Independent, Autonomous, and Permissive: Examining the Links Between Self-Construal and Sexual Permissiveness

References

• Ahrold, T. K., & Meston, C. M. (2010). Ethnic differences in sexual attitudes of U.S. college students: Gender acculturation, and religiosity factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 190–202. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9406-1
   Google Scholar
• Ali, F., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The dark side of love and life satisfaction: Associations with intimate relationships, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 228–233. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, W. C., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1987). Relation of sex and gender role to love, sexual attitudes, and self-esteem. Sex Roles, 16, 637–648. doi:10.1007/BF00300378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckes, L., & Coan, J. A. (2011). Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 976–988. doi:10.1111/spco.2011.5.issue-12
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00023992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self- construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142–179. doi:10.1177/1088868310373752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Psychological individualism and romantic love. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 53–69. doi:10.1111/josi.1993.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, K. E., & Goetz, A. T. (2010). Mating strategies along narrowing definitions of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4, 128–141. doi:10.1037/h0099294
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321–326. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, J. S., Cross, S. E., & Morris, M. L. (2006). Let’s be friends: Relational self- construal and the development of intimacy. Personal Relationships, 13, 83–102. doi:10.1111/pere.2006.13.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamamura, T. (2012). Are cultures becoming more individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 3–24. doi:10.1177/1088868311411587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29. doi:10.1038/466029a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Klerman, G. L., Gough, H. G., Barrett, J., Korchin, S. J., & Chodoff, P. (1977). A measure of interpersonal dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 610–618. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4106_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kalin, R., & Tilby, P. J. (1978). Development and validation of a sex-role ideology scale. Psychological Reports, 42, 731–738. doi:10.2466/pr0.1978.42.3.731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., & Cokley, K. O. (2008). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism-collectivism: A comparison of African Americans and European Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 336–343. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.14.4.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippa, R. A. (2010). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 619–636. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9380-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. C. (2008). Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 143–168. doi:10.1177/0265407507086810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, J. K., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 77–98. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679848
   Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy, N., Kulkarni, S. P., Gupta, A., & Flood, P. C. (2007). Individualism- collectivism orientation and employee attitudes: A comparison of employees from the high-technology sector in India and Ireland. Journal of International Management, 13, 187–203. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, T., & McCann, D. (1998). Individual differences in relatedness and individuality: An exploration of two constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 847–859. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00020-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 212–221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. (2005a). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. (2005b). Is short-term mating the maladaptive result of insecure attachment? A test of competing evolutionary perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 747–768. doi:10.1177/0146167204271843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., ... Zupanèiè, A. (2003). Are men universally more dismissing than women? gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions. Personal Relationships, 10, 307–331. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P., & Fuller, R. C. (2015). On the varieties of sexual experience: Cross-cultural links between religiosity and human mating strategies. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(4), 314–326. doi:10.1037/rel0000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P., & Jonason, P. K. (2015). Attachment and sexual permissiveness: Exploring differential associations across sexes, cultures, and facets of short-term mating. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 119–133. doi:10.1177/0022022114551052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Big Five traits related to short-term mating: From personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 246–282. doi:10.1177/147470490800600204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. P. (2015). The evolution of culturally-variable sex differences: Men and women are not always different, but when they are…it appears not to result from patriarchy or sex role socialization. In V. A. Weekes-Shackelford & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The evolution of sexuality (pp. 221–256). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008, June). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P., Abrams, D., Abraham, C., & Spears, R. (1993). Religiosity and adolescents’ premarital sexual attitudes and behaviour: An empirical study of conceptual issues. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 39–52. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51. doi:10.1111/jopy.1992.60.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275. doi:10.1177/106939719502900302
   Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., McKinney, K., Walsh, R., & Anderson, C. (1988). A revision of the Reiss premarital sexual permissiveness scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 821–828. doi:10.2307/352650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., Treger, S., & Sakaluk, J. K. (2013). Premarital sexual standards and sociosexuality: Gender, ethnicity, and cohort differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1395–1405. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0145-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treger, S., & Sprecher, S. (2011). The influences of sociosexuality and attachment style on reactions to emotional versus sexual infidelity. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 413–422. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.516845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-Cultural Research, 3-4, 155–180. doi:10.1177/106939719302700301
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907–924. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.696169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2004). Self-construal and cooperation: Is the interdependent self more cooperative than the independent self? Self and Identity, 3, 177–190. doi:10.1080/13576500444000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., de Bouter, C., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1093–1102. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 279–292. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012). Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow: Nations’ gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences. Psychological Science, 23, 1176–1185. doi:10.1177/0956797612441004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar