The Importance of Being Honest: Correlating Self-Report Accuracy and Network Centrality with Academic Performance

References

• Albers, C., & Lakens, D. (2018). When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 187–195. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 111–123. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaya, G. (1999). College impact on student learning: Comparing the use of self-reported gains, standardized test scores, and college grades. Research in Higher Education, 40(5), 499–526. doi:10.1023/A:1018744326915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369–1397. doi:10.2307/257037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1&2), 9–30. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battistoni, E. & Fronzetti Colladon, A. (2014). Personality correlates of key roles in informal advice networks. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 63–69. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beretvas, S. N., Meyers, J. L., & Leite, W. L. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 570–589. doi:10.1177/0013164402062004003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 7–10. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. New York, NY: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Buhs, E. S. (2005). Peer rejection, negative peer treatment, and school adjustment: Self-concept and classroom engagement as mediating processes. Journal of School Psychology, 43(5), 407–424. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1057–1068. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00253-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824–844. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1–22. doi:10.1037/h0046743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1596–1603. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapell, M. S., Blanding, Z. B., Silverstein, M. E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A., & McCann, N. (2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 268–274. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J. S., & Gonyea, R. M. (2010). Accuracy of self-reported SAT and ACT test scores: Implications for research. Research in Higher Education, 51(4), 305–319. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9160-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conard, M. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(3), 339–346. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research (Vol. 4). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. L., Dingel, M. J., Dame, L. F., Winchip, J., & Petzold, A. M. (2016). Student social self-efficacy, leadership status, and academic performance in collaborative learning environments. Studies in Higher Education, in press. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1265496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W. K., & Grinter, R. E. (2001). At home with ubiquitous computing: Seven challenges. In International conference on ubiquitous computing (pp. 256–272). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin. doi:10.1007/3-540-45427-6
   Google Scholar
• Everett, M., & Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Extending centrality. In Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 57–76). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811395.004
   Google Scholar
• Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M. H., Shaw, J. D., & Kilduff, M. (2015). Integrating personality and social networks: A Meta-Analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26(4), 1243–1260. doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.0972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115–121. doi:10.3200/JOER.97.3.115-121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flashman, J. (2012). Academic achievement and its impact on friend dynamics. Sociology of Education, 85(1), 61–80. doi:10.1177/0038040711417014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Newstead, S. E. (1995). Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why? Studies in Higher Education, 20(2), 159–172. doi:10.1080/03075079512331381673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fronzetti Colladon, A., Grippa, F., Battistoni, E., Gloor, P. A., & La Bella, A. (2017). What makes you popular: Beauty, personality or intelligence? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, in press. doi:10.1504/IJESB.2018.10008028
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Zhang, J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). The relationship between psychometric and self-estimated intelligence, creativity, personality, and academic achievement. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25(2), 119–145. doi:10.2190/530V-3M9U-7UQ8-FMBG.
   Google Scholar
• Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, R. C. (1954). The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. The Incorporated Statistician, 5(3), 115–127. doi:10.2307/2986645.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 238–262. doi:10.2307/4131473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Salloum, S. J., & Berebitsky, D. (2009). Trust as a mediator of the relationships between poverty, racial composition, and academic achievement: Evidence from Michigan's public elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 292–311. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonyea, R. M. (2005). Self-reported data in institutional research: Review and recommendations. In R. K. Toutkoushian (Series Ed.) & P. D. Umbach (Vol. Ed.). Survey research: Emerging issues. (Vol. 127). New Directions for Institutional Research Series. (pp. 73–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24(1), 13–23. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90011-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grippa, F., & Gloor, P. A. (2009). You are who remembers you. Detecting leadership through accuracy of recall. Social Networks, 31(4), 255–261. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., Carley, K. M., Krackhardt, D., & Wholey, D. (2000). Choosing Work Group Members: Balancing Similarity, Competence, and Familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(2), 226–251. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & Petrini, L. (2011). A new trait on the market: Honesty-Humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 857–862. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, D. L., Jin, J., Newman, D. A., & Boyle, E. H. O. (2015). Why Does Self-Reported Emotional Intelligence Predict Job Performance ? A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Mixed EI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 298–342. doi:10.1037/a0037681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juvonen, J. (2007). Reforming middle schools: Focus on continuity, social connectedness, and engagement. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 197–208. doi:10.1080/00461520701621046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, B. A., & Sereda, L. (1969). Accuracy of self-reported college grade averages and characteristics of non and discrepant reporters. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29(1), 147–155. doi:10.1177/001316446902900110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., Lim, B. C., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 952–963. doi:10.2307/20159634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10(4), 359–381. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(88)90004-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, W. L., & Beretvas, S. N. (2005). Validation of scores on the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale and the balanced inventory of desirable responding. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(1), 140–154. doi:10.1177/0013164404267285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens, F., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2009). Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1514–1535. doi:10.1037/a0016137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of the international personality item pool representation of the revised NEO personality inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1070–1084. doi:10.1037/pas0000004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Stull, A. T., Campbell, J., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., & Knight, A. (2007). Overestimation bias in self-reported SAT scores. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 443–454. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9034-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378. doi:10.1023/A:1014893102151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, J. (2016). Friends with academic benefits. Contexts, 15(3), 22–29. doi:10.1177/1536504216662237.
   Google Scholar
• Mcpherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 121–146. doi:10.2307/2667127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, K. (1992). The suitability of Raven's standard progressive matrices for various groups in South Africa. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(2), 149–159. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90037-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K. H. & Kerr, P. M. (1990). Determinants of Academic Performance: A Multinomial Logit Approach. The Journal of Economic Education, 21(2), 101–111. doi:10.1080/00220485.1990.10844659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, A. R., Kane, K. M., Bernesser, K. J., & Spicker, P. T. (1990). Type A behavior, competitive achievement-striving, and cheating among college students. Psychological Reports, 66(2), 459–465. doi:10.2466/pr0.1990.66.2.459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, G. R. (2011). Using college students' self-reported learning outcomes in scholarly research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(150), 41–58. doi:10.1002/ir.388.
   Google Scholar
• Poropat, A. E. (2014). Other-rated personality and academic performance: Evidence and implications. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 24–32. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R. (2011). Do College Student Surveys Have Any Validity? The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 45–76. doi:10.1353/rhe.2011.0034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. J. J., Raven, J. J. J., & John, & Raven, J. J. J. (2003). Raven progressive matrices. In R. S. McCallum (Ed.), Handbook of nonverbal assessment (pp. 223–237). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_11
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2000). Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. A., Porter, S. R., & Rogers, J. (2017). Understanding student self-reports of academic performance and course-taking behavior. AERA Open, 3(2), 233285841771142. doi:10.1177/2332858417711427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L. & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., Oswald, F. L., Kim, B. H., Imus, A., Merritt, S., Friede, A., & Shivpuri, S. (2007). The use of background and ability profiles to predict college student outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 165–179. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherchan, W., Nepal, S., & Paris, C. (2013). A survey of trust in social networks. ACM Computing Surveys, 45(4), 33. doi:10.1145/2501654.2501661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125–139. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316–325. doi:10.2307/3069458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tasselli, S. & Kilduff, M. (2017). When brokerage between friendship cliques endangers trust: A personality-network fit perspective. Academy of Management Journal, doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, T. J. G. (2016). A note on socially desirable responding. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 224–232. doi:10.1037/cou0000135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppal, N. (2014). Moderation effects of personality and organizational support on the relationship between prior job experience and academic performance of management students. Studies in Higher Education, 39(6), 1022–1038. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.777411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warris, A., & Rafique, R. (2009). Trust in friendship: A comparative analysis of male and female university students. Bulletin of Education & Research, 31(2), 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1525/ae.1997.24.1.219
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202–209. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274. doi:10.1023/A:1018724900565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard, G., & Gramzow, R. H. (2008). Exaggeration in memory: Systematic distortion of self-evaluative information under reduced accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 246–259. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar