The Development and Employment of VTAT's or Pictureless Tat's

References

• Bellak , L. 1952 . “ The Thematic Apperception Test in clinical use ” . In Projective Psychology , Edited by: Abt , L. E. and Bellak , L. 185 – 229 . New York : Knopf .
   Google Scholar
• Lebo , D. 1955 . Immediate affective reaction to TAT cards . J. clin. Psychol. , 11 : 297 – 299 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebo , D. 1958 . Scoring the verbal TAT, with illustrative protocols , Dittoed : Author .
   Google Scholar
• Lebo , D. 1959 . An empirical approach to problems concerning the diagnostic value of a pictureless TAT . J. Proj. Tech. , 23 : 107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lebo , D. and Bruce , R. S. 1960 . Projective methods recommended for use with the blind . J. of Psychol. , 50 : 15 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebo , D. and Harrigan , M. 1957 . Visual and verbal presentation of TAT stimuli . J. Consult. Psychol. , 21 : 339 – 342 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lebo , D. and Sherry , P. J. 1959 . Visual and vocal presentation of TAT descriptions . J. Proj. Tech. , 23 : 59 – 63 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan , C. D. and Murray , H. A. 1935 . A method for investigating fantansies . Arch. Neur. & Psychiat. , 34 : 289 – 306 .
   Google Scholar
• Murray , H. A. 1943 . Thematic Apperception Test Manual , Cambridge : Harvard Univ. Press .
   Google Scholar
• Murray , H. A. 1951 . Uses of the Thematic Apperception Test . Am. J. Psychiat. , 107 : 577 – 581 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbigging , P. L. 1955 . Influence of a stimulus variable on stories told to certain TAT pictures . Canad. J. Psychol. , 9 : 195 – 206 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury , H. 1958 . The Shook-Up Generation , New York : Harper .
   Google Scholar
• Sargent , H. D. 1956 . Insight Test prognosis in successful and unsuccessful rehabilitation of the blind . J. Proj. Tech. , 20 : 429 – 441 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone , D. R. 1955 . Responses to imagined auditory stimuli as compared to recorded sounds . J. Consult. Psychol. , 19 : 254
   PubMedGoogle Scholar