Self-Perceptions of Sexual Attractiveness: Satisfaction With Physical Appearance is Not of Primary Importance Across Gender and Sexual Orientation

References

• Ahmetoglu, G. & Swami, V. (2012). Do women prefer “nice guys”? The effect of male dominance behavior on women's ratings of sexual attractiveness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(4), 667–672. doi:10.2224/sbp.2012.40.4.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amos, N. & McCabe, M. P. (2015). Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of sexual attractiveness: Are there differences across gender and sexual orientation? Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. M., Kim, P. Y., Hills, A. & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 960–973. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.73.5.960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, D. A. (2007). Avoiding costly mating mistakes: Ovulatory shifts in personal mate value assessment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(3), 441–455. doi:10.1177/0265407507077232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 19–31. doi:10.1080/00224499809551914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective in human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D. & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9(3), 271–278. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, L. D. & Adler, N. E. (1992). Female and male perceptions of ideal body shapes: Distorted views among Caucasian college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(1), 69–79. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M. & Fazio, R. H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35(10), 867–881. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.10.867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, S. L., Bell, R. J., LaChina, M., Holden, S. L. & Davis, S. R. (2009). The relationship between self-reported sexual satisfaction and general well-being in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6(10), 2690–2697. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01406.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K. & Hanna, R. (1984). Courtship in the personals column: The influence of gender and sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 11(5/6), 363–375. doi:10.1007/BF00287465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P. J. & Parish, A. (2010). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand–U.S. comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 798–806. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, B. J. (1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. In J. H. Barkow L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267–288). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J., Liu, F., Wu, J. & Dai, W. (2004). Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(1537), 347–352. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filiault, S. (2007). Measuring up in the bedroom: Muscle, thinness, and men's sex lives. International Journal of Men's Health, 6(2), 127–142. doi:10.3149/jmh.0602.127
   Google Scholar
• Franzoi, S. L. & Shields, S. A. (1984). The Body Esteem Scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(2), 173–178. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4802_12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, D. A. & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1167–1183. doi:10.1177/0146167207303022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup, G. G. & Frederick, D. A. (2010). The science of sex appeal: An evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 14(3), 240–250. doi:10.1037/a0020451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. (1997). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 169–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, L. T. (1999). The certainty of the sexual self-concept. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 8(4), 263–270.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, L. T. (2006). Perceptions of sexual experience and preferences for dating and marriage. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 15(2), 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, L. T. & Carrigan, D. (1998). Individual and gender differences in sexual self-perceptions. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 10(2), 59–70. doi:10.1300/J056v10n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Gettelman, T. & Thompson, J. K. (1993). Actual differences and stereotypical perceptions in body image and eating disturbance: A comparison of male and female heterosexual and homosexual samples. Sex Roles, 29(7–8), 545–562. doi:10.1007/bf00289327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haavio-Mannila, E. & Purhonen, S. (2001). Slimness and self-rated sexual attractiveness: Comparisons of men and women in two cultures. Journal of Sex Research, 38(2), 102–110. doi:10.1080/00224490109552077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton, E. & Trautner, M. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality and Culture, 15(3), 256–278. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S. E. & Buss, D. M. (2008). The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(5), 635–647. doi:10.1177/0146167207313728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowiak, W. R., Hill, E. M. & Donovan, J. M. (1992). The effects of sex and sexual orientation on attractiveness judgments: An evolutionary interpretation. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13(2), 73–85. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(92)90019-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F. & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Procedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 271(1545), 1213–1217. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, C. F. (1985). Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(1), 61–70. doi:10.2307/3033782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N. P. (2007). Mate preference necessities in long- and short-term mating: People prioritize in themselves what their mates prioritize in them. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(3), 528–535.
