REFERENCES
- Aaker, J.L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.945432
- Aaker, J.L., Benet-Martinez, V., & Garolera, J. (2001). Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 492–508. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.492
- Arpan, L.M., Raney, A.A., & Zivnuska, S. (2003). A cognitive approach to understanding university image. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 8, 97–113. doi: 10.1108/13563280310474535
- Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4278999
- Brewer, C.L. (2006). Undergraduate education in psychology: United States. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 65–71. doi: 10.1080/00207590444000483
- Digman, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the 5-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
- Duarte, P.O., Alves, H.B., & Raposo, M.B. (2010). Understanding university image: A structural equation model approach. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 7, 21–36. doi: 10.1007/s12208-009-0042-9
- Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204. doi: 10.1086/266945
- Kazoleas, D., Kim, Y., & Moffitt, M.A. (2001). Institutional image: A case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6, 205–216. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006148
- Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1–22. doi: 10.2307/1252054
- Kristof-Brown, A.L., Zimmerman, R.D., & Johnson, E.C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
- Lievens, F. (2007). Employer branding in the Belgian army: The importance of instrumental and symbolic beliefs for potential applicants and military employees. Human Resource Management, 46, 51–69. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20145
- Lievens, F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56, 75–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00144.x
- Luque-Martínez, T., & Del Barrio-García, S. (2009). Modelling university image: The teaching staff viewpoint. Public Relations Review, 35, 325–327. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.03.004
- Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1–39. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x
- Shavitt, S. (1990). The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 124–148. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(90)90072-T
- Van Hoye, G., & Saks, A.M. (2011). The instrumental–symbolic framework: Organisational image and attractiveness of potential applicants and their companions at a job fair. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60, 311–335. doi: 10.111/j.1464-0597.2010.00437.x