Blocking OMARS designs and definitive screening designs

References

• Bisgaard, S. 1994. A note on the definition of resolution for blocked 2k−p designs. Technometrics 36 (3):308–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and D. W. Behnken. 1960. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2 (4):455–75. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and K. B. Wilson. 1951. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 13 (1):1–45. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00067.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulutoglu, D. A., and F. Margot. 2008. Classification of orthogonal arrays by integer programming. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138 (3):654–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capehart, S. R., A. Keha, M. Kulahci, and D. C. Montgomery. 2011. Designing fractional factorial split-plot experiments using integer programming. International Journal of Experimental Design and Process Optimisation 2 (1):34–57. doi: 10.1504/IJEDPO.2011.038050.
   Google Scholar
• Großmann, H., and S. G. Gilmour. 2021. Partially orthogonal blocked three-level response surface designs. Econometrics and Statistics, In Press. doi: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, H. O. 1959. Smallest composite designs for quadratic response surfaces. Biometrics 15 (4):611–24. doi: 10.2307/2527658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and C. J. Nachtsheim. 2011. A class of three-level designs for definitive screening in the presence of second-order effects. Journal of Quality Technology 43 (1):1–14. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2011.11917841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and C. J. Nachtsheim. 2013. Definitive screening designs with added two-level categorical factors. Journal of Quality Technology 45 (2):121–9. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2013.11917921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and C. J. Nachtsheim. 2016. Blocking schemes for definitive screening designs. Technometrics 58 (1):74–83. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2015.1013777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz, E., and A. M. Newman. 2013. Practical guidelines for solving difficult mixed integer linear programs. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science 18 (1):18–32. doi: 10.1016/j.sorms.2012.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Nachtsheim, A. C., W. Shen, and D. K. J. Lin. 2017. Two-level augmented definitive screening designs. Journal of Quality Technology 49 (2):93–107. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2017.11917982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez Ares, J., and P. Goos. 2019. An integer linear programing approach to find trend-robust run orders of experimental designs. Journal of Quality Technology 51 (1):37–50. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2018.1545496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez Ares, J., and P. Goos. 2020. Enumeration and multicriteria selection of orthogonal minimally aliased response surface designs. Technometrics 62 (1):21–36. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2018.1549103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez Ares, J., E. Schoen, and P. Goos. 2023. Orthogonal minimally aliased response surface designs for three-level quantitative factors and two-level categorical factors. Statistica Sinica 33 (1):107–26. doi: 10.5705/ss.202020.0347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockuly, R. A., M. L. Weese, B. J. Smucker, D. J. Edwards, and L. Chang. 2017. Response surface experiments: A meta-analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 164:64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartono, B., P. Goos, and E. Schoen. 2015a. Blocking orthogonal designs with mixed integer linear programming. Technometrics 57 (3):428–39. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2014.938832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartono, B., P. Goos, and E. Schoen. 2015b. Constructing general orthogonal fractional factorial split-plot designs. Technometrics 57 (4):488–502. doi: 10.1080/00401706.2014.958198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, E. D., P. T. Eendebak, A. R. Vazquez, and P. Goos. 2022. Systematic enumeration of definitive screening designs. Statistics and Computing 32 (6):1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11222-022-10171-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitter, R. R., J. Chen, and M. Feder. 1997. Fractional resolution and minimum aberration in blocked 2n−k designs. Technometrics 39 (4):382–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, D. X., C. F. J. Wu, and Y. Chen. 1997. Optimal blocking schemes for 2n and 2n−p designs. Technometrics 39 (3):298–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo-Thanh, N., P. Goos, and E. D. Schoen. 2020. Integer programming approaches to find row-column arrangements of two-level orthogonal experimental designs. IISE Transactions 52 (7):780–96. doi: 10.1080/24725854.2019.1655608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo-Thanh, N., R. Jans, E. D. Schoen, and P. Goos. 2018. Symmetry breaking in mixed integer linear programming formulations for blocking two-level orthogonal experimental designs. Computers & Operations Research 97:96–110. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2018.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, L., D. K. J. Lin, and F. Bai. 2012. Constructing definitive screening designs using conference matrices. Journal of Quality Technology 44 (1):2–8. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2012.11917877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar