References
- Anderson, J. L., Plantz, J., Glocker, S., & Zapf, P. A. (2022). The MacCAT-CA and the ECST-R in competency to stand trial evaluations: A critical review and practical implications. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 281–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.2006671
- Ben-Porath, Y. S., Heilbrun, K., & Rizzo, M. (2022). Using the MMPI-3 in legal settings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.2006672
- Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
- Blais, J., Forth, A. E., & Hare, R. D. (2017). Examining the interrater reliability of the hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised across a large sample of trained raters. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 762–775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000455
- Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., Caperton, J. D., & Hawes, S. W. (2009). Field validity of the STATIC-99, and MnSOST-R among sex offenders evaluated for commitment as sexually violent predators. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(4), 278–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017232
- Briere, J. (1995). Trauma symptom inventory (TSI). Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Briere, J. (2011). Trauma symptom inventory-2 (TSI-2). Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Charles, N. E., Cowell, W., & Gulledge, L. M. (2022). Using the personality assessment inventory-adolescent in legal settings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 192–202. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.2019050
- Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., Naveh-Benjamin, M., Barrouillet, P., Camos, V., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415
- Da Silva Guerreiro, J., Casoni, D., & Costa Santos, J. (2014). Relevance and coherence as measures of quality in forensic psychological reports. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(6), 890–902. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.918077
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L. Ed. 2d 469.
- De Clercq, M., & Vander Laenen, F. (2019). The use of test instruments in forensic report writing – Explorative research in Flanders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 66, 101454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101454
- de Ruiter, C., De Beuf, T., & de Vogel, V. (2020). A nuanced view on the HCR-20 and SPJ violence risk assessment: A response to Silva (2020). eLetter in response to ‘The HCR-20 and violence risk assessment – will a peak of inflated expectations turn to a trough of disillusionment? BJPsych Bulletin, 44(6), 269–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2020.14
- de Vogel, V., De Beuf, T., Shepherd, S., & Schneider, R. D. (2022). Violence risk assessment with the HCR-20V3 in legal contexts: A critical reflection. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.2021925
- DeMatteo, D., Hart, S. D., Heilbrun, K., Boccaccini, M. T., Cunningham, M. D., Douglas, K. S., Dvoskin, J. A., Edens, J. F., Guy, L. S., Murrie, D. C., Otto, R. K., Packer, I. K., & Reidy, T. J. (2020). Statement of concerned experts on the use of the hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000223
- DeMatteo, D., & Olver, M. E. (2022). Use of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in legal contexts: Validity, reliability, admissibility, and evidentiary issues. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1955693
- Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk of violence – User guide. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.
- Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., Nicholls, T. L., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 917–930. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.917
- Edens, J. F., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2017). Taking forensic mental health assessment “out of the lab” and into “the real world”: Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 599–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000475
- Edens, J. F., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., DeMatteo, D., & Sörman, K. (2015). How reliable are Psychopathy Checklist-Revised scores in Canadian criminal trials? A case law review. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 447– 456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000048
- Edmond, G. (2011). The admissibility of incriminating expert opinion evidence in the US, England and Canada. Judicial Officers Bulletin, 23(8), 67–70.
- Everington, C., & Luckasson, R. (1992). Competence assessment for standing trial for defendants with mental retardation: Test manual. IDS Publishing Corp.
- Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales. (2011). Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/expert-evidence-in-criminal-proceedings/.
- Faigman, D. L., Cheng, E. K., Mnookin, J., Murphy, E. E., Sanders, J., & Slobogin, C. (2021). Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony, 2021–2022. Thomson West.
- Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 7.02. (2016). Testimony by expert witnesses. St. Paul: West, MN. www.rulesofevidence.org
- Garb, H. N. (1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment, 6(4), 313–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600402
- Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Nezworski, M. T. (2005). Roots of the Rorschach controversy. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.09.002
- General Electric Co. v Joiner. (1997). 522 U.S. 136.
- Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Dhami, M. K. (2013). A forensic examination of court reports. Australian Psychologist, 48(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00082.x
- Green, D., & Rosenfeld, B. (2011). Evaluating the gold standard: A review and meta-analysis of the structured interview of reported symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021149
- Grisso, T. (1987). The economic and scientific future of forensic psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 42(9), 831–839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.42.9.831
- Grove, W. M., Barden, R. C., Garb, H. N., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). Failure of Rorschach-Comprehensive-System-based testimony to be admissible under the Daubert-Joiner-Kumho standard. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(2), 216–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.8.2.216
- Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist. Multi-Health Systems.
- Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
- Harris, P. B., Boccaccini, M. T., & Rice, A. K. (2017). Field measures of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of recidivism among sexual offenders. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 639–651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000394
- Hart, S. D., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. S. (2016). The structured professional judgement approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. In L. Craig & M. Rettenberger (Volume Eds.) and D. Boer (Series Ed.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment, treatment of sexual offending (Vol. 2, pp. 643–666). Wiley.
- Hawes, S. W., Boccaccini, M. T., & Murrie, D. C. (2013). Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 233–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030391
- Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1999). The MacArthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication (MacCAT-CA). Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Ireland, J. L. (2012). Evaluating expert witness psychological reports: Exploring quality. University of Central Lancashire.
- Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. The American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016755
- Kivisto, A. J., Gacono, C., & Medoff, D. (2013). Does the R-PAS meet standards for forensic use? Considerations with introducing a new Rorschach coding system. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 13(5), 389–410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2013.838106
- Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael. (1999). 526 U.S. 137.
- Lally, S. J. (2003). What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(5), 491–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.5.491
- Lawless, R. M., Robbennolt, J. K., & Ulen, T. S. (2016). Empirical Methods in Law. Wolters Kluwer.
- Line, E. C. N. (2020). Experts screening experts: Are courts effectively gatekeeping psychological assessment evidence? [Master’s Thesis]. Proquest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2445991341?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
- Meaux, L., Cox, J., Edens, J. F., DeMatteo, D., Martinez, A., & Bownes, E. (2022). The Personality Assessment Inventory in US Case Law: A survey and examination of relevance to legal proceedings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1975723
- Meyer, G. J., Erdberg, P., & Shaffer, T. W. (2007). Toward international normative reference data for the Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(sup1), S201–S216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701629342
- Meyer, G. J., Viglione, D. J., Mihura, J. L., Erard, R. E., & Erdberg, P. (2011). Rorschach Performance Assessment System: Administration, coding, interpretation, and technical manual. Rorschach Performance Assessment System LLC.
- Mihura, J. L., Meyer, G. J., Dumitrascu, N., & Bombel, G. (2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the Comprehensive System. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 548–605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029406
- Miller, C. S., Kimonis, E. R., Otto, R. K., Kline, S. M., & Wasserman, A. L. (2012). Reliability of risk assessment measures used in sexually violent predator proceedings. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 944–953. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028411
- Millon, T., Grossman, S., & Millon, C. (2015). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV (MCMI-IV). Pearson Assessments.
- Millon, T., Tringone, R., Grossman, S., & Millon, C. (2020). Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory-II (MACI-II). Pearson Assessments.
- Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory-Adolescent (PAI-A) Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Du Sert, N. P., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 0021–0029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
- Neal, T. M. S., & Grisso, T. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(12), 1406–1421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814548449
- Neal, T. M. S., Miller, S. L., & Shealy, R. C. (2015). A field study of a comprehensive violence risk assessment battery. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(9), 952–968. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815572252
- Neal, T. M., Slobogin, C., Saks, M. J., Faigman, D. L., & Geisinger, K. F. (2019). Psychological assessments in legal contexts: Are courts keeping “junk science” out of the courtroom? Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 20(3), 135–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619888860
- Nicholson, R. A., & Norwood, S. (2000). The quality of forensic psychological assessments, reports, and testimony: Acknowledging the gap between promise and practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005422702678
- Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., Mokros, A., Baskin-Sommers, A., Brand, E., Folino, J., Gacono, C., Gray, N. S., Kiehl, K., Knight, R., Leon-Mayer, E., Logan, M., Meloy, J. R., Roy, S., Salekin, R. T., Snowden, R., Thomson, N., … Yoon, D. (2020). Reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence: A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(4), 490–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000256
- Otto, R. K., & Heilbrun, K. (2002). The practice of forensic psychology: A look toward the future in light of the past. The American Psychologist, 57(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.1.5
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2016). Forensic science in criminal courts: Ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf
- R v J-LJ. (2000). Supreme Court of Canada. 2000 SCC 51.
- Roberts, J. M., Arbisi, P. A., John, M. A., & Seamans, R. N. (2022). The utility of the Trauma Symptom Inventory as a primary and secondary assessment instrument for forensic practice in legal settings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2029461
- Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
- Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Gillard, N. D. (2010). Structured interview of reported symptoms (2nd ed.) Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
- Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C. E., & Sewell, K. W. (2004). Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial-Revised (ECST-R) and professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Schimmel, L. M. C., & Van Koppen, P. J. (2017). Verdachten testen: Testgebruik in de forensische psychologie [Testing suspects: Use of tests in forensic psychology]. De Psycholoog, 52(10), 34–42. https://www.tijdschriftdepsycholoog.nl/wetenschap/verdachten-testen/
- Sellbom, M., Flens, J., Gould, J., Ramnath, R., Tringone, R., & Grossman, S. (2022). The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV (MCMI-IV) and Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory-II (MACI-II) in legal settings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.2013248
- Silva, E. (2020). The HCR-20 and violence risk assessment – Will a peak of inflated expectations turn to a trough of disillusionment? BJPsych Bull, 44(6), 269–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2020.14
- Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., Hurducas, C., Arbach-Lucioni, K., Condemarin, C., Dean, K., Doyle, M., Folino, J. O., Godoy-Cervera, V., Grann, M., Ho, R. M. Y., Large, M. M., Nielsen, L. H., Pham, T. H., Rebocho, M. F., Reeves, K. A., Rettenberger, M., de Ruiter, C., Seewald, K., & Otto, R. K. (2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.922141
- Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884
- Viglione, D. J., de Ruiter, C., King, C. M., Meyer, G. J., Kivisto, A. J., Rubin, B. A., & Hunsley, J. (2022). Legal admissibility of the Rorschach and R-PAS: A review of research, practice, and case law. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2028795
- Wiedemann, M., & Neal, T. M. S. (2021). Let the junk out of the court – Zur kontrolle von testverfahren des sachverstaendigen durch die verfahrensbeteiligten [for the control of test procedures of the expert by those involved in the proceedings]. Zeitschrift Fuer Kindschaftsrecht Und Jugendhilfe [Journal for Child Law and Youth Welfare], 9, 346–355.
- Wood, M. E., Brown, K. P., Bitting, A. R., Slobogin, C., & Bowerman, B. (2022). Legal admissibility of the Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with Mental Retardation (CAST-MR). Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 289–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1951742
- Wood, J. M., Garb, H. N., Nezworski, M. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Duke, M. C. (2015). A second look at the validity of widely used Rorschach indices: Comment on Mihura, Meyer, Dumitrascu, and Bombel (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 236–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036005
- Wygant, D. B., Tylicki, J. L., Disney, L. F., & Connelly, A. I. (2022). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2nd Edition (SIRS-2): Use and admissibility in forensic assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.2006673