   Google Scholar
• Li, N. P. & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 468–489. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. (2008). Determinants and consequences of female attractiveness and sexiness: Realistic tests with restaurant waitresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 737–745. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9379-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, A., Mazur, J. & Keating, C. F. (1984). Military rank attainment of a West Point class: Effects of cadets’ physical features. American Journal of Sociology, 90(1), 125–150. doi:10.1086/228050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, A. L. & McNulty, J. K. (2010). Body image and marital satisfaction: Evidence for the mediating role of sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(2), 156–164. doi:10.1037/a0019063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., … Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394(6696), 884–887. doi:10.1038/29772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujols, Y., Meston, C. M. & Seal, B. N. (2010). The association between sexual satisfaction and body image in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(2), 905–916. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01604.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, P. C. & Berscheid, E. (1995). Gender differences in beliefs about the causes of male and female sexual desire. Personal Relationships, 2(4), 345–358. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00097.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, P. C. & Berscheid, E. (1997). Gender differences in characteristics desired in a potential sexual and marriage partner. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 9(1), 25–37. doi:10.1300/J056v09n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Hickford, C. & Jeffery, L. (2000). Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 125–140. doi:10.1348/000712600161718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. W., Gygax, L., Garcia, S. & Bailey, J. M. (2010). Dissecting “gaydar": Accuracy and the role of masculinity–femininity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(1), 124–140. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9405-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russock, H. I. (2011). An evolutionary interpretation of the effect of gender and sexual orientation on human mate selection preferences, as indicated by an analysis of personal advertisements. Behaviour, 148(3), 307–323. doi:10.1163/000579511X556600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T. & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 730–738. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.52.4.730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P. & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447–458. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siever, M. D. (1994). Sexual orientation and gender as factors in socioculturally acquired vulnerability to body dissatisfaction and eating disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(2), 252–260. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.2.252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, W. Jr., Fisher, T. & Walters, A. (1993). The Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire: An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Annals of Sex Research, 6(1), 27–55. doi:10.1007/bf00849744
   Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T. & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: Univeristy of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, C. R. & Ferguson, G. M. (2012). Sexy dolls, sexy grade-schoolers? Media and maternal influences on young girls’ self-sexualization. Sex Roles, 67(7–8), 463–476. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0183-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–120). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. L., Lamdan, R. M., Siegel, J. E., Shelby, R., Hrywna, M. & Moran-Klimi, K. (2002). Treatment regimen, sexual attractiveness concerns, and psychological adjustment among African-American breast cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 11(6), 505–517. doi:10.1002/pon.616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. M. & Levy, G. D. (2001). Effects of potential partners’ costume and physical attractiveness on sexuality and partner selection. Journal of Psychology, 124(4), 371–389. doi:10.1080/00223980.1990.10543232
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. M. & Wasserman, T. (1997). The perception of sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in variability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(3), 243–268. doi:10.1023/A:1024570814293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. M. & Wasserman, T. (1998). Sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in assessment criteria. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(3), 171–191. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoof, M. H. A., Voorhorst, F. J., Kaptein, M. B. H., Hirasing, R. A., Koppenaal, C. & Schoemaker, J. (2000). Insulin, androgen, and gonadotropin concentrations, body mass index, and waist to hip ratio in the first years after menarche in girls with regular menstrual cycles, irregular menstrual cycles, or oligomenorrhea. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 85(4), 1394–1400. doi:10.1210/jcem.85.4.6543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, T. J. (1996). The relationships between skin color and self-perceived global, physical, and sexual attractiveness, and self-esteem for African-Americans. Journal of Black Psychology, 22(3), 358–373. doi:10.1177/00957984960223006
   Google Scholar
• Wade, T. J. (2000). Evolutionary theory and self-perception: Sex differences in body esteem predictors of self-perceived physical and sexual attractiveness and self-esteem. International Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 36–45. doi:10.1080/002075900399501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, T. J. (2003). Evolutionary theory and African-American self-perception: Sex differences in body-esteem predictors of self-perceived physical and sexual attractiveness, and self-esteem. Journal of Black Psychology, 29(2), 123–141. doi:10.1177/0095798403251227
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2000). Women's body image self-consciousness during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 60–68. doi:10.1080/00224490009552021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. & Allgeier, E. R. (1993). The measurement of sexual-esteem: Investigation of Snell and Papini's (1989) Sexuality Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 27(1), 88–102. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1993.1006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. & Dubois, S. L. (1998). Evolution and sex differences in preferences for short-term mates: Results from a policy capturing study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(3), 153–170. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00006-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. & Hurst, S. R. (1998). Body size, physical attractiveness, and body image among young adult women: Relationships to sexual experience and sexual esteem. Journal of Sex Research, 35(3), 272–281. doi:10.1080/00224499809551943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar