The Self-Reported Sexual Real-World Consequences of Sex Doll Use

References

• Altman, D. G. (1990). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, A. J., Wosnitzer, R., Scharrer, E., Sun, C., & Liberman, R. (2010). Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos: A content analysis update. Violence Against Women, 16(10), 1065–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210382866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cmp-lg/9602004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S., Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Brown, C. C. (2017). The porn gap: Differences in men’s and women’s pornography patterns in couple relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 16(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2016.1238796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, J. (2019). Regulating child sex robots: Restriction or experimentation? Medical Law Review, 27(4), 553–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwz002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, J., Earp, B. D., & Sandberg, A. (2017). Should we campaign against sex robots? In J. Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.), Robot sex: Social and ethical implications (1st ed., pp. 47–72). MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Desbuleux, J. C., & Fuss, J. (2023). Is the anthropomorphization of sex dolls associated with objectification and hostility toward women? A mixed method study among doll users. The Journal of Sex Research, 60(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2103071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewitte, M., & Reisman, Y. (2021). Clinical use and implications of sexual devices and sexually explicit media. Nature Reviews Urology, 18(6), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00456-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, N. (2017). Vom Internetsex zum Robotersex: Forschungsstand und Herausforderungen für die Sexualwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 30(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, N. (2020). Sexpuppen und Sexroboter aus psychologischer und therapeutischer Perspektive: Pathogene und salutogene Nutzungsmuster. In O. Bendel (Hrsg.), Maschinenliebe (pp. 283–301). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29864-7_16
   Google Scholar
• Döring, N., Mohseni, M. R., & Walter, R. (2020). Design, use, and effects of sex dolls and sex robots: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(7), e18551. https://doi.org/10.2196/18551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, N., & Poeschl, S. (2020). Experiences with diverse sex toys among German heterosexual adults: Findings from a national online survey. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(7), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1578329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L., Beckford, S. T., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2007). Sexual scripts of women: A longitudinal analysis of participants in a gender-specific HIV/STD prevention intervention. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9092-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eher, R., Rettenberger, M., & Schilling, F. (2010). Psychiatric diagnosis in sexual offenders: An empirical investigation of 807 imprisoned child molesters and rapists. Zeitschrift Für Sexualforschuung, 23(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1247274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2007). Exposure to pornography among youth in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 43(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783307073934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2009). The harms of pornography exposure among children and young people. Child Abuse Review. Special Issue: Special Issue on Gender and Child Harm, 18(6), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., & Kraus, S. W. (2021). Pornography use and psychological science: A call for consideration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420979594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., Kraus, S. W., Perry, S. L., Lewczuk, K., & Gola, M. (2020). Moral incongruence and compulsive sexual behavior: Results from cross-sectional interactions and parallel growth curve analyses. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129(3), 266–278. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/abn0000501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, K. R. (2022). The silicone self: Examining sexual selfhood and stigma within the love and sex doll community. Symbolic Interaction, 45(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, K. R., & Locatelli, C. C. (2022). From sex dolls to sex robots and beyond: A narrative review of theoretical and empirical research on human-like and personified sex tech. Current Sexual Health Reports, 14(3), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-022-00331-0
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C., & Lievesley, R. (2022). Exploring the ownership of child-like sex dolls. PsyArXiv. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(8), 4141–4156.https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zsufr
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., Lievesley, R., & Wanless, K. (2022). Exploring the psychological characteristics of individuals who own sex dolls. The Journal of Sex Research, 60(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2031848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsey, S. J. (2021). Following the script: Pornography’s associations with men’s sexual aggression through objectification and porn sex scripting [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz].
   Google Scholar
• Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Sanders, S., Dodge, B., Ghassemi, A., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2009). Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by women in the United States: Results from a nationally representative study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6(7), 1857–1866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01318.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, C., & Floyd, K. (2019). Affection substitution: The effect of pornography consumption on close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3887–3907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519841719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. ISO 690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Marcantonio, T. L., Rhoads, K. E., Canan, S., Hunt, M. E., & Willis, M. (2019). A content analysis of sexual consent and refusal communication in mainstream films. The Journal of Sex Research, 56(6), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1595503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaassen, M. J., & Peter, J. (2015). Gender (in) equality in internet pornography: A content analysis of popular pornographic internet videos. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(7), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.976781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, V., Šević, S., Kohut, T., & Štulhofer, A. (2022). Longitudinal assessment of the association between the use of sexually