Dating and Hooking Up in College: Meeting Contexts, Sex, and Variation by Gender, Partner's Gender, and Class Standing

References

• Alksnis, C., Desmaris, S. & Wood, E. (1996). Gender differences in scripts for different types of dates. Sex Roles, 34, 321–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., England, P. & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women's orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, B. L. (1989). From front porch to backseat: Courtship in twentieth-century America. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benotsch, E. G., Kalichman, S. & Cage, M. (2002). Men who have met sex partners via the Internet: Prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 177–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolding, G., Davis, M., Hart, G., Sherr, L. & Elford, J. (2007). Where young MSM meet their first sexual partner: The role of the Internet. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 522–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S. & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, F. S. & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 999–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing-Matibag, T. M. & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1196–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, M. (2001). Differences in sexual risk behavior between college students with same-sex and opposite-sex experiences: Results from a national survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 575–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, P., Fitzgibbons Shafer, E. & Fogerty, A. C. K. (2007). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today's college campuses. In M. S. Kimmel (Ed.), The Gendered Society Reader (pp. 531–547). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• England, P. & Thomas, R. (2007). The decline of the date and the rise of the hook-up. In A. Skolnick & J. Skolnick (Eds.), Family in transition (pp. 151–162). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fielder, R. L. & Carey, M. P. (2010). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 36, 346–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack, W., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D'Aureli, N. R., Giglioti, S. N., … Stine, E. R. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R. & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 2, 192–208.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G. & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grazian, D. (2007). The girl hunt: Urban nightlight and the performance of masculinity as collectivity activity. Symbolic Interaction, 30, 221–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P. & Harper, M. S. (2006). The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 255–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grov, C., Parsons, J. T. & Bimbi, D. S. (2007). Sexual risk behavior and venues for meeting sex partners: An intercept survey of gay and bisexual men in LA and NYC. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 915–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 57, 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldman, C. & Wade, L. (2010). Hook-up culture: Setting a new research agenda. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7, 323–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, E. S. & Mewhinney, D.-M. K. (1993). Gender differences in casual sex and AIDS prevention: A survey of dating bars. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinkenberg, D. & Rose, S. (1994). Dating scripts of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 26(4), 23–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S. & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking-up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O., Ellingson, S., Mahay, J., Paik, A. & Youm, Y. (2004). The sexual organization of the city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D. N. (Ed.). (1971). Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms: Selected writings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahay, J. & Laumann, E. O. (2004). Meeting and mating over the life course. In E. O. Laumann S. Ellingson J. Mahay A. Paik & Y. Youm (Eds.), The sexual organization of the city (pp. 127–164). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maticka-Tyndale, E., Herold, E. S. & Mewhinney, D. (1998). Casual sex on spring break: Intentions and behaviors of Canadian students. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 254–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L. & Chervany, N. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L. & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of “casual” sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students' hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B. & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students' spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante, R. F. (2006). Sexualities in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raley, R. K. & Bratter, J. (2004). Not even if you were the last person on earth! How marital search constraints affect the likelihood of marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnerus, M. & Uecker, J. (2011). Premarital sex in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, L. J., Taylor, V., Regev-Messalem, S., Fogarty, A. & England, P. (2014). Queer women in the hookup scene: Beyond the closet? Gender and Society, 28(2), 212–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W. & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences, and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 491–497.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, B. (2003). Sex, fear, and greed: A social dilemma analysis of gender and cooperation. Social Forces, 82, 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut! Growing up female with a bad reputation. New York, NY: Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Uecker, J. E. & Regnerus, M. D. (2010). Bare market: Campus sex ratios, romantic relationships, and sexual behavior. Sociological Quarterly, 51, 408–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S. & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath, M. & Torgersen, S. (2002). Who takes health risks? A probe into eight personality types. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1185–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar