Take Their Word for It: The Inventory of Problems Provides Valuable Information on Both Symptom and Performance Validity

References

• Abeare, C. A., Hurtubise, J. L., Cutler, L., Sirianni, C., Brantuo, M., Makhzoum, N., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021). Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(8), 1442–1470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1779348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare, K., Cutler, L., An, K. Y., Razvi, P., Holcomb, M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). BNT-15: Revised performance validity cutoffs and proposed clinical classification ranges. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare, K., Razvi, P., Sirianni, C. D., Giromini, L., Holcomb, M., Cutler, L., Kuzmenka, P., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021). Introducing alternative validity cutoffs to improve the detection of non-credible symptom report on the BRIEF. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09402-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare, K., Romero, K., Cutler, L., Sirianni, C. D., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021). Flipping the script: Measuring both performance validity and cognitive ability with the Forced Choice Recognition trial of the RCFT. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(4), 1373–1408. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211019704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ales, F., & Erdodi, L. (2022). Detecting negative response bias within the Trauma Symptom Inventory–2 (TSI-2): A review of the literature. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09427-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• An, K. Y., Kaploun, K., Erdodi, L. A., & Abeare, C. A. (2017). Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: A comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1217046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, R. P., & Smith, S. R. (2014). Personality assessment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Armistead-Jehle, P., Ingram, P. B., & Morris, N. M. (2020). Personality Assessment Inventory Cognitive Bias Scale: Validation in a military sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(7), 1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashendorf, L. (2019). Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test performance validity indices in a VA polytrauma sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(8), 1388–1402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1543454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banovic, I., Filippi, F., Viglione, D. J., Scrima, F., Zennaro, A., Zappalà, A., & Giromini, L. (2022). Detecting coached feigning of schizophrenia with the Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29) and its memory module (IOP-M): A simulation study on a French community sample. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 21(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2021.1906798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler, E. D. (2015). Neuroimaging as a biomarker in symptom validity and performance validity testing. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 9(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9409-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B., Salazar, X., Lu, P., Warner-Chacon, K., & Razani, J. (2002). The Rey 15-item recognition trial: A technique to enhance sensitivity of the Rey 15-item memorization test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(5), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.5.561.1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boress, K., Gaasedelen, O. J., Croghan, A., Johnson, M. K., Caraher, K., Basso, M. R., & Whiteside, D. M. (2021). Validation of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) scale of scales in a mixed clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1900400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortnik, K. E., Horner, M. D., & Bachman, D. L. (2013). Performance on standard indexes of effort among patients with dementia. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 20(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084282.2012.695757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, A. M., Meyer, S., David, E., Pella, R., Hill, B. D., & Gouvier, W. D. (2009). The vulnerability to coaching across measures of effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(2), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802054151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, S. S., Heilbronner, R. L., & Ruff, R. M. (2014). Psychological assessment of symptom and performance validity, response bias, and malingering: Official position of the Association for Scientific Advancement in Psychological Injury and Law. Psychological Injury and Law, 7(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9198-7
   Google Scholar
• Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Troster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., Reynolds, C. R., & Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity (NAN Policy and Planning Committees). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., Reis, A., Colombarolli, M. S., Pasian, S. R., Miguel, F. K., Erdodi, L. A., Viglione, D. J., & Giromini, L. (2021). Discriminating feigned from credible PTSD symptoms: A validation of a Brazilian version of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, 14(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09403-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz, M. D. (2022). Deception is different: Negative validity test findings do not provide “evidence” for “good effort”. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(6), 1244–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1840633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz, M., & Underhill, J. (2013). Estimated costs of malingered disability. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(7), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz, M. D., Williams, M. A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Bianchini, K. J., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Larrabee, G. J., & Ord, J. S. (2015). Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration policy on validity testing: Guidance and recommendations for change. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1099738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crişan, I., Sava, F. A., Maricuţoiu, L. P., Ciumăgeanu, M. D., Axinia, O., Gîrniceanu, L., & Ciotlăuş, L. (2021). Evaluation of various detection strategies in the assessment of noncredible memory performance: Results of two experimental studies. Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211040105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, L., Abeare, C., Messa, I., Holcomb, M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021). This will only take a minute: Time cutoffs are superior to accuracy cutoffs on the Forced Choice Recognition trial of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1884555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, L., Greenacre, M., Abeare, C. A., Sirianni, C. D., Roth, R. M., & Erdodi, L. (2022). Multivariate models provide an effective psychometric solution to the variability in classification accuracy of D-KEFS Stroop performance validity cutoffs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2022.2073914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W. H. M., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs on neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(8), 771–873. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Merckelbach, H., Boskovic, I., & Jelicic, M. (2020). Do you know people who feign? Proxy respondents about feigned symptoms. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09387-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. J. (2014). Further consideration of Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice: Comparison to the Recognition Memory Test – Words and classification accuracy on a clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1278–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.975844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, A. C., Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., & Arnold, G. (2008). The relationship of IQ to effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(4), 705–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040701440493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, A. C., Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Philpott, L. M., & Hess, R. A. (2009). Dementia and effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040701819050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, J. H. (2012). The efficiency and accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the Test of Memory Malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Aggregating validity indicators: The salience of domain specificity and the indeterminate range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 26(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1384925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A. (2021). Five shades of gray: Conceptual and methodological issues around multivariate models of performance validity. NeuroRehabilitation, 49(2), 179–213. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-218020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Multivariate models of performance validity: The Erdodi Index captures the dual nature of non-credible responding (continuous and categorical). Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221101910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Abeare, C. A., Medoff, B., Seke, K. R., Sagar, S., & Kirsch, N. L. (2018). A single error is one too many: The Forced Choice Recognition trial on the CVLT-II as a measure of performance validity in adults with TBI. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33(7), 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Kirsch, N. L., Lajiness-O’Neill, R., Vingilis, E., & Medoff, B. (2014). Comparing the Recognition Memory Test and the Word Choice Test in a mixed clinical sample: Are they equivalent? Psychological Injury and Law, 7(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9197-8
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., & Lichtenstein, J. D. (2021). Information processing speed tests as PVTs. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment. A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 218–247). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. L., Denning, J. H., & Denney, R. L. (2017). TOMM Trial 1 as a performance validity indicator in a criminal forensic sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1213316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, K., & Vincent, J. (2020). Types of malingering in PTSD: Evidence from a psychological injury paradigm. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09367-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaasedelen, O. J., Whiteside, D. M., Altmaier, E., Welch, C., & Basso, M. R. (2019). The construction and the initial validation of the Cognitive Bias Scale for the Personality Assessment Inventory. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(8), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1612947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gegner, J., Erdodi, L. A., Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Bosi, J., & Brusadelli, E. (2022). An Australian study on feigned mTBI using the Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29), its Memory Module (IOP-M), and the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT). Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 29(5), 1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1864375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2010). Incremental validity of the MMPI-2-RF over-reporting scales and RBS in assessing the veracity of memory complaints. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(4), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acq018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Barbosa, F., Coga, G., Azeredo, A., Viglione, D., & Zennaro, A. (2020a). Using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 27(6), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1570929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., & Viglione, D. J. (2022). Assessing negative response bias with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): A quantitative literature review. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09437-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Lettieri, S. C., Zizolfi, S., Zizolfi, D., Viglione, D. J., Brusadelli, E., Perfetti, B., di Carlo, D. A., & Zennaro, A. (2019). Beyond rare-symptoms endorsement: A clinical comparison simulation study using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, 12(3–4), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09357-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Pignolo, C., Young, G., Drogin, E. Y., Zennaro, A., & Viglione, D. J. (2021). Comparability and validity of the online and in-person administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09406-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2018). A clinical comparison, simulation study testing the validity of SIMS and IOP-29 with an Italian sample. Psychological Injury and Law, 11(4), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-018-9314-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Zennaro, A., Maffei, A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2020b). SVT Meets PVT: Development and initial validation of the Inventory of Problems–Memory (IOP-M). Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09385-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Young, G., & Sellbom, M. (2022). Assessing negative response bias using self-report measures: New articles, new issues. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09444-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2003). Green’s word memory test. Green’s Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Doane, B. M. (2006). Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering in traumatic brain injury: Results of a known-group analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(7), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390500263550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Mathias, C. W., Houston, R. J., & Crouch, J. A. (2002). Detecting malingered pain-related disability: Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040902828272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilmette, T. J., Sweet, J. J., Hebben, N., Koltai, D., Mahone, E. M., Spiegler, B. J., Stucky, K., & Westerveld, M., Conference Participants. (2020). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on uniform labeling of performance test scores. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(3), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1722244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes, S. W., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2009). Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, R. K., Smith, H. H., Lehman, R. A. W., & Vogt, A. T. (1978). Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.5.892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., & Millis, S. R., Conference Participants. (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(7), 1093–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040903155063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, M. J., Roth, R. M., Tyson, B. T., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Critical item (CR) analysis expands the classification accuracy of performance validity tests based on the forced choice paradigm – Replicating previously introduced CR cutoffs within the Word Choice Test. Neuropsychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtubise, J., Baher, T., Messa, I., Cutler, L., Shahein, A., Hastings, M., Carignan-Querqui, M., & Erdodi, L. (2020). Verbal fluency and Digit Span variables as performance validity indicators in experimentally induced malingering and real world patients with TBI. Applied Neuropsychology. Child, 9(4), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2020.1719409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgunaite, G., Giromini, L., Bosi, J., Viglione, D. J., & Zennaro, A. (2022). A clinical comparison simulation study using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Lithuania. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 29(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1725518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelicic, M., Ceunen, E., Peters, M. J., & Merckelbach, H. (2011). Detecting coached feigning using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(9), 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2013). Test of Memory Malingering: Cutoff scores for psychometrically defined malingering groups in a military sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(6), 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2013.804949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N., Boone, K. B., Victor, T., Lu, P., Keatinge, C., & Mitchell, C. (2010). Sensitivity and specificity of a Digit Symbol recognition trial in the identification of response bias. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(5), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1903/arclin/acq040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosky, K. M., Lace, J. W., Austin, T. A., Seitz, D. J., & Clark, B. (2022). The utility of the Wisconsin card sorting test, 64-card version to detect noncredible attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 29(5), 1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1864633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulas, J. F., Axelrod, B. N., & Rinaldi, A. R. (2014). Cross-validation of supplemental Test of Memory Malingering Scores as performance validity measures. Psychological Injury and Law, 7(3), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9200-4
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, J. E., & McCredie, M. N. (2022). Exaggeration or fabrication? Assessment of negative response distortion and malingering with the Personality Assessment Inventory. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09433-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lace, J. W., Grant, A. F., Kosky, K. M., Teague, C. L., Lowell, K. T., & Gfeller, J. D. (2020). Identifying novel embedded performance validity test formulas within the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: A simulation study. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09382-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Performance validity and symptom validity in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 18(4), 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617712000240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Meyers, J. E. (2009). 40 plus or minus 10, a new magical number: Reply to Russel. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(5), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040902796735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, J. D., Erdodi, L. A., & Linnea, K. S. (2017). Introducing a forced-choice recognition task to the California Verbal Learning Test – Children’s Version. Child Neuropsychology, 23(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2015.1135422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, J. D., Greenacre, M. K., Cutler, L., Abeare, K., Baker, S. D., Kent, K. J., Ali, S., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Geographic variation and instrumentation artifacts: In search of confounds in performance validity assessment in adults with mild TBI. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09354-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, W., Coleman, C., Thomassin, K., Southall, C. M., & Lindstrom, J. H. (2011). Simulated dyslexia in postsecondary students: Description and detection using embedded validity indicators. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(2), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2010.537280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American Professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., & Schroeder, R. W. (2020). Base rates of invalid test performance across clinical non-forensic contexts and settings. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., & Schroeder, R. W. (2021). Language tests as performance validity tests. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment. A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 248–263). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., Olsen, D. H., Maloy, H., Boettcher, A., Ernst, N., & Okut, H. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(1), 88–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1637027
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A. (2006). Estimating state IQ: Measurement challenges and preliminary correlates. Intelligence, 34(6), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, X. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten, T., & Merckelbach, H. (2013). Symptom validity testing in somatoform and dissociative disorders: A critical review. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9155-x
   Google Scholar
• Merten, T., & Rogers, R. (2017). An international perspective on feigned mental disabilities: Conceptual issues and continuing controversies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 35(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messa, I., Holcomb, M., Lichtenstein, J., Tyson, B., Roth, R., & Erdodi, L. (2021). They are not destined to fail: A systematic examination of scores on embedded performance validity indicators in patients with intellectual disability. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2020.1865457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) professional manual (2nd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, D. H., Schroeder, R. W., Heinrichs, R. J., & Martin, P. K. (2019). Examination of optimal embedded PVTs within the BVMT-R in an outpatient clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(4), 732–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1501096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ord, A. S., Shura, R. D., Sansone, A. R., Martindale, S. L., Taber, K. H., & Rowland, J. A. (2021). Performance validity and symptom validity tests: Are they measuring different constructs? Neuropsychology, 35(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2009). Advanced Clinical Solutions for the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV – Technical Manual. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pivovarova, E., Rosenfeld, B., Dole, T., Green, D., & Zapf, P. (2009). Are measures of cognitive effort and motivation useful in differentiating feigned from genuine psychiatric symptoms? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8(4), 271–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999011003635514
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. R., Gfeller, J. D., Hendricks, B. L., & Sharland, M. (2004). Detecting symptom- and test-coached malingerers with the Test of Memory Malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(5), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2004.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, J., & Erdodi, L. (2021). The impact of criterion measures on the classification accuracy of TOMM-1. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 28(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.161.1613994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, J. K., An, K. Y., Charles, J., Ali, S., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Rey Complex Figure Test. Psychology & Neuroscience, 12(4), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000175
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2018). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Morey, L. C., & Ustad, K. L. (1996). Detection of feigned mental disorders on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A discriminant analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roma, P., Giromini, L., Burla, F., Ferracuti, S., Viglione, D. J., & Mazza, C. (2020). Ecological validity of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): An Italian study of court-ordered, psychological injury evaluations using the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) as criterion variable. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09368-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüsseler, J., Brett, A., Klaue, U., Sailer, M., & Münte, T. F. (2008). The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment. BMC Neurology, 8(37), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-8-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabelli, A. G., Messa, I., Giromini, L., Lichtenstein, J. D., May, N., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021). Symptom versus performance in patients with mild TBI: Independent sources of non-credible responding. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09400-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. W., Baade, L. E., Peck, C. P., VonDran, E. J., Brockman, C. J., Webster, B. K., & Heinrichs, R. J. (2012). Validation of MMPI-2-RF validity scales in criterion group neuropsychological samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.639314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. W., & Marshall, P. S. (2010). Validation of the Sentence Repetition Test as a measure of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040903369441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., Heinrichs, R. J., & Baade, L. E. (2019). Research methods in performance validity testing studies: Criterion grouping approach impacts study outcomes. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(3), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1484517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharf, A. J., Rogers, R., Williams, M. M., & Henry, S. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting feigned mental disorders and cognitive deficits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(3), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9590-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharland, M. J., & Gfeller, J. D. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practice with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, E. M. S., Slick, D. J., & Iverson, G. L. (2020). Multidimensional malingering criteria for neuropsychological assessment: A 20-year update of the malingered neuropsychological dysfunction criteria. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 735–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shura, R. D., Yoash-Gantz, R. E., Pickett, T. C., McDonald, S. D., & Tupler, L. A. (2021). Relations among performance and symptom validity, mild traumatic brain injury, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptom burden in postdeployment veterans. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09415-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwartz, S. K., Roper, B. L., Arentsen, T. J., Crouse, E. M., & Adler, M. C. (2020). The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version is related to emotional distress, not executive dysfunction, in a veteran sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šömen, M. M., Lesjak, S., Majaron, T., Lavopa, L., Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., & Podlesek, A. (2021). Using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Inventory of Problems Memory (IOP-M) in malingering-related assessments: A study with a Slovenian sample of experimental feigners. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09412-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman, M. A., & Axelrod, B. N. (2015). Embedded measures of performance validity using verbal fluency tests in a clinical sample. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 22(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2013.873439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichner, G., & Wagner, M. T. (2004). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact, cognitively impaired, and elderly patients with dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(3), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00078-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering manual. Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Tylicki, J. L., Rai, J. K., Arends, P., Gervais, R. O., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2021). A comparison of the MMPI-2-RF and PAI overreporting indicators in a civil forensic sample with emphasis on the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and the Cognitive Bias Scale (CBS). Psychological Assessment, 33(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dyke, S. A., Millis, S. R., Axelrod, B. N., & Hanks, R. A. (2013). Assessing effort: Differentiating performance and symptom validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(8), 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2013.835447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., & Giromini, L. (2020). Inventory of problems–29: Professional manual. IOP-Test, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., Giromini, L., & Landis, P. (2017). The development of the Inventory of Problems–29: A brief self-administered measure for discriminating bona fide from feigned psychiatric and cognitive complaints. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1233882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., Giromini, L., Landis, P., McCullaugh, J. M., Pizitz, T. D., O'Brien, S., Wood, S., Connell, K., & Abramsky, A. (2019). Development and validation of the False Disorder Score: The focal scale of the Inventory of Problems–29. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(6), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1492413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, C. L., Giromini, L., Crawford, T. J., Ales, F., Viglione, D. J., & Warmelink, L. (2021). An Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP–29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 28(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1767720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wygant, D. B., Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Rapier, J. L., Allgeier, L. M., & Granacher, R. P. (2011). Association of the MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales with structured malingering criteria. Psychological Injury and Law, 4(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-011-9098-z
   Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2015). Malingering in forensic disability-related assessments: Prevalence 15 ± 15%. Psychological Injury and Law, 8(3), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-015-9232-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. C., Roper, B. L., & Arentsen, T. J. (2016). Validity testing and neuropsychology practice in the VA healthcare system: Results from recent practitioner survey. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1159730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccato, B. G., Tyson, B. T., & Erdodi, L. A. (2018). Early bird fails the PVT? The effects of timing artifacts on performance validity tests. Psychological Assessment, 30(11), 1491–1498. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar