Holistic Facial Composite Construction and Subsequent Lineup Identification Accuracy: Comparing Adults and Children

References

• Association of Chief Police Officers. ( ACPO; 2009). Facial Identification Guidance. Retrieved from http://www.acpo.police.uk/documents/crime/2009/200911CRIFIG01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, V., Campbell, R. N., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Import, A., Langton, S., McAuley, S., & Wright, R. (2000). Testing face processing skills in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 319–333. doi: 10.1348/026151000165715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassia, V., Picozzi, M., Kuefner, D., Bricolo, E., & Turati, C. (2009). Holistic processing for faces and cars in preschool-aged children and adults: Evidence from the composite effect. Developmental Science, 12, 236–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00765.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxon, P., & Valentine, T. (1997). The effects of the age of eyewitnesses on the accuracy and suggestibility of their testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 415–430. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<415::AID-ACP469>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, G., Shepherd, J. W., Shepherd, J., Flin, R., & Ellis, H. (1986). Training skills in police Photo-FIT operators. Policing, 2, 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G., Tarrant, A., & Flin, R. (1989). Close encounters of the witness kind: Children's memory for a simulated health inspection. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 415–429. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02333.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, G. M., Ellis, H., & Shepherd, J. (1978). Face identification: the influence of delay on accuracy of Photofit construction. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 6, 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, G. M., & Valentine, T. (2007). Facial composites: forensic utility and psychological research. In R.C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology. Volume 2: Memory for People (pp. 59–83). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. P., Gibson, S., & Solomon, C. (2014). The positive influence of creating a holistic facial composite on video line-up identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 634–639. doi: 10.1002/acp.3045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. P., Sulley, L. Solomon, C., & Gibson, S. (2010). A comparison of individual and morphed facial composites created using different systems. In G. Howells, K. Sirlantzis, A. Stoica, T. Huntsberger, & A. T. Arslan (Eds.), 2010 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies (pp. 56–60). Canterbury, UK: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., McGorty, E. K., & Penrod, S. D. (2008). Forgetting the once seen face: Estimating the strength of an eyewitness's memory representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 139–150. doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Heering, A., Houthuys, S., & Rossion, B. (2007). Holistic face processing is mature at 4- years of age: Evidence from the composite face effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 57–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is “special” about face perception. Psychological Review, 105, 482–498. doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, K., & Pezdek, K. (1999). The effect of cognitive interview on face identification accuracy: Release from verbal overshadowing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 340–348. doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flin, R., Markham, R., & Davies, G. (1989). Making faces: Developmental trends in the construction and recognition of photofit face composites. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10, 131–145. doi: 10.1016/0193-3973(89)90001-4
   Google Scholar
• Frowd, C. D., Carson, D., Ness, H., Richardson, J., Morrison, L., Mclanaghan, S., & Hancock, P. (2005). A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 33–52. doi: 10.1080/10683160310001634313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frowd, C. D., Hancock, P. J., Bruce, V., McIntyre, A. H., Pitchford, M., Atkins, R., & Sendrea, G. (2010). Giving crime the “evo”: Catching criminals using EvoFIT facial composites. In G. Howells, K. Sirlantzis, A. Stoica, T. Huntsberger, & A. T. Arslan (Eds.), International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies (pp. 36–43). Canterbury, UK: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gawrylowicz, J., Gabbert, F., Carson, D., Lindsay, W., & Hancock, P. (2012). Holistic versus featural facial composite systems for people with mild intellectual disabilities. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 716–720. doi: 10.1002/acp.2850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasel, L. E., & Wells, G. L. (2007). Catching the bad guy: Morphing composite faces helps. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 193–207. doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9007-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havard, C., & Memon, A. (2013). The Mystery Man can help reduce false identifications for child witnesses: Evidence from video lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 50–59. doi: 10.1002/acp.2870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehn, A., Renken, M. D., Gray, J. M., & Nunez, N. L. (2014). Developmental trends in the process of constructing own- and other-race facial composites. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 148, 287–304. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.794122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempen, K., & Tredoux, C. G. (2012). “Seeing is believing”: The effect of viewing and constructing a composite on identification performance. South African Journal of Psychology, 42, 434–444. doi: 10.1177/008124631204200315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehn, C. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1997). Constructing facial composites with the mac-a-mug pro system. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3, 209–218. doi: 10.1080/10683169708410815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuiston-Surrett, D., Topp, L. D., & Malpass, R. S. (2006). Use of facial composite systems in US law enforcement agencies. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 505–517. DOI:10.1080/10683160500254904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 603–616. doi: 10.1002/acp.728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The Cognitive Interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 16, 340–372. doi.org/10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paine, C., Pike, G. E., Brace, N. A., & Westcott, H. L. (2008). Children making faces: The effect of age and prompts of children's facial composites of unfamiliar faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 455–474. doi: 10.1002/acp.1374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, J. F., & Carranza, L. E. (1989). Eyewitness testimony of children in target-present and target absent lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 133–149. doi: 10.1007/BF01055920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE). (1984). Codes of Practice, Code D (2011). Retrieved from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/police/operational-policing/pace-codes/pace-code-d-2011
   Google Scholar
• Police release efits in hunt for man who told young children in Ashford to get in his white van. (2014, May 22). Kent Online. Retrieved from http://www.kentonline.co.uk/ashford/news/ashford-van-efits-17604/
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Kenney, B., Norton, C., Chalkey, B., Jewett, J., & Davis, K. (1996, March). Building a composite of a stranger: Young children's use of the IdentiKit. Paper presented at the American Psychology Law Society, Hilton Head, SC.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139–156. doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, C. J., Gibson, S. J., & Maylin, M. (2012). EFIT-V: Evolutionary algorithms and computer composites. In C. Wilkinson & C. Rynn (Eds.), Craniofacial Identification (pp. 24–41). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225–245. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Kay, J. B., Grinnell, E., Stansfield, B., & Szechter, L. (1998). Face recognition in young children: When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Visual Cognition, 5, 479–496. doi: 10.1080/713756795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 583–592. doi: 10.3758/BF03211301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tredoux, C. G. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 217–237. doi: 10.1023/A:1025746220886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., Davis, J. P., Thorner, K., Solomon, C., & Gibson, S. (2010). Evolving and combining facial composites: Between-witness and within-witness morphs compared. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(1), 72–86. DOI: 10.1037/a0018801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., Hughes, C., & Munro, R. (2009). Recent developments in eyewitness identification procedures in the United Kingdom. In R. Bull, T. Valentine, & T. Williamson (Eds.), The Handbook of Psychology of Investigative Interviewing. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Charman, S. D., & Olson, E. A. (2005). Building face composites can harm lineup identification performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 147–156. doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.11.3.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125. doi: 10.1177/01461672992512005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar