Optimal Experimental Design for Efficient Optical Manipulation of Magnetic Beads Seeded in a Microwell Array

References

• Atkinson, A. C. and Donev, A. N. (1989). “The Construction of Exact D-Optimum Experimental Designs with Application to Blocking Response Surface Designs”. Biometrika 76 (3), 515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A.; Donev, A.; and Tobias, R. (2007). Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1989). “Computer-Aided Blocking of Factorial and Response Surface Designs”. Technometrics 31, pp. 339–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Donev, A. N. (2006). “Blocking Response Surface Designs”. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51 (2), 1075–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Jones, B. (2011). Optimal Design of Experiments—A Case Study Approach. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P.; Jones, B.; and Syafitri, U. (2016). “I-Optimal Design of Mixture Experiments”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 111, pp. 899–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2001). “D-Optimal Response Surface Designs in the Presence of Random Block Effects”. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 37 (4), pp. 433–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2004). “Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 36 (1), pp. 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2012). “I-Optimal Versus D-Optimal Split-Plot Response Surface Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 44 (2), pp. 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2015). “Optimal Design of Blocked Experiments in the Presence of Supplementary Information About the Blocks”. Journal of Quality Technology 47 (4), pp. 301–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokalj, T.; Perez-Ruiz, E.; and Lammertyn, J. (2015). “Building Bio-Assays with Magnetic Particles on a Digital Microfluidic Platform”. New Biotechnology 32 (5).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (2012). Design and Analysis of Experiments, vol. 2. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Otzen, D. (2011). “Protein-Surfactant Interactions: A Tale of Many States”. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta–Proteins and Proteomics 1814 (5), pp. 562–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patist, A.; Bhagwat, S. S.; Penfield, K. W.; Aikens, P.; and Shah, D. O. (2000). “On the Measurement of Critical Micelle Concentrations of Pure and Technical-Grade Nonionic Surfactants”. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents 3 (1), pp. 53–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissin, D. M.; Kan, C. W.; Campbell, T. G.; Howes, S. C.; Fournier, D. R.; Song, L.; … Duffy, D. C. (2010). “Single-Molecule Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Detects Serum Proteins at Subfemtomolar Concentrations”. Nature Biotechnology 28 (6), pp. 595–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, M.; Jones, B.; Borror, C. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2011). “Generating and Assessing Exact G-Optimal Designs”. Journal of Quality Technology 42 (1), pp. 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin, H. C.; Cornaglia, M.; and Gijs, M. A. (2013). Ultrasensitive Protein Detection: A Case for Microfluidic Magnetic Bead-Based Assays. Lab on a Chip 13 (24), pp. 4711–4739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. H.; Hanlon, D. W.; Provuncher, G. K.; Chang, L.; Song, L.; Patel, P. P.; … Duffy, D. C. (2011). “Fifth-Generation Digital Immunoassay for Prostate-Specific Antigen by Single Molecule Array Technology”. Clinical Chemistry 57 (12), pp. 1712–1721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witters, D.; Knez, K.; Ceyssens, F.; Puers, R.; and Lammertyn, J. (2013). “Digital Microfluidics-Enabled Single-Molecule Detection by Printing and Sealing Single Magnetic Beads in Femtoliter Droplets”. Lab on a Chip 13 (11), pp. 2047–2054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D.; Milutinovic, M. D.; and Walt, D. R. (2015). “Single Molecule Array (Simoa) Assay with Optimal Antibody Pairs for Cytokine Detection in Human Serum Samples”. The Analyst 140 (18), pp. 6277–6282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar