Response Surface Methodology Using Split-Plot Definitive Screening Designs

References

• Bingham, D. and Sitter, R. R. (1999a). “Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 29, pp. 62–70.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, D. and Sitter, R. R. (1999b). “Some Theoretical Results for Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs”. The Annals of Statistics 27, pp. 1240–1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, D. and Sitter, R. R. (2001). “Design Issues in Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments”. Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 2–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, D. and Sitter, R. R. (2003). “Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs for Robust Parameter Experiments”. Technometrics 45, pp. 80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. W. and Wu, C. F. J. (2001). “Factor Screening and Response Surface Exploration”. Statistica Sinica 11, pp. 533–604.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, S. D.; Stylianou, S.; and Aggarwal, M. (2013). “Efficient Three-Level Screening Designs Using Weighing Matrices”. Statistics, to appear.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P. (2006). “Optimal Versus Orthogonal and Equivalent-Estimation Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments”. Statistica Neerlandica 60, pp. 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2001). “Optimal Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 436–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2003). “D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots”. Technometrics 45, pp. 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2004). “Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. H. and Sloane, N. J. A. (1991). “Computer-Generated Minimal (and Larger) Response Surface Designs: (II) The Cube”. http://www2.research.att.com/njas/doc/meatball.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, P.; Dechang, C.; and Voelkel, J. O. (1998). “Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Split-Plot Designs”. Technometrics 40, pp. 314–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2012a). “An Algorithm for Finding D-Efficient Equivalent-Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 44, pp. 363–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2012b). “I-Optimal Versus D-Optimal Split-Plot Response Surface Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 44, pp. 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (2009). “Split-Plot Designs: What, Why, and How”. Journal of Quality Technology 41, pp. 340–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (2011). “A Class of Three-Level Designs for Definitive Screening in the Presence of Second-Order Effects”. Journal of Quality Technology 43, pp. 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (2013). “Definitive Screening Designs with Added Two-Level Categorical Factors”. Journal of Quality Technology 45, pp. 121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letsinger, J. D.; Mayers, R. H.; and Lentner, M. (1996). “Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-Y. (2015). “Construction and Selection of the Optimal Balanced Blocked Definitive Screening Design”. Metrika 78, pp. 373–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, F. W. (1967). “A Necessary and Sufficient Condition that Ordinary Least Squares Estimators Be Best Linear Unbiased”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, pp. 1302–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukerjee, R. and Fang, K.-T. (2002). “Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs with Minimum Aberration and Maximum Estimation Capacity”. Statistica Sinica 12, pp. 885–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharia, H. and Goos, P. (2010). “D-Optimal and D-Efficient Equivalent-Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 42, pp. 358–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. (1995). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2006). “Classes of Split-Plot Response Surface Designs for Equivalent Estimation”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 22, pp. 291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2007). “Unbalanced and Minimal Point Equivalent Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 39, pp. 376–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichon, J. G.; Li, W.; and McLeod, R. G. (2012). “Generalized Minimum Aberration Two-Level Split-Plot Designs”. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142, pp. 1407–1414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, G. G.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2005). “Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure”. Journal of Quality Technology 37, pp. 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. F. J. and Hamada, M. S. (2009). Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Optimization, 2nd edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, L.; Lin, D. K. J.; and Bai, F. (2012). “Constructing Definitive Screening Designs Using Conference Matrices”. Journal of Quality Technology 44, pp. 2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar