Investigating Leader Role Congruity and Counterproductive Work Behavior

References

• Bergerson, A. A. (2007). Exploring the impact of social class on adjustment to college: Anna’s story. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(1), 99–119. doi: 10.1080/09518390600923610
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust. “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In Kramer, R., & Tyler, T (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 246–260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., & Klotz, A. C. (2015). The paradox of the unethical organizational citizen: The link between organizational citizenship behavior and unethical behavior at work. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 45–49. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunetto, Y., Farr-Wharton, R., Ramsay, S., & Shacklock, K. (2010). Supervisor relationships and perceptions of work—family conflict. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 48(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411110368467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822–834. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 249–276. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernyak-Hai, L., & Tziner, A. (2014). Relationships between counterproductive work behavior, perceived justice and climate, occupational status, and leader-member exchange. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 30(1), 1–12. doi: 10.5093/tr2014a1
   Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Abdalla, I. A., … Zhou, J. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00018-1 doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00018-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, 627–647. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.53503267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, M. W., Resick, C., & Hanges, P. J. (2006). Systematic variation in organizationally-shared cognitive prototypes of effective leadership based on organizational form. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinh, J. E., & Lord, R. G. (2013). Current trends in moral research what we know and where to go from here. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 380–385. doi: 10.1177/0963721413486147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R, (Eds.), (2007). Polynomial regression and response surface methodology. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 361–372). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In F. Drasgow & N. W. Schmitt (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E., (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 3. 1577–1613. https://doi.org/10.2307/256822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 988–1010. doi: 10.2307/256956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 858–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 89(2), 293–310. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659–676. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti, R. J., Hansbrough, T. K., Epitropaki, O., & Coyle, P. T. (2017). Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories: Approaches, findings, and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 261–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti, R. J., Knee, R. E., Jr,, & Backert, R. S. (2008). Multi-level implications of framing leadership perceptions as a dynamic process. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti, R. J., Bray, B. C., Thompson, N. J., & Allgood, S. F. (2012). Know thy self, know thy leader: Contributions of a pattern-oriented approach to examining leader perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(4), 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti, R. J., & Lord, R. G. (1987). Prototypes and scripts: The effects of alternative methods of processing information on rating accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(3), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90027-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, T. D. (2006). The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. doi: 10.2307/258214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, R. T., Matthews, R. A., & Walsh, B. M. (2016). The emergence of family‐specific support constructs: Cross‐level effects of family‐supportive supervision and family‐supportive organization perceptions on individual outcomes. Stress and Health, 32(5), 472–484. doi: 10.1002/smi.2643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Wright, R. P., Chiu, W. C., & Wang, C. (2008). Relational schemas as sources of evaluation and misevaluation of leader–member exchanges: Some initial evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 266–282. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker, N. M., & van Dick, R., (2014). Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(6)2. 1154–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litano, M. L., Major, D. A., Landers, R. N., Streets, V. N., & Bass, B. I. (2016). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 802–817. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Luksyte, A., Zhou, L., Shi, J., & Wang, M. (2015). Overqualification and counterproductive work behaviors: Examining a moderated mediation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lyu, Y., Wang, M., Le, J., & Kwan, H. K. (2019). Effects of authentic leadership on work–family balance in China. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(2), 110–123. doi: 10.1108/JMP-08-2018-0340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelloway, E. K., Gottlieb, B. H., & Barham, L. (1999). The source, nature, and direction of work and family conflict: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4(4), 337. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.4.4.337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: A causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1&2), 36–50. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, D. A., Fletcher, T. D., Davis, D. D., & Germano, L. M. (2008). The influence of work‐family culture and workplace relationships on work interference with family: A multilevel model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(7), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, D. A., & Morganson, V. J. (2011). Coping with work–family conflict: A leader–member exchange perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(1), 126–138. doi: 10.1037/a0021727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta‐analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5), 689–725. doi: 10.1002/job.695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.81.4.400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offermann, L. R., Kennedy, J. K., & Wirtz, P. W. (1994). Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(94)90005-1
   Google Scholar
• Rupprecht, E. A., Kueny, C. R., Shoss, M. K., & Metzger, A. J. (2016). Getting what you want: How fit between desired and received leader sensitivity influences emotion and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(4), 443. doi: 10.1037/a0040074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, K. L., Ingram, A., Zagenczyk, T. J., & Shoss, M. K. (2015). Work–family conflict and social undermining behaviour: An examination of PO fit and gender differences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 203–218. doi: 10.1111/joop.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherbaum, C. A., Finlinson, S., Barden, K., & Tamanini, K. (2006). Applications of item response theory to measurement issues in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 366–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, K., & Humiston, G. S. (2015). The role of emotion in workplace incivility. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(4), 390–405. doi: 10.1108/JMP-11-2012-0373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543–554. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shondrick, S. J., & Lord, R. G. (2010). Implicit leadership and followership theories: Dynamic structures for leadership perceptions, memory, and leader-follower processes. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470661628.ch1
   Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. doi: 10.1177/1094428105284955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E., & Che, X. X. (2014). Re-examining citizenship: How the control of measurement artifacts affects observed relationships of organizational citizenship behavior and organizational variables. Human Performance, 27(2), 165–182. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2014.882928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446–460. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topakas, A. (2011). Measurement of implicit leadership theories and their effect on leadership processes and outcomes (Doctoral Dissertation). UK: Aston University.
   Google Scholar
• van Gils, S., van Quaquebeke, N., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010). The X-factor: On the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader–member exchange agreement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 333–363. doi: 10.1080/13594320902978458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Quaquebeke, N., Kerschreiter, R., Buxton, A. E., & van Dick, R. (2010). Two lighthouses to navigate: Effects of ideal and counter-ideal values on follower identification and satisfaction with their leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 293–305. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0222-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Quaquebeke, N., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Second‐generation leader categorization research: How subordinates' self‐and typical leader perceptions moderate leader categorization effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), 1293–1319. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00899.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Quaquebeke, N., van Knippenberg, D., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2011). More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates' self-perceptions in leader categorization processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Quaquebeke, N., van Knippenberg, D., & Eckloff, T. (2011). Individual differences in the leader categorization to openness to influence relationship: The role of followers’ self-perception and social comparison orientation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210391311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P., Sy, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders' conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 822–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam, K. C., Fehr, R., Keng-Highberger, F. T., Klotz, A. C., & Reynolds, S. J. (2016). Out of control: A self-control perspective on the link between surface acting and abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 292. doi: 10.1037/apl0000043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Wang, M. O., & Shi, J. (2012). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 111–113. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar