Evidence for the Absence of Stimulus Quality Differences in Tests of the Accuracy of Sexual Orientation Judgments: A Reply to Cox, Devine, Bischmann, and Hyde (2016)

References

• Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. (1999). Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 538‒547. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Riva, P., & Rule, N. O. (2013). Familiarity increases the accuracy of categorizing male sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 193‒195. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, W. T. L., Devine, P. G., Bischmann, A. A., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Inferences about sexual orientation: The roles of stereotypes, faces, and the gaydar myth. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 157–171. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1015714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, J. Y. C., & Rule, N. O. (2012). Gay, straight, or somewhere in between: Accuracy and bias in the perception of bisexual faces. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36, 165‒176. doi:10.1007/s10919-011-0129-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441. doi:10.1111/jcmc.2006.11.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66. doi:10.1177/1529100612436522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., Johnson, K. L., Ambady, N., & Rule, N. O. (2010). Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1318‒1331. doi:10.1177/0146167210378755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. M., & Bremme, R. (2011). The effects of facial symmetry and sexually dimorphic facial proportions on assessments of sexual orientation. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 5, 214–230. doi:10.1037/h0099261
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Ghavami, N. (2011). At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: What race categories communicate about sexual orientation. PLoS ONE, 6, e18025. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., Gill, S., Reichman, V., & Tassinary, L. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 321‒334. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeVay, S. (2011). Gay, straight, and the reason why: The science of sexual orientation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lick, D. J., Johnson, K. L., & Gill, S. V. (2013). Deliberate changes to gendered body motion influence basic social perceptions. Social Cognition, 31, 656–671. doi:10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, M., Lynch, A., Brewer, G., & Bruno, D. (2014). Detection of sexual orientation (“gaydar”) by homosexual and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 345–352. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0144-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2012). No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 12, 4695–4708. doi:10.1109/TIP.2012.2214050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendall, D., Vasey, P. L., & McKenzie, J. (2008). The Queen’s English: An alternative biosocial hypothesis for the distinctive features of “gay speech.” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 188–204. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9269-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. A., Gygax, L., & Bailey, J. M. (2008). Sexual orientation and childhood gender nonconformity: Evidence from home videos. Developmental Psychology, 44, 46–58. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., Gygax, L., Garcia, S., & Bailey, J. M. (2010). Dissecting “gaydar”: Accuracy and the role of masculinity-femininity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 124–140. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9405-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O. (in press). Perceptions of sexual orientation from minimal cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0779-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O. (2011). The influence of target and perceiver race in the categorization of male sexual orientation. Perception, 40, 830‒839. doi:10.1068/p7001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50-ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100‒1105. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., Jr., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Us and them: Memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 687–692. doi:10.3758/BF03196822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., Jr., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019‒1028. doi:10.1037/a0013194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., & Hallett, K. C. (2009). Female sexual orientation is perceived accurately, rapidly, and automatically from the face and its features. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1245‒1251. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Ishii, K., Ambady, N., Rosen, K. S., & Hallett, K. C. (2011). Found in translation: Cross-cultural consensus in the accurate categorization of male sexual orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1449‒1507. doi:10.1177/0146167211415630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Rosen, K. S., Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2011). Mating interest improves women’s accuracy in judging male sexual orientation. Psychological Science, 22, 881‒886. doi:10.1177/0956797611412394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Tskhay, K. O., Brambilla, M., Riva, P., Andrzejewski, S. A., & Krendl, A. C. (2015). The relationship between anti-gay prejudice and the categorization of sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 74–80. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skorska, M. N., Geniole, S. N., Vrysen, B. M., McCormick, C. M., & Bogaert, A. F. (2015). Facial structure predicts sexual orientation in both men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1377–1394. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0454-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, C., West, T. V., Jost, J. T., & Rule, N. O. (2013). The politics of gaydar: Ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 520‒541. doi:10.1037/a0031187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, C., West, T. V., Jost, J. T., & Rule, N. O. (2014). “Ditto heads”: Do conservatives perceive greater consensus within their ranks than liberals? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1162–1177. doi:10.1177/0146167214537834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulpizio, S., Fasoli, F., Maass, A., Paladino, M. P., Vespignani, F., Eyssel, F., & Bentler, D. (2015). The sound of voice: Voice-based categorization of speakers’ sexual orientation within and across languages. PLoS ONE, 10, e0128882. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak, J. A., & Zayas, V. (2012). The roles of featural and configural face processing in snap judgments of sexual orientation. PloS ONE, 7, e36671. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tskhay, K. O., Feriozzo, M. M., & Rule, N. O. (2013). Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation. Perception, 42, 1090–1094. doi:10.1068/p7575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2013). Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 72‒86. doi:10.1177/1088868312461308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2015a). Emotions facilitate the communication of ambiguous group memberships. Emotion, 15, 812–826. doi:10.1037/emo0000077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2015b). Sexual orientation across culture and time. In S. Safdar & N. Kosakowska-Berzecka (Eds.), The psychology of gender and culture (pp. 55–73). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Valentova, J. V., & Havlíček, J. (2013). Perceived sexual orientation based on vocal and facial stimuli is linked to self-rated sexual orientation in Czech men. PLoS ONE, 8, e82417. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Havlíček, J., & Neustupa, J. (2014). Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 353–361. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0194-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar