Measuring Self-Esteem with Expanded Format in a Fraction of Time: ESE-S and ESE-US

References

• Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Eisenberg, N., & Łaguna, M. (2015). On the factor structure of the Rosenberg (1965) General Self-Esteem Scale. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). Measure of self-esteem. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 115–160). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blatný, M., Urbánek, T., & Osecká, L. (2006). Structure of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale: Three factor solution. Studia Psychologica, 48(4), 371–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brailovskaia, J., & Margraf, J. (2020). How to measure self-esteem with one item? Validation of the German Single-Item Self-Esteem Scale (G-SISE). Current Psychology, 39(6), 2192–2202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9911-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. P., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2004). Narcissism and the non-equivalence of self-esteem measures: A matter of dominance? Journal of Research in Personality, 38(6), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the lifespan: Issues and instrumentation. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cappa, F., Laut, J., Porfiri, M., & Giustiniano, L. (2018). Bring them aboard: Rewarding participation in technology-mediated citizen science projects. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., & Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danner, D., Aichholzer, J., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Fabio, A., & Bucci, O. (2015). Affective profiles in Italian high school students: Life satisfaction, psychological well-being, self-esteem, and optimism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2009). Self-esteem and method effects associated with negatively worded items: Investigating factorial invariance by sex. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510802565403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2011). Self-esteem: Enduring issues and controversies. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 718–746). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2015). Measures of self-esteem. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 131–157). Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J., Jr., & Fowler, F. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2014). Psychometrics: An introduction. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gnambs, T., Scharl, A., & Schroeders, U. (2018). The structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 226(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W., Taylor, B. J., Olchowski, A. E., & Cumsille, P. E. (2006). Planned missing data designs in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 11(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Gray-Little, B., Williams, V. S., & Hancock, T. D. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297235001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2018). The Lifespan Self-Esteem Scale: Initial validation of a new measure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.127838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (2012). Self-perception profile for adolescents: Manual and questionnaires. University of Denver, Department of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Hendin, H. M., & Cheek, J. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray’s Narcism Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00213-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., & Dong, N. (2012). Factor structures of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A meta-analysis of pattern matrices. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(2), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyghebaert-Zouaghi, T., Ntoumanis, N., Berjot, S., & Gillet, N. (2021). Advancing the conceptualization and measurement of psychological need states: A 3 × 3 model based on self-determination theory. Journal of Career Assessment, 29(3), 396–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072720978792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauk, E., Weigle, E., Lehmann, K., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2017). The relationship between grandiose and vulnerable (hypersensitive) narcissism. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1600–1610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, C. C. S., & Meyer, J. P. (2015a). How careless responding and acquiescence response bias can influence construct dimensionality: The case of job satisfaction. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 512–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115571894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, C. C. S., & Meyer, J. P. (2015b). Implications of item keying and item valence for the investigation of construct dimensionality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1022640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernis, M. H. (2001). Following the trail from narcissism to fragile self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 223–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrath, S., Meier, B. P., & Bushman, B. J. (2014). Development and validation of the Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS). PLoS One, 9(8), e103469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liga, F., Ingoglia, S., Cuzzocrea, F., Inguglia, C., Costa, S., Coco, A. L., & Larcan, R. (2020). The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale: Construct and predictive validity in the Italian context. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1504053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindwall, M., Barkoukis, V., Grano, C., Lucidi, F., Raudsepp, L., Liukkonen, J., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2012). Method effects: The problem with negatively versus positively keyed items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(2), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.645936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. (1991). Self-concepts of young children 5 to 8 years of age: Measurement and multidimensional structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children’s self-concepts: A multicohort–multioccasion study. Child Development, 69(4), 1030–1053. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & O’Neill, R. (1984). Self Description Questionnaire III (SDQ III): The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb00227.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, R. P., Coelho, G. L. d., Hanel, P. H. P., de Medeiros, E. D., & da Silva, P. D. G. (2022). The efficient assessment of self-esteem: Proposing the Brief Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(2), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09936-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro-González, D., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2016). How response bias affects the factorial structure of personality self-reports. Psicothema, 28(4), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roid, G. H., & Fitts, W. (1988). Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (TSCS): Revised manual. Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, R. W., Tracy, J. L., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2008). Naturalizing the self. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 421447). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Schriber, R. A. (2008). Assessing self-esteem. In F. T. L. Leong (Ed.), Encyclopedia of counseling. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01038-000
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saris, W., Revilla, M., Krosnick, J. A., & Shaeffer, E. M. (2010). Comparing questions with agree/disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options. Survey Research Methods, 4(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.2682
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
   Google Scholar
• Savalei, V., & Falk, C. F. (2014). Recovering substantive factor loadings in the presence of acquiescence bias: A comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.931800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senol-Durak, E., & Durak, M. (2011). The mediator roles of life satisfaction and self-esteem between the affective components of psychological well-being and the cognitive symptoms of problematic Internet use. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 23–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476503 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9694-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonderen, E. V., Sanderman, R., & Coyne, J. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLoS One, 8(7), e68967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomás, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomás, J. M., Oliver, A., Galiana, L., Sancho, P., & Lila, M. (2013). Explaining method effects associated with negatively worded items in trait and state global and domain-specific self-esteem scales. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(2), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.769394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trzesniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2003). Stability of self-esteem across the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Caprara, G. V., & Tisak, J. (2014). Are method effects permanent or ephemeral in nature? The case of the revised life orientation test. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.859511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vésteinsdóttir, V., Reips, U. D., Joinson, A., & Thorsdottir, F. (2017). An item level evaluation of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale using item response theory on Icelandic Internet panel data and cognitive interviews. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, R. C. (1974). The self-concept: Theory and research on selected topics (Vol. 2). University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, R. C. (1989). Measures of self-concept. University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., Alper, H. E., Nguyen, A. M., Brackbill, R. M., Turner, L., Walker, D. J., Maslow, C. B., & Zweig, K. C. (2017). The effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0353-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeigler-Hill, V. (2013). The importance of self-esteem. In V. Zeigler-Hill (Ed.), Self-esteem (pp. 1–20). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Ou, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., & Wang, H. (2017). CEO humility, narcissism and firm innovation: A paradox perspective on CEO traits. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Noor, R., & Savalei, V. (2016). Examining the effect of reverse worded items on the factor structure of the need for cognition scale. PLoS One, 11(6), e0157795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Savalei, V. (2016). Improving the factor structure of psychological scales: The Expanded format as an alternative to the Likert scale format. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(3), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415596421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Tse, W. W., & Savalei, V. (2019). Improved properties of the Big Five Inventory and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the Expanded format relative to the Likert format. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1286–1297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Zhou, L., & Savalei, V. (2023). Comparing the psychometric properties of a scale across three Likert and three alternative formats: An application to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 83(4), 649–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644221111402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zusman, B. J., & Duby, P. B. (1984). An evaluation of the use of token monetary incentives in enhancing the utility of postsecondary survey research techniques [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA).
   Google Scholar