J. F., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2017). Taking forensic mental health assessment "out of the lab" and into "the real world": Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 599–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000475
- Edens, J. F., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., DeMatteo, D., & Sörman, K. (2015). How reliable are psychopathy checklist-revised scores in Canadian criminal trials? A case law review. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 447–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000048
- Edens, J. F., Cruise, K. R., & Buffington-Vollum, J. K. (2001). Forensic and correctional applications of the personality assessment inventory. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(4), 519–543. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.457
- Edens, J. F., DeMatteo, D., Kelley, S. E., & Arnold, S. (2018). Personality assessment in forensic psychology. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences (pp. 548–572). SAGE Publications.
- Edens, J. F., Poythress, N. G., & Watkins-Clay, M. M. (2007). Detection of malingering in psychiatric unit and general population prison inmates: A comparison of the PAI, SIMS, and SIRS. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890709336832
- Edens, J. F., & Ruiz, M. A. (2005). Personality assessment inventory interpretive report for correctional settings (PAI-CS) professional manual. PAR, Inc.
- Edens, J. F., & Ruiz, M. A. (2008). Identification of mental disorders in an in-patient prison psychiatric unit: Examining the criterion-related validity of the personality assessment inventory. Psychological Services, 5(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1541-1559.5.2.108
- Elk v. United States, 87 Fed. Cl. 70 (2009).
- Ewert v. Canada, 2015 FC 1093 (2018).
- Fernandez, K., Boccaccini, M. T., & Noland, R. M. (2008). Detecting over- and underreporting of psychopathology with the Spanish-language personality assessment inventory: Findings from a simulation study with bilingual speakers. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.189
- Flores v. Callahan, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106109 (C.D. Cal. 2020).
- Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
- Garcia v. State, Tex. App. LEXIS 3129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).
- Gardner, B. O., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2017). Does the convergent validity of the PAI antisocial features scale depend on offender response style? Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 481–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1296846
- Gardner, B. O., Boccaccini, M. T., Bitting, B. S., & Edens, J. F. (2015). Personality assessment inventory scores as predictors of misconduct, recidivism, and violence: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 534–544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000065
- General Electric Company v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (11th Cir. 1997).
- Graham, J. R. (1993). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology. Oxford University Press.
- Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
- Groth-Marnat, G., & Wright, A. J. (2016). Handbook of psychological assessment (6th ed.). Wiley.
- Harlan, E. R., & Routh, J. (2016). Daubert v. Frye: Admissibility of expert testimony. ABA Publishing.
- Hawes, S., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2009). Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the personality assessment inventory: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015036
- Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Heilbrun, K. (2006). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Heilbrun, K., Grisso, T., & Goldstein, A. M. (2009). Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. Oxford University Press.
- In re B.J., Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1401 (Cal. App. 4th 2011).
- In re Jayden G., Conn. Super. LEXIS 2661 (Conn. Super. 2011).
- In re Marriage of Aamer, Wash. App. LEXIS 1489 (Wash. App. 2017).
- Jackson, R. L., & Hess, D. T. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(4), 425–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900407
- Johnson v. Astrue, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72666 (W.D. Wash. 2012).
- Karberg, J. C., & James, D. J. (2005). Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment of jail inmates, 2002. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- Kelley, S. E. (2018). Examining the predictive validity of DSM-5 personality traits as measured by the personality assessment inventory [Doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University]. Texas A & M University Libraries OAK Trust.
- Kois, L. E., & Chauhan, P. (2016). Forensic evaluators’ self-reported engagement in culturally competent practices. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 15(4), 312–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2016.1228089
- Kois, L. E., Chauhan, P., & Warren, J. I. (2019). Competence to stand trial and criminal responsibility. In N. Brewer & A. B. Douglass (Eds.), Psychological science and the law (pp. 293–317). Guilford Press.
- Kucharski, L. T., Toomey, J. P., Fila, K., & Duncan, S. (2007). Detection of malingering of psychiatric disorder with the personality assessment inventory: An investigation of criminal defendants. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890709336831
- Kumho Tire Company v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (11th Cir. 1999).
- Lally, S. J. (2003). What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(5), 491–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.5.491
- Lowmaster, S. E., & Morey, L. C. (2012). Predicting law enforcement officer job performance with the personality assessment inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.648295
- Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., Slobogin, C., Otto, R. K., Mossman, D., & Condie, L. O. (2018). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
- Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
- Miller, C. S., Kimonis, E. R., Otto, R. K., Kline, S. M., & Wasserman, A. L. (2012). Reliability of risk assessment measures used in sexually violent predator proceedings. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 944–953. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028411
- Millon, T. (1994). Millon clinical multiaxial inventory–III manual (1st ed.). National Computer Systems.
- Mogge, N., Lepage, J., Bell, T., & Ragatz, L. (2010). The negative distortion scale: A new PAI validity scale. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940903174253
- Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Morey, L. C. (2003). Essentials of PAI assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
- Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality assessment inventory: Professional manual (2nd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Morey, L. C., & Quigley, B. D. (2002). The use of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) in assessing offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X02463007
- Morey, L. C., Warner, M. B., & Hopwood, C. J. (2007). The personality assessment inventory: Issues in legal and forensic settings. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Emerging topics and expanding roles (pp. 97–126). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Mullen, K. L., & Edens, J. F. (2008). A case law survey of the personality assessment inventory: Examining its role in civil and criminal trials. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(3), 300–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701885084
- Neal, T. M. S., & Grisso, T. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(12), 1406–1421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814548449
- Neal, T. M. S., Miller, S. L., & Shealy, R. C. (2015). A field study of a comprehensive violence risk assessment battery. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(9), 952–968. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815572252
- Neal, T. M. S., Slobogin, C., Saks, M. J., Faigman, D. L., & Geisinger, K. F. (2019). Psychological assessments in legal contexts: Are courts keeping “junk science” out of the courtroom? Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 20(3), 135–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619888860
- Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
- Otto, R. K., & Heilbrun, K. (2002). The practice of forensic psychology: A look toward the future in light of the past. The American Psychologist, 57(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.1.5
- Patry, M. W., & Magaletta, P. R. (2015). Measuring suicidality using the personality assessment inventory: A convergent validity study with federal inmates. Assessment, 22(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114539381
- Reidy, T. J., Sorensen, J. R., & Davidson, M. (2016). Testing the predictive validity of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) in relation to inmate misconduct and violence. Psychological Assessment, 28(8), 871–884. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000224
- Reynolds, C. R. (2016). Contextualized evidence and empirically based testing and assessment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(4), 410–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12181
- Roberts, M. D. (2008). PAI law enforcement, corrections, and public safety selection report. Par, Inc.
- Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured interview of reported symptoms: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2020). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
- Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Cruise, K. R., Wang, E. W., & Ustad, K. L. (1998). The PAI and feigning: A cautionary note on its use in forensic-correctional settings. Assessment, 5(4), 399–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119800500409
- Ruiz, M. A., Cox, J., Magyar, M. S., & Edens, J. F. (2014). Predictive validity of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) for identifying criminal reoffending following completion of an in-jail addiction treatment program. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 673–678. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035282
- Ruiz, M. A., Douglas, K. S., Edens, J. F., Nikolova, N. L., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Co-occurring mental health and substance use problems in offenders: Implications for risk assessment. Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024623
- Ryba, N. L., & Zapf, P. A. (2011). The influence of psychiatric symptoms and cognitive abilities on competence-related abilities. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.550982
- Siewert v. Colvin, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106646 (W.D. Wash. 2016).
- Sinclair, S. J., Smith, M., Chung, W.-J., Liebman, R., Stein, M. B., Antonius, D., Siefert, C. J., Haggerty, G., & Blais, M. A. (2015). Extending the validity of the personality assessment inventory's (PAI) level of care index (LOCI) in multiple psychiatric settings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.941441
- Skopp, N. A., Edens, J. F., & Ruiz, M. A. (2007). Risk factors for institutional misconduct among incarcerated women: An examination of the criterion-related validity of the personality assessment inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890709336841
- Smith, G. P., & Burger, G. K. (1997). Detection of malingering: Validation of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25(2), 183–189.
- Smith, S. T., Cox, J., Mowle, E. N., & Edens, J. F. (2017). Intentional inattention: Detecting feigned attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on the personality assessment inventory. Psychological Assessment, 29(12), 1447–1457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000435
- Social Security Administration. (n.d.). Listing of impairments - Adult listings (Part A). Retrieved April 20, 2021 from https://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/AdultListings.htm
- Spitaletto, T. M. (1994). The Frye standard finally fries: Has Daubert v. Merrell Dow furthered the use of scientific evidence in our legal system. The Review of Litigation, 14, 315–338.
- State v. Gilbert, Wash. App. LEXIS 740 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).
- Tombaugh, T. N. (2004). Trail making Test A and B: Normative data stratified by age and education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00039-8
- Ulusoy, M., Sahin, N. H., & Erkmen, H. (1998). The Beck anxiety inventory: psychometric properties. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 12(2), 163–172.
- United States v. Jackson, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194201 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
- United States v. Lawson, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54006 (E.D. Ky. 2013).
- Viljoen, J. L., McLachlan, K., & Vincent, G. M. (2010). Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile and adult offenders: A survey of clinical practices. Assessment, 17(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191109359587
- Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Fusco, S. L., & Gershenson, B. G. (2012). Field reliability of the SAVRY with juvenile probation officers: Implications for training. Law and Human Behavior, 36(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093974
- Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale–fourth edition (WAIS-IV). APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/t15169-000
- Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test (WRAT4). Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139242 (D. Or. 2013).
- Wolf Harlow, C. (2003). Education and correctional populations. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/ecp.pdf