A Short Measure of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory – RSQ17

References

• Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
   Google Scholar
• Bilbao, A., Las Hayas, C., Forero, C. G., Padierna, A., Martin, J., & Quintana, J. M. (2014). Cross-validation study using item response theory: The health-related quality of life for eating disorders questionnaire-short version. Assessment, 21, 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113509004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr, P. J. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST): Introduction. In P. J. Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 1–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corr, P. J., & Cooper, A. J. (2016). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1427–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr, P. J. (2001). Testing problems in JA Gray's personality theory: A commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00028-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Credé, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeShong, H. L., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Miller, J. D., Widiger, T. A., & Lynam, D. R. (2015). Development of a short form of the five-factor borderline inventory. Assessment, 23, 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115581475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller, Structural equation modeling: A second course (Eds.). (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Jackson, C. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity in the workplace: BIS/BAS in business. In P. Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 431–452). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819384.016
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. (2008). Parent rating of the ADHD items of the disruptive behaviour rating scale: Analyses of their IRT properties based on the generalized partial credit model. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A. (1985). The neuropsychology of anxiety. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 7, 201–228. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612848509009455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A., Owen, S., Davis, N. M., & Tsaltas, E. (1983). Psychological and physiological relations between anxiety and impulsivity. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.) The biological basis of impulsivity and sensation seeking (pp. 181–217). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, S. A., Suzuki, T., Lynam, D. R., Crego, C., Widiger, T. A., Miller, J. D., & Samuel, D. B. (2016). Development and examination of the five-factor obsessive-compulsive inventory -short form. Assessment, 25, 56–68. doi:10.1177/1073191116643818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heym, N., Ferguson, E., & Lawrence, C. (2008). An evaluation of the relationship between Gray's revised RST and Eysenck's PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornick, C. W., James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1977). Empirical item keying versus a rational approach to analyzing a psychological climate questionnaire. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100405.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. J. (2009). Jackson-5 scales of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST) and their application to dysfunctional real world outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2, pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konstabel, K., Lönnqvist, J. E., Walkowitz, G., Konstabel, K., & Verkasalo, M. (2012). The ‘Short Five’(S5): Measuring personality traits using comprehensive single items. European Journal of Personality, 26, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, S., Rodriguez, B. F., & Kertz, S. J. (2015). Predicting socially anxious group membership using reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 474–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupić, D., Corr, P. J., Ručević, S., Križanić, V., & Gračanin, A. (2016a). Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupić, D., Gračanin, A., & Corr, P. J. (2016b). The evolution of the behavioural approach system (BAS): Cooperative and competitive resource acquisition strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knyazev, G. G., Slobodskaya, H. R., & Wilson, G. D. (2004). Comparison of the construct validity of the Gray–Wilson personality questionnaire and the BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1565–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. M., & Lambert, M. C. (2006). Measuring social change preferences in African American adolescents. Development of the Measure of Social Change for Adolescents (MOSC-A). Assessment, 13, 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106289032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynam, D. R., Sherman, E. D., Samuel, D. B., Miller, J. D., Few, L. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). Development of a short form of the elemental psychopathy assessment. 20, 659–669. doi:10.1177/1073191113502072
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihić, L., Čolović, P., Ignjatović, I., Smederevac, S., & Novović, Z. (2015). Anxiety between personality and cognition: The gray zone. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morizot, J., Ainsworth, A. T., & Reise, S. P. (2009). Toward modern psychometrics. In R. W. Robins, C. R. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 407–423). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olatunji, B. O., Ebesutani, C., Sawchuk, C. N., McKay, D., Lohr, J. M., & Kleinknecht, R. A. (2012). Development and initial validation of the medical fear survey–short version. Assessment, 19, 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111415368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, M. D., Kramer, M. D., Krueger, F. R., & Markon, K. E. (2013). Optimizing efficiency of psychopathology assessment through quantitative modeling: Development of a brief form of the externalizing spectrum inventory. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1332–1348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A., & Gray, J. A. (2001). Dopamine, appetitive reinforcement, and the neuropsychology of human learning: An individual differences approach. In A. Elias & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Advances in individual differences research (pp. 113–149). Lengerich, Germany: PABST Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Quilty, L. C., & Oakman, J. M. (2004). The assessment of behavioural activation—the relationship between positive emotionality and the behavioural activation system. European Journal of Personality, 18, 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., & Beierlein, C. (2014). Can't we make it any shorter? Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of research in Personality, 41, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, M., Cooper, A. J., Smillie, L. D., Markett, S., & Montag, C. (2015). A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: Psychometric criteria and genetic validation. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2015). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version=1.5.8.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, B., Ortengren, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2006). Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for Latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses, Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1–25. URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v17/i05/ https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores (Psychometrika Monograph Suppl. No. 17). Richmond, VA: Psychometric Society. Retrieved from http://www.psychometrika.org/journal/online/MN17.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sandy, C. J., Gosling, S. D., & Koelkebeck, T. (2014). Psychometric comparison of automated versus rational methods of scale abbreviation: An illustration using a brief measure of values. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled chi – square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, L. J., & Watson, D. (2009). The construct validation approach to personality scale construction. In R. W. Robins, C. R. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 240–258). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smederevac, S., Mitrović, D., Čolović, P., & Nikolašević, Ž. (2014). Validation of the measure of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory constructs. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smillie, L. D., Pickering, D. A., & Jackson, C. J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smillie, L. D., Jackson, C. J., & Dalgleish, L. I. (2006). Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White's (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, W. F. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika, 55, 293–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrubia, R., Avila, C., Molto, J., & Caseras, X. (2001). The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure Gray's anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00183-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tull, M. T., Gratz, K. L., Latzman, R. D., Kimbrel, N. A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2010). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and emotion regulation difficulties: A multimodal investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 989–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, D., Beckers, D. G. J., & Taris, T. W. (2007). Reinforcement sensitivity theory at work: Punishment sensitivity as a dispositional source of job-related stress. European Journal of Personality, 21, 889–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Kruyen, P. (2014). Short scales–Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar