Phase I analysis of high-dimensional covariance matrices based on sparse leading eigenvalues

References

• Bai, Z., D. Jiang, J.-F. Yao, and S. Zheng. 2009. Corrections to LRT on large-dimensional covariance matrix by RMT. The Annals of Statistics 37 (6B):3822–40. doi: 10.1214/09-AOS694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. C., L. A. Jones-Farmer, and N. Billor. 2014. A distribution-free multivariate Phase I location control chart for subgrouped data from elliptical distributions. Technometrics 56 (4):528–38. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2013.879264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, T., and W. Liu. 2011. Adaptive thresholding for sparse covariance matrix estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106 (494):672–84. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, T., W. Liu, and Y. Xia. 2013. Two-sample covariance matrix testing and support recovery in high-dimensional and sparse settings. Journal of the American Statistical Association 108 (501):265–77. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.758041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capizzi, G., and G. Masarotto. 2017. Phase I distribution-free analysis of multivariate data. Technometrics 59 (4):484–95. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2016.1272494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, S., S. Human, and M. Graham. 2008. Phase I statistical process control charts: An overview and some results. Quality Engineering 21 (1):52–62. doi: 10.1080/08982110802445561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J., W. Zhou, W.-X. Zhou, and L. Wang. 2017. Comparing large covariance matrices under weak conditions on the dependence structure and its application to gene clustering. Biometrics 73 (1):31–41. doi: 10.1111/biom.12552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-R., and J.-J H. Shiau. 2015. A distribution-free multivariate control chart for Phase I applications. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 31 (1):97–111. doi: 10.1002/qre.1751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ketelaere, B., M. Hubert, and E. Schmitt. 2015. Overview of PCA-based statistical process-monitoring methods for time-dependent, high-dimensional data. Journal of Quality Technology 47 (4):318–35. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2015.11918137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., L. Shu, H. Zhao, and H. Yeung. 2017. Monitoring multivariate process variability via eigenvalues. Computers & Industrial Engineering 113:269–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Z. Kong, and W. Huang. 2014. High-dimensional process monitoring and change point detection using embedding distributions in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space. IIE Transactions 46 (10):999–1016. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2013.855848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, I. M., and A. Y. Lu. 2009. On consistency and sparsity for principal components analysis in high dimensions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 104 (486):682–93. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.0121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones-Farmer, L. A., V. Jordan, and C. W. Champ. 2009. Distribution-free Phase I control charts for subgroup location. Journal of Quality Technology 41 (3):304–16. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2009.11917784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones-Farmer, L. A., W. H. Woodall, S. H. Steiner, and C. W. Champ. 2014. An overview of Phase I analysis for process improvement and monitoring. Journal of Quality Technology 46 (3):265–80. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2014.11917969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., and S. X. Chen. 2012. Two sample tests for high-dimensional covariance matrices. The Annals of Statistics 40 (2):908–40. doi: 10.1214/12-AOS993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Y. Dai, and Z. Wang. 2014a. Multivariate change point control chart based on data depth for Phase I analysis. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 43 (6):1490–507. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2012.735319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Y. Liu, C. Zou, and W. Jiang. 2014b. A self-starting control chart for high-dimensional short-run processes. International Journal of Production Research 52 (2):445–61. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.832001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and F. Tsung. 2019. A control scheme for monitoring process covariance matrices with more variables than observations. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 35 (1):351–67. 10.1002/qre.2403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., K. Wang, and A. B. Yeh. 2013. Monitoring the covariance matrix via penalized likelihood estimation. IIE Transactions 45 (2):132–46. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2012.663952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maboudou-Tchao, E. M., and V. Agboto. 2013. Monitoring the covariance matrix with fewer observations than variables. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 64:99–112. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maboudou-Tchao, E. M., and N. Diawara. 2013. A lasso chart for monitoring the covariance matrix. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 10 (1):95–114. doi: 10.1080/16843703.2013.11673310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schott, J. R. 2007. A test for the equality of covariance matrices when the dimension is large relative to the sample sizes. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51 (12):6535–42. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, X., F. Tsung, and C. Zou. 2014. A new multivariate EWMA scheme for monitoring covariance matrices. International Journal of Production Research 52 (10):2834–50. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.842019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, L., and J. Fan. 2018. A distribution-free control chart for monitoring high-dimensional processes based on interpoint distances. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 65 (4):317–30. doi: 10.1002/nav.21809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. H., and W. H. Woodall. 2000. Change-point detection of mean vector or covariance matrix shifts using multivariate individual observations. IIE Transactions 32 (6):537–49. doi: 10.1080/07408170008963929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., and W. Jiang. 2009. High-dimensional process monitoring and fault isolation via variable selection. Journal of Quality Technology 41 (3):247–58. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2009.11917780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, A. B., L. Huwang, and C.-W. Wu. 2005. A multivariate EWMA control chart for monitoring process variability with individual observations. IIE Transactions 37 (11):1023–35. doi: 10.1080/07408170500232263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, A. B., L. Huwang, and Y.-F. Wu. 2004. A likelihood-ratio-based EWMA control chart for monitoring variability of multivariate normal processes. IIE Transactions 36 (9):865–79. doi: 10.1080/07408170490473042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, A. B., B. Li, and K. Wang. 2012. Monitoring multivariate process variability with individual observations via penalised likelihood estimation. International Journal of Production Research 50 (22):6624–38. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2012.676684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., J. Lei, B. Devlin, and K. Roeder. 2017. Testing high-dimensional covariance matrices, with application to detecting schizophrenia risk genes. The Annals of Applied Statistics 11 (3):1810–31. doi: 10.1214/17-AOAS1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, C., Z. Wang, X. Zi, and W. Jiang. 2015. An efficient online monitoring method for high-dimensional data streams. Technometrics 57 (3):374–87. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2014.940089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar