An Algorithm for Finding D-Efficient Equivalent-Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs

References

• Almimi, A. A.; Kulahci, M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2009). “Checking the Adequacy of Fit of Models from Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 41, pp. 272–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, D. R.; Schoen, E. D.; and Sitter, R. R. (2004). “Designing Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments with Few Whole-Plot Factors”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 53, pp. 325–339. “Corrigendum”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 54, pp. 955–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, D. R. and Sitter, R. R. (1999). “Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 41, pp. 62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, R. P. (1973). Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmour, S. G. and Goos, P. (2009). “Analysis of Data from Nonorthogonal Multi-Stratum Designs in Industrial Experiments”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 58, pp. 467–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. (2006). “Optimal Versus Orthogonal and Equivalent-Estimation Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments”. Statistica Neerlandica 60, pp. 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Jones, B. (2011). Design of Experiments: A Case Study Approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P.; Langhans, I.; and Vandebroek, M. (2006). “Practical Inference from Industrial Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 38, pp. 162–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2001). “Optimal Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 436–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2003). “D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots”. Technometrics 45, pp. 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2004). “Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P.; Chen, D.; and Voelkel, J. (1998). “Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 40, pp. 314–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2007). “A Candidate-Set-Free Algorithm for Generating D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 56, pp. 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2009). “D-Optimal Design of Split-Split-Plot Experiments”. Biometrika 96, pp. 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2012). “I-Optimal Versus D-Optimal Split-Plot Response Surface Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 44, pp. 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (2011). “Efficient Designs with Minimal Aliasing”. Technometrics 53, pp. 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulahci, M. and Bisgaard, S. (2005). “The Use of Plackett– Burman Designs to Construct Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 47, pp. 495–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letsinger, J. D.; Myers, R. H.; and Lentner, M. (1996). “Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharia, H. and Goos, P. (2010). “D-Optimal and D-Efficient Equivalent-Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 42, pp. 358–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, F. W. (1967). “A Necessary and Sufficient Condition that Ordinary Least Squares Estimators Be Best Linear Unbiased”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, pp. 1302–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2006). “Classes of Split-Plot Response Surface Designs for Equivalent Estimation”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 22, pp. 291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2007a). “Construction of Balanced Equivalent Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 49, pp. 56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2007b). “Unbalanced and Minimal Point Equivalent Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 39, pp. 376–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M.; Jones, B.; Borror, C. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2010). “Generating and Assessing Exact G-Optimal Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 42, pp. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, E.; Jones, B.; and Goos, P. (2011). “A Split-Plot Experiment with Factor-Dependent Whole-Plot Sizes”. Journal of Quality Technology 43, pp. 66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, S. R.; Casella, G.; and McCulloch, C. E. (1992). Variance Component Estimation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trinca, L. A. and Gilmour, S. G. (2001). “Multi-Stratum Response Surface Designs”. Technometrics 43, pp. 25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, G. G. and Kowalski, S. M. (2008). “Exact Inference for Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure”. Journal of Quality Technology 40, pp. 394–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, G. G.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2005). “Response Surface Designs within a Split-Plot Structure”. Journal of Quality Technology 37, pp. 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar