393
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Partner Attractiveness and Perceived Sexually Transmitted Infection Risk Among Sexual Minority Men

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Agocha, V. B., & Cooper, M. L. (1999). Risk perceptions and safer-sex intentions: Does a partner’s physical attractiveness undermine the use of risk-relevant information? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 746–759. doi:10.1177/0146167299025006009.
  • Anderson, J. R., Holland, E., Koc, Y., & Haslam, N. (2018). Iobjectify: Self- and other-objectification on Grindr, a geosocial networking application designed for men who have sex with men. European Journal of Social Psychology. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2350.
  • Andrew, B. J., Mullan, B. A., de Wit, J. B. F., Monds, L. A., Todd, J., & Kothe, E. J. (2016). Does the theory of planned behaviour explain condom use behaviour among men who have sex with men? A meta-analytic review of the literature. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 2834–2844. doi:10.1007/s10461-016-1314-0.
  • Bancroft, J. (2000). Individual differences in sexual risk taking. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), The role of theory in sex research (pp. 177–212). Bloomington, IN, US: Indiana University Press.
  • Blanton, H., & Gerrard, M. (1997). Effect of sexual motivation on men’s risk perception for sexually transmitted disease: There must be 50 ways to justify a lover. Health Psychology, 16, 374–379. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.16.4.374.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2015). HIV among gay and bisexual men. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html.
  • Czarny, H. N., & Broaddus, M. R. (2017). Acceptability of HIV prevention information delivered through established geosocial networking mobile applications to men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 21, 3122–3128. doi:10.1007/s10461-017-1743-4.
  • Dijkstra, P., Buunk, B., & Blanton, H. (2000). The effect of target’s physical attractiveness and dominance on STD-risk perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1738–1755. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02465.x.
  • Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290. doi:10.1037/h0033731.
  • Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109.
  • Eleftheriou, A., Bullock, S., Graham, C. A., Stone, N., & Ingham, R. (2016). Does attractiveness influence condom use intentions in heterosexual men? An experimental study. BMJ Open, 6, 1–10. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010883.
  • Epstein, J., Klinkenberg, W. D., Scandell, D. J., Faulkner, K., & Claus, R. E. (2007). Perceived physical attractiveness, sexual history, and sexual intentions: An internet study. Sex Roles, 56, 23–31. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9169-x.
  • Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
  • Gold, R. S. (2000). AIDS education for gay men: Towards a more cognitive approach. AIDS Care, 12, 267–272. doi:10.1080/09540120050042972.
  • Gold, R. S., & Skinner, M. J. (1992). Situational factors and thought processes associated with unprotected intercourse in young gay men. Aids, 6, 1021–1030. doi:10.1097/00002030-199209000-00017.
  • Gold, R. S., & Skinner, M. J. (1996). Judging a book by its cover: Gay men’s use of perceptible characteristics to infer antibody status. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 7, 39–43. doi:10.1258/0956462961917032.
  • Green, S. M., Turner, D., Baldwin, J. A., Walsh-Buhi, E. R., Vamos, C. A., Dagne, G., & Marhefka, S. L. (2018). Towards an information motivation and behavioral skills model for new sex partners: Results of a study of condom use as an HIV prevention method for emerging adults who met partners on dating and sex-seeking platforms or offline. AIDS and Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10461-018-2349-1.
  • Grimm, J., & Schwartz, J. (2018). ‘It’s like birth control for HIV’: Communication and stigma for gay men on PrEP. Journal of Homosexuality. doi:10.1080/00918369.2018.1495978.
  • Kruse, M. I., & Fromme, K. (2005). Influence of physical attractiveness and alcohol on men’s perceptions of potential sexual partners and sexual behavior intentions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 13, 146–156. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.13.2.146.
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
  • Lennon, C. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2013). The role of men’s physical attractiveness in women’s perceptions of sexual risk: Danger or allure? Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 1166–1176. doi:10.1177/1359105312462438.
  • Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2008). The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. Psychological Methods, 13, 203–229. doi:10.1037/a0012869.
  • Misovich, S. J., Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1997). Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: Evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Review of General Psychology, 1, 72–107. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.72.
  • Montaño, M. A., Dombrowski, J. C., Dasgupta, S., Golden, M. R., Duerr, A., Manhart, L. E., … Khosropour, C. M. (2018). Changes in sexual behavior and STI diagnoses among MSM initiating PrEP in a clinic setting. AIDS and Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10461-018-2252-9.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (Seventh ed). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 77–98. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679848.
  • Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 161–182. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.557329.
  • Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233. doi:10.1037/a0020141.
  • Reisen, C. A., & Poppen, P. J. (1999). Partner-specific risk perception: A new conceptualization of perceived vulnerability to STDs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 667–684. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02018.x.
  • Renner, B., Schmälzle, R., & Schupp, H. T. (2012). First impressions of HIV risk: It takes only milliseconds to scan a stranger. PloS one, 7, 1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030460.
  • Sawyer, A. N., Smith, E. R., & Benotsch, E. G. (2018). Dating application use and sexual risk behavior among young adults. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: A Journal of the NSRC, 15, 183–191. doi:10.1007/s13178-017-0297-6.
  • Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008, June). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org/.
  • Sheeran, P., Harris, P. R., & Epton, T. (2014). Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 511–543. doi:10.1037/a0033065.
  • Shuper, P. A., & Fisher, W. A. (2008). The role of sexual arousal and sexual partner characteristics in HIV+ MSM’s intentions to engage in unprotected sexual intercourse. Health Psychology, 27, 445–454. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.4.445.
  • Smith, D. K., Herbst, J. H., Zhang, X., & Rose, C. E. (2015). Condom effectiveness for HIV prevention by consistency of use among men who have sex with men in the United States. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 68, 337–344. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000461.
  • Snijders, B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Strong, D. A., Bancroft, J., Carnes, L. A., Davis, L. A., & Kennedy, J. (2005). The impact of sexual arousal on sexual risk-taking: A qualitative study. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 185–191. doi:10.1080/00224490509552273.
  • Williams, S. S., Kimble, D. L., Covell, N. H., Weiss, L. H., Newton, K. J., Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). College students use implicit personality theory instead of safer sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 921–933. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00934.x.
  • Wongsomboon, V., & Robles, E. (2017). Devaluation of safe sex by delay or uncertainty: A within-subjects study of mechanisms underlying sexual risk behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 2131–2144. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0788-1.
  • Woolf-King, S. E., Maisto, S., Carey, M., & Vanable, P. (2010). Selection of film clips and development of a video for the investigation of sexual decision making among men who have sex with men. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 589–597. doi:10.1080/00224490903216748.
  • Wray, T. B., Kahler, C. W., & Monti, P. M. (2016). Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to study sex events among very high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS and Behavior, 20, 2231–2242. doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1272-y.
  • Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 695–719. doi:10.1177/1094428108327450.
  • Zou, H., & Fan, S. (2016). Characteristics of men who have sex with men who use smartphone geosocial networking applications and implications for HIV interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0709-3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.