Sexual Consent Communication among Sexual and Gender Minority College Students

References

• American College Health Association. (2019). American College Health Association - National College Health Assessment II: Undergraduate Student Reference Group, Executive Summary, Spring 2019. American College Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Eliseo-Arras, R. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. (2007). Spontaneous sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature. Feminism Psychology, 17(1), 93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. (2010). Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual communication between casual sex partners. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050903075226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. (2014). Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(5), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:aseb.0000037428.41757.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H., & Ryan, G. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Berntson, M. A., Hoffman, K. L., & Luff, T. L. (2014). College as context: Influences on interpersonal sexual scripts. Sexuality & Culture, 18(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9180-7
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. (1994). Cultural domain analysis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4(1994). 261–278. http://qualquant.org/wp-content/uploads/cda/Borgatti%201994%20Cultural%20Domain%20Analysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. (1996). ANTHROPAC 4.0. Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62(9–10), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. (2008). Gender-role implications on same-sex intimate partner Abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 23(6), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-008-9172-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, C., Lauve-Moon, K., & Buttell, F. (2015). Re-theorizing intimate partner violence through post-structural feminism, queer theory, and the sociology of gender. Social Sciences, 4(3), 668–687.
   Google Scholar
• Carballo-Diéguez, A., Remien, R. H., Dolezal, C., & Wagner, G. (1997). Unsafe sex in the primary relationships of Puerto Rican men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 1(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026257620055
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, N. E., Krishnakumar, A., & Leone, J. M. (2015). Reexamining issues of conceptualization and willing consent: The hidden role of coercion in experiences of sexual acquiescence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(11), 1828–1846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514549050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden, M. C., Ehman, A. C., Lair, E. C., & Gross, A. M. (2019). Sexual compliance: Examining the relationships among sexual want, sexual consent, and sexual assertiveness. Sexuality & Culture, 23(1), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9551-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L., Zakaras, J. M., Campbell, C., Wilson, P., Grisham, K., Chakravarty, D., & Hoff, C. (2017). Relationship power among same-sex male couples in New York and San Francisco: Laying the groundwork for sexual risk reduction interventions focused on interpersonal power. Journal of Sex Research, 54(7), 923–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1279258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. M., Sylaska, K. M., & Neal, A. M. (2015). Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: A critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychology of Violence, 5(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., & Stine, E. R. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506295354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. (1998). Consent for sexual behavior in a college student population. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 1. http://www.ejhs.org/volume1/consent1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Harry, J. (1982). Decision making and age differences among gay male couples. Journal of Homosexuality, 8(2), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v08n02_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harry, J., & DeVall, W. (1978). Age and sexual culture among homosexually oriented males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 7(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, S., & Muehlenhard, C. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. S., Khan, S. R., Wamboldt, A., & Mellins, C. A. (2019). Social dimensions of sexual consent among cisgender heterosexual college students: Insights from ethnographic research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(1), 26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 44(4), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701586706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hust, S. J., Rodgers, K. B., & Bayly, B. (2017). Scripting sexual consent: Internalized traditional sexual scripts and sexual consent expectancies among college students. Family Relations, 66(1), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N. (2013). The influence of consent on college students’ perceptions of the quality of sexual intercourse at last event. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(4), 260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Manning, J., & Hunt, M. (2018). Sexual consent in and out of the bedroom: Disjunctive views of heterosexual college students. Women’s Studies in Communication, 41(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1470121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Marcantonio, T. L., & Hunt, M. E. (2017). College students’ sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Sanders, S., Peterson, Z. D., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Consenting to sexual activity: The development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(3), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0225-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcantonio, T. L., Jozkowski, K. N., & Lo, W.-J. (2018). Beyond “Just Saying No”: A preliminary evaluation of strategies college students use to refuse sexual activity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(2), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1130-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcantonio, T. L., Jozkowski, K. N., & Wiersma-Mosley, J. (2018). The influence of partner status and sexual behavior on college women’s consent communication and feelings. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 44(8), 776–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2018.1474410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemoto, T., Operario, D., Soma, T., Bao, D., Vajrabukka, A., & Crisostomo, V. (2003). HIV risk and prevention among Asian/Pacific Islander men who have sex with men: Listen to our stories. AIDS Education and Prevention, 15(1S), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.15.1.5.7.23616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreffice, S. (2011). Sexual orientation and household decision making: Same-sex couples’ balance of power and labor supply choices. Labour Economics, 18(2), 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, M. (2005). Considerations for collecting freelists in the field: Examples from ethnobothany. Field Methods, 17(219), 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G., Nolan, J., & Yoder, S. (2000). Successive free listing: Using multiple free lists to generate explanatory models. Field Methods, 12(2), 83–107.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D., Fetterolf, J., & Rudman, L. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satinsky, S., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2014). Female sexual subjectivity and verbal consent to receiving oral sex. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2014.918065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. J., & Borgatti, S. P. (1998). Salience counts - and so does accuracy: Correcting and updating a measure for free-list-item salience. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(2), 208–209. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1997.7.2.208
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, E., & Van den Bulck, J. (2018). Casual sexual scripts on the screen: A quantitative content analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(5), 1481–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1147-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2015). Sexual script theory: Past, present, and future. In J. DeLamater & R. F. Plante (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of sexualitites (pp. 7–22). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Hunt, M., Wodika, A., Rhodes, D. L., Goodman, J., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Explicit verbal sexual consent communication: Effects of gender, relationship status, and type of sexual behavior. International Journal of Sexual Health, 31(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2019.1565793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Sexual precedent’s effect on sexual consent communication. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(6), 1723–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1348-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar