References
- Box, G. E. P. and Behnken, D. W. (1960). “Some New Three-Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables”. Technometrics 2, pp. 455–475.
- Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1959). “A Basis for the Selection of a Response Surface Design”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 54, pp. 622–654.
- Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1963). “The Choice of a Second Order Rotatable Design”. Biometrika 50, pp. 335–352.
- Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
- Box, G. E. P. and Wilson, K. B. (1951). “On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 13, pp. 1–45.
- Box, M. J. and Draper, N. R. (1971). “Factorial Designs, the Chi prime % Chi Criterion, and Some Related Matters”. Technometrics 13, pp. 731–742.
- Box, M. J. and Draper, N. R. (1974). “On Minimum-Point Second Order Designs”. Technometrics 16, pp. 613–616.
- Draper, N. R. (1982). “Center Points in Second Order Response Surface Designs”. Technometrics 24, pp. 127–133.
- Draper, N. R. (1985). “Small Composite Designs”. Technometrics 27, pp. 173–180.
- Draper, N. R. and Lin, D. K. J. (1990). “Small Response Surface Designs”. Technometrics 32, pp. 187–194.
- Giovannitti-Jensen, A. and Myers, R. H. (1989). “Graphical Assessment of the Prediction Capability of Response Surface Designs”. Technometrics 31, pp. 159–171.
- Hartley, H. O. (1959). “Smallest Composite Design for Quadratic Response Surfaces”. Biometrics 15, pp. 611–624.
- Hoke, A. T. (1974). “Economical Second-Order Designs Based on Irregular Fractions of the 3” Factorial”. Technometrics 17, pp. 375–384.
- Kiefer, J. (1975). “Optimal Design: Variation in Structure and Performance Under Change of Criterion”. Biometrika 62, pp. 277–288.
- Khuri, A. I. and Cornell, J. A. (1987). Response Surfaces. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
- Lucas, J. M. (1974). “Optimum Composite Designs”. Technometrics 16, pp. 561–567.
- Lucas, J. M. (1976). “Which Response Surface Design is Best”. Technometrics 18, pp. 411–417.
- Myers, R. H. (1976). Response Surface Methodology. Department of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
- Nalimov, V. V.; Golikova, T. I.; and Mikeshina, N. G. (1970). “On Practical Use of the Concept of D-Optimality”. Technometrics 12, pp. 799–812.
- Notz, W. (1982). “Minimal Point Second Order Designs”. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 6, pp. 47–58.
- Ott, L. and Cornell, J. A. (1974). “A Comparison of Methods Which Utilize the Integrated M.S.E. Criterion for Constructing Response Surface Designs”. Communications in Statistics 3, pp. 1053–1068.
- Roquemore, K. G. (1976). “Hybrid Designs for Quadratic Response Surfaces”. Technometrics 18, pp. 419–423.
- Vining, G. (1988). “Algorithm for Comparing Response Surface Designs”. Technical Report No. 88–3, Department of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
- Westlake, W. J. (1965). “Composite Designs Based on Irregular Fractions of Factorials”. Biometrics 21, pp. 324–36.