Power that Builds Others and Power that Breaks: Effects of Power and Humility on Altruism and Incivility in Female Employees

References

• Aime, F., Humphrey, S., DeRue, D. S., & Paul, J. B. (2014). The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 327–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2014). Perspectives on power in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 67–97.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1262–1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1023–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). Honesty-humility, the big five, and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D. (2002). Justice motivation and moral motivation. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life, pp. 91–106. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 413–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., & Coke, J. S. (1981). Empathy: A source of altruistic motivation for helping? In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior: Social, personalify, and developmental perspectives, pp. 167–187. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39, 958–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boje, D. M., Rosile, G. A., Durant, R. A., & Luhman, J. T. (2004). Enron spectacles: A critical dramaturgical analysis. Organization Studies, 25, 751–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdage, J. S., Lee, K., Lee, J., & Shin, K. (2012). Motives for organizational citizenship behavior: Personality correlates and coworker ratings of OCB. Human Performance, 25, 179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 441–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J., Butterfield, K. D., & Skaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23, 14–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Hui, C., & Sego, D. J. (1998). The role of organizational citizenship behavior in turnover: Conceptualization and preliminary tests of key hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 922–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equal oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013). Selective incivility as modern discrimination in organizations: Evidence and impact. Journal of Management, 39, 1579–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Côté, S., Kraus, M. W., Cheng, B. H., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., Lian, H., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on emphatic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 217–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1241–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. S., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Fabio, A., & Gori, A. (2016). Assessing workplace relational civility (WRC) with a new multidimensional “mirror” measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F. (1984). Helping behavior and altruism: An empirical and conceptual overview. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 361–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N. (1991). Values, sympathy, and individual differences: Toward a pluralism of factors influencing altruism and empathy. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 128–131.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 10, 527–539.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, R., & Shaw, J. D. (2009). Self-monitoring, status, and justice-related information flow. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 405–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, S. M., & Aguinis, H. (2005). Accounting for subordinate perceptions of supervisor power: An identity-dependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1069–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, N. J., & Chen, S. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate: Power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological Science, 20, 1406–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power's far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, N. J., Sivanathan, N., Mayer, N. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Power and overconfident decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 249–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedor, D. B., Davis, W. D., Maslyn, J. M., & Mathieson, K. (2001). Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: The roles of source power and recipient self-esteem. Journal of Management, 27, 79–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. J., Ormiston, M. E., & Moon, H. (2010). From approach to inhibition: The influence of power on responses to poor performers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 305–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiol, M., O'Connor, E. J., & Aguinis, H. (2001). All for one and one for all? The development and transfer of power across organizational levels. Academy of Management Review, 26, 224–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 612–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.). (pp. 259–269). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Social power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzaga, G. C., Keltner, D., & Ward, D. (2008). Power in mixed-sex stranger interactions. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1555–1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinote, A. (2007a). Behaviour variability and the situated focus theory of power. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 256–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinote, A. (2007b). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal and Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinote, A. (2007c). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinote, A. (2008). Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful and powerless individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 237–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinote, A., Weick, M., & Cai, A. (2012). Does power magnify the expression of dispositions? Psychological Science, 23, 475–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, A. H. (1963). Community power and urban renewal success. American Journal of Sociology, 68, 422–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., & Heydasch, T. (2012). Personality, punishment and public goods: Strategic shifts towards cooperation as a matter of dispositional honesty-humility. European Journal of Personality, 26, 245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 561–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies, R., Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 561–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, W. A., & Kram, K. E. (1994). Authority at work: Internal models and their organizational consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19, 17–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., Capps, L. M., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C., & Heerey, E. A. (2001). Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 229–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunstman, J. W., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Sexual overperception: Power, mating motives, and biases in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 282–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 279–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaption. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the dark triad and honesty-humility. European Journal of Personality, 27, 169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, J. C., Galinsky, A. D., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2007). Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 200–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J., & Mead, N. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 482–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26, 530–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooijman, M., Van Dijk, W., Ellemers, N., & Van Dijk, E. (2015). Why leaders punish: A power perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 75–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. A., Brotheridge, C. M., & Urbanski, J. C. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations, 58, 1323–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998). Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: The mediational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management, 24, 533–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2006). Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders' social attention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 227–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24, 1517–1538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2013). Compliant sinners, obstinate saints: How power and self-focus determine the effectiveness of social influences in ethical decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 635–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid Mast, M., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 835–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, K. E., Morrison, E. W., Rothman, N. B., & Soll, J. B. (2011). The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 272–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studd, M. V. (1996). Sexual harassment. In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, and conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 54–89). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion. Psychological Science, 19, 1315–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 952–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, D., & Rodriguez-Lopez, A. (2004). Humility as a source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltermuth, S. S., & Flynn, F. J. (2013). Power, moral clarity, and punishment in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1002–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1991). Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G., & Tracey, J. B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2010). Honesty-humility and a person-situation interaction at work. European Journal of Personality, 24, 569–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar