Examining Contrast Effects in Performance Appraisals: Using Appropriate Controls and Assessing Accuracy

References

• Antonioni , D. Panel discussion: 360-degree feedback gone amok: Where are the data? . Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . San Diego , CA . April .
   Google Scholar
• Atwater , L. E. 1998 . “ The advantages and pitfalls of self-assessment in organizations. ” . In Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice , Edited by: Smither , J. W. 331 – 369 . San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Balzer , W. K. 1986 . Biases in the recording of performance-related information: The effects of initial impression and centrality of the appraisal task . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 37 : 329 – 347 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker , G. and Villanova , P. 1995 . Effects of rating procedure and temporal delay on the magnitude of contrast effects in performance ratings . The Journal of Psychology , 129 : 37 – 43 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardin , H. J. and Beatty , R. W. 1984 . Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work , Boston : Kent .
   Google Scholar
• Bernardin , H. J. and Villanova , P. 1986 . “ Performance appraisal. ” . In Generalizing from laboratory to field settings , Edited by: Locke , E. 43 – 62 . Boston : Heath/Lexington .
   Google Scholar
• Borman , W. C. 1977 . Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performance . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 20 : 238 – 252 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley , M. R. , Villanova , P. and Benson , P. G. 1989 . Contrast effects in performance ratings: Another look across time . Applied Psychology: An International Review , 38 : 131 – 143 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines , E. G. and Zeller , R. A. 1979 . “ Reliability and validity assessment ” . In Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Series No. 07–017 , Beverly Hills and London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland , J. N. , Murphy , K. R. and Williams , R. E. 1989 . Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates . Journal of Applied Psychology , 74 : 130 – 135 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper , W. H. 1981 . Ubiquitous halo . Psychological Bulletin , 90 : 218 – 244 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach , L. J. 1955 . Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity” . Psychological Bulletin , 52 : 177 – 193 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakel , M. D. , Ohnesorge , J. P. and Dunnette , M. D. 1970 . Inter-viewer evaluations of job applicants' resumes as a function of the qualifications of the immediately preceding applicants: An examination of contrast effects . Journal of Applied Psychology , 54 : 27 – 30 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr , P. M. , Sherman , S. J. and Fazio , R. H. 1983 . On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 19 : 323 – 340 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel , G. 1982 . Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, , 2nd ed. , Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice-Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Kingstrom , P. O. and Bass , A. R. 1981 . A critical analysis of studies comparing behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) and other rating formats . Personnel Psychology , 34 : 263 – 289 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravitz , D. A. and Balzer , W. K. 1992 . Context effects in performance appraisal: A methodological critique and empirical study . Journal of Applied Psychology , 77 : 24 – 31 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy , F. J. and Farr , J. L. 1980 . Performance rating . Psychological Bulletin , 87 : 72 – 107 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham , G. P. , Wexley , K. N. and Pursell , E. D. 1975 . Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior . Journal of Applied Psychology , 60 : 550 – 555 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin , L. L. 1986 . Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 : 493 – 504 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin , L. L. and Seta , J. J. 1983 . Perceptions of unity and distinctiveness as determinants of attraction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 44 : 755 – 764 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer , T. J. and Alexander , R. A. 1991 . Contrast effects in behavioral measurement: An investigation of alternative process explanations . Journal of Applied Psychology , 76 : 3 – 10 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy , K. R. and Balzer , W. K. 1986 . Systematic distortions in memory-based behavior ratings and performance evaluations: Consequences for rating accuracy . Journal of Applied Psychology , 71 : 39 – 44 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy , K. R. and Balzer , W. K. 1989 . Rater errors and rating accuracy . Journal of Applied Psychology , 74 : 619 – 624 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy , K. R. , Balzer , W. K. , Lockhart , M. C. and Eisenman , E. J. 1985 . Effects of previous performance on evaluations of present performance . Journal of Applied Psychology , 70 : 72 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy , K. R. , Gannett , B. A. , Herr , B. M. and Chen , J. A. 1986 . Effects of subsequent performance on evaluations of previous performance . Journal of Applied Psychology , 71 : 427 – 431 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach , D. W. and Gupta , N. 1992 . A realistic simulation for assessing the relationships among components of rating accuracy . Journal of Applied Psychology , 77 : 196 – 200 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe , P. M. 1967 . Order effects in assessment decisions . Journal of Applied Psychology , 53 : 170 – 173 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuh , A. J. 1978 . Contrast effect in the interview . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 11 : 195 – 196 .
   Google Scholar
• Smither , J. W. 1998 . “ Lessons learned: Research implications for performance appraisal and management practice. ” . In Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice , Edited by: Smither , J. W. 537 – 547 . San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Smither , J. W. , Reilly , R. R. and Buda , R. 1988 . Effect of prior performance information on ratings of present performance: Contrast versus assimilation revisited . Journal of Applied Psychology , 73 : 487 – 496 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner , D. D. and Rain , J. S. 1989 . Immediate and delayed primacy and recency effects in performance evaluation . Journal of Applied Psychology , 74 : 136 – 142 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven , A. H. , Delbecq , A. L. and Koenig , R. 1976 . Determinants of coordination modes within organizations . American Sociological Review , 41 : 322 – 338 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman , D. A. 1997 . Predictors of employee preferences for multi-rater and groupbased performance appraisal . Group and Organization Management , 22 : 264 – 287 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexley , K. N. , Yukl , G. A. , Kovacs , S. Z. and Sanders , R. E. 1972 . Importance of contrast effects in employment interviews . Journal of Applied Psychology , 56 : 5 – 48 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer , R. S. 1974 . Changes in meaning and halo effects in personality impression formation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 29 : 829 – 835 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar