Trait Machiavellianism and Agentic Career Success: A Multi-Measure, Multi-Criteria, Multi-Source Analysis

References

• Abele, A., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content. A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 198–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., Sharps, D.- L., Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2020). People with disagreeable personalities (selfish, combative, and manipulative). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(37), 22780–22786. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005088117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickle, G., Kückelhaus, B., Kranefeld, I., Schütte, N., Genau, H. A., Gansen-Ammann, D.-N., & Wihler, A., (2020). Political skill camouflages Machiavellianism: Career role performance and organizational misbehavior at short and long tenure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103401. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f6t4g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino, M., Long, D., & Turnley, W. (2016). Impression Management in organizations: Critical questions, answers, and areas for future research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 377–406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062337
   Google Scholar
• Christie, J. L., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-174450-2.50006-3
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collison, K. L., Vize, C. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2018). Development and preliminary validation of a Five Factor Model measure of Machiavellianism. Psychological assessment, 30(10), 1401–1407. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietl, E., Meurs, J. A., & Blickle, G. (2017). Do they know how hard I work? Investigating how implicit-explicit achievement orientation, reputation, and political skill affect occupational status. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 120–132. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1225040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djurdjevic, E., Klotz, A. C., Motta, V., da, S. P., Stoverink, A., Koopman, J., Yam, K. C., & Chiang, J. T. (2017). Workplace status: The development and validation of a scale. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1124–1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, T. P. (2017). The Australian Royal Commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse and the Roman Catholic Church. Child abuse & Neglect, 74, 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, T. V., Collison, K. L., Vize, C., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2021). Development and validation of the Super-Short Form of the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory (FFMI-SSF). Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(6), 732–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1878525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Blickle, G., Schneider, P. B., Kramer, J., Zettler, I., Solga, J., Noethen, D., & Meurs, J. A. (2008). Political skill construct and criterion-related validation: A two-study investigation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(7), 744–771. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810896321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33, 290–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Treglown, L. (2021). The dark side of high-fliers: The Dark Triad, high-flier traits, engagement, and subjective success. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 647676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Richards, S., Rangel, L., & Jones, D. N. (2014). Measuring malevolence: Quantitative issues surrounding the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genau, H. A., Blickle, G., Schütte, N., & Meurs, G. A. (2022). Machiavellian leader effectiveness: The moderating role of political skill. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, A. L., & Sellbom, M. (2015). Theoretical and empirical concerns regarding the Dark Triad as a construct. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.5465/256352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, H. J., & Six, B. (1977). Konstruktion einer Machiavellismus-Skala. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 8, 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Heslin, P. A. (2005). Conceptualizing and evaluating career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld, R. R., & Van Scotter, J., II. (2019). Vocational behavior from the dark side. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(Part B), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., & Shelton, D. (1998). A socioanalytic perspective on job performance. Human Performance, 11(2–3), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.1998.9668028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2018). Advances in the treatment of context in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104406
   Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N. (2014). Predatory personalities as behavioral mimics and parasites: Mimicy-Deception Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 9(4), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614535936.PMID: 26173276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary, & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different provocations provoke aggression in psychpaths and narcissists. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609347591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 485–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01767.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2017). MedPower: An interactive tool for the estimation of power in tests of mediation [Computer software]. https://davidakenny.shinyapps.io/MedPower/.
   Google Scholar
• Kückelhaus, B. P., & Blickle, G. (2021). An other perspective on Five Factor Machiavellianism. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(6), 740–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1905652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kückelhaus, B. P., Blickle, G., Kranefeld, I., Körnig, T., & Genau, H. A. (2021). Five Factor Machiavellianism: Validation of a new measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(4), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1784182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., & Back, M. D. (2015). Das dreckige Dutzend und die niederträchtige Neun. Diagnostica, 61(2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. C., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., Berg, J., Sellbom, M., & Edens, J. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., & Smith, S. F. (2015). Successful psychopathy: A scientific status report. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415580297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lvina, E., Johns, G., Treadway, D. C., Blickle, G., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Atay, S., Zettler, I., Solga, J., Noethen, D., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). Measure invariance of the Political Skill Inventory PSI across five cultures. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 12(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595812439870
   Google Scholar
• Machiavelli, N. (1532/1950). The Prince and the discourses (with an introduction by Max Lerner). Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate behavioral Research, 46(5), 816–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.606716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, C. P., Ellen, B. P., & Ferris, G. R. (2018). Social influence opportunity recognition, evaluation, and capitalization: Increased theoretical specification through political skill’s dimensional dynamics. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1926–1952. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316633747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Hyatt, C. S., Maples-Keller, J. L., Carter, N. T., & Lynam, D. R. (2017). Psychopathy and Machiavellianism: A distinction without a difference? Journal of Personality, 85(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, C., Bizumic, B., & Sellbom, M. (2016). The role of Machiavellian views and tactics in psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, C., Bizumic, B., & Sellbom, M. (2018). Nomological network of two-dimensional Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleczek, D., Bergner, S., & Rybnicek, R. (2018). Predicting career success: Is the dark side of personality worth considering? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(6), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2017-0402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollero, C., Fedi, A., & De Piccoli, N. (2016). Gender or occupational status: What counts more for well-being at work? Social Indicators Research, 128(2), 467–480. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11205-015-1039-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. & (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398105
   Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2018). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Corrigendum. Journal of Research in Personality, 74, 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schooler, C., & Schoenbach, C. (1994). Social class, occupational status, occupational self-direction, and job income: A cross-national examination. Sociological Forum, 9(3), 431–458. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF01466317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoss, M. K., & Witt, L. A. (2013). Trait interactions and other configurational approaches to personality. In N. D. Christiansen, & R. P. Tett (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 392–418). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2014). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurk, D., Abele, A., & Vollmer, J. (2015). The career satisfaction scale in context: A test for measurement invariance across four occupational groups. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714535019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treadway, D. C., Shaughnessy, B. A., Breland, J. W., Yang, J., & Reeves, M. (2013). Political skill and the job performance of bullies. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941311321169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. The American Psychologist, 63(3), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettler, I., & Solga, M. (2013). Not enough of a ‘dark’ trait? Linking Machiavellianism to job performance. European Journal of Personality, 27, 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar