References
- Brown , G. E. Jr. 1944 . Generality of tracking training , OSRD . Report 4508, NDRC Applied Psychology Panel Memo. No. 9
- Carter , L. F. and Murray , N. L. 1947 . “ A study of the most effective relationship between selected control and indicator movements. Chapter 10 ” . In Psychological research on equipment design , Edited by: Fitts , P. M. Washington, D. C. : U. S. Government Printing Office . Report No. 19, U. S. Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports
- Edwards , A. L. 1950 . Experimental Design in Psychological Research , New York : Rinehart .
- Green , R. F. , Andreas , B. G. and Spragg , S. D. S. Interference effects in compensatory tracking (modified SAM Two-Hand Pursuit Test) as a function of the reversal of the display-control relationships (In preparation.)
- Lewis , D. , McAllister , D. E. and Adams , J. 1951 . Facilitation and interference in performance on the modified Mashburn apparatus: I. The effects of varying the amount of original learning . J. Exp. Psychol , 41 : 247 – 260 .
- Lindquist , E. F. 1947 . Goodness of fit of trend curves and significance of trend differences . Psychometrika , 12 : 65 – 78 .
- McAllister , D. E. August 1950 . The effects of level of learning and of overlearning on proactive and retroactive facilitation and interference , August , ONR, Special Devices Center . Technical Report No. SDC-938–1–8
- McAllister , D. E. and Lewis , D. 1951 . Facilitation and interference in performance on the modified Mashburn apparatus: II. The effects of varying the amount of interpolated learning . J. Exp. Psychol , 41 : 356 – 363 .
- Melton , A. W. , ed. 1947 . Apparatus Tests. Report No. 4, U. S. Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports , Washington, D. C. : U. S. Government Printing Office .
- Mitchell , M. J. H. and Vince , M. A. 1951 . The direction of movement of machine controls . Quart. J. Exp. Psychol , 3 : 24 – 35 .
- Norris , E. B. , Green , R. F. and Spragg , S. D. S. Compensatory tracking performance (modified SAM Two-Hand Pursuit Test) as a function of directions and planes of movement of the control cranks relative to movement of the target (In preparation.)
- Norris , E. B. and Spragg , S. D. S. 1953 . Performance on a following tracking task (modified SAM Two-Hand Coordination Test) as a function of the planes of operation of the controls . J. of Psychol , 35 : 107 – 117 .
- Norris , E. B. and Spragg , S. D. S. 1953 . Performance on a following tracking task (SAM Two-Hand Coordinator Test) as a function of the relations between direction of rotation of controls and direction of movement of display . J. of Psychol , 35 : 119 – 129 .
- Shephard , A. H. and Lewis , D. 1951 . Prior learning as a factor in shaping performance curves . Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. , 37 : 124 – 131 .
- Warrick , M. J. 1947 . “ Direction of movement in the use of control knobs to position visual indicators. Chapter 9 ” . In Psychological Research on Equipment Design , Edited by: Fitts , P. M. Washington, D. C. : U. S. Government Printing Office . Report No. 19, U. S. Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports