I-Optimal Versus D-Optimal Split-Plot Response Surface Designs

References

• Almimi, A. A.; Kulahci, M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2008). “Follow-Up Designs to Resolve Confounding in Split-Plot Experiments”. Journal of Quality Technology 40, pp. 154–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbari, F. T. and Lucas, J. M. (2008). “Designing and Running Super-Efficient Experiments: Optimum Blocking with One Hard-to-Change Factor”. Journal of Quality Technology 40, pp. 31–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnouts, H. and Goos, P. (2010). “Update Formulas for Split-Plot and Block Designs”. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 54, pp. 3381–3391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, D. R.; Schoen, E. D.; and Sitter, R. R. (2004). “Designing Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments with Few Whole-Plot Factors”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 53, pp. 325–339; “Corrigendum”. 54, pp. 955–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, D. R. and Sitter, R. R. (1999). “Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 41, pp. 62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. (2002). The Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P. (2006). “Optimal Versus Orthogonal and Equivalent-Estimation Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments”. Statistica Neerlandica 60, pp. 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Jones, B. (2011). Optimal Design of Experiments: A Case-Study Approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Lucas, J. M. (2009). “Letter to the Editor”. Technometrics 51, pp. 96–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2001). “Optimal Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 436–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2003). “D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots”. Technometrics 45, pp. 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2004). “Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs” Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, L. M. (1987). “The Application of the Annealing Algorithm to the Construction of Exact Optimal Designs for Linear-Regression Models”. Technometrics 29, pp. 439–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. H. and Sloane, N. J. A. (1991a). “Computer-Generated Minimal (and Larger) Response Surface Designs: (II) The Cube”. http://www2.research.att.com/~njas/doc/meatball.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. H. and Sloane, N. J. A. (1991b). “Computer-Generated Minimal (and Larger) Response Surface Designs: (I) The Sphere”. http://www2.research.att.com/~njas/doc/doeh.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. H. and Sloane, N. J. A. (1993). “A New Approach to the Construction of Optimal Designs”. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 37, pp. 339–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P.; Chen, D.; and Voelkel, J. (1998). “Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 40, pp. 314–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2007). “A Candidate-Set-Free Algorithm for Generating D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C 56, pp. 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (2009). “Split-Plot Design: What, Why, and How”. Journal of Quality Technology 41, pp. 340–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulahci, M. and Bisgaard, S. (2005). “The Use of Plackett–Burman Designs to Construct Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 47, pp. 495–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letsinger, J. D.; Myers, R. H.; and Lentner, M. (1996). “Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharia, H. and Goos, P. (2010). “D-Optimal and D-Efficient Equivalent-Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 42, pp. 358–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, R. G. and Brewster, J. F. (2008). “Optimal Foldover Plans for Two-Level Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 40, pp. 227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. K. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1988). “Simulated Annealing in the Construction of Exact Optimal Design of Experiments”. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Science 8, pp. 329–359.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. K. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1995). “The Coordinate-Exchange Algorithm for Constructing Exact Optimal Experimental Designs”. Technometrics 37, pp. 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (1991). Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2006). “Classes of Split-Plot Response Surface Designs for Equivalent Estimation”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 22, pp. 291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2007a). “Construction of Balanced Equivalent Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 49, pp. 56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2007b). “Unbalanced and Minimal Point Equivalent Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 39, pp. 376–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M.; Jones, B.; Borror, C. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2010). “Generating and Assessing Exact G-Optimal Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 42, pp. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, E.; Jones, B.; and Goos, P. (2011). “A Split-Plot Experiment with Factor-Dependent Whole-Plot Sizes”. Journal of Quality Technology 43, pp. 66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinca, L. A. and Gilmour, S. G. (2001). “Multi-Stratum Response Surface Designs”. Technometrics 43, pp. 25–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, G. G.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2005). “Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure”. Journal of Quality Technology 37, pp. 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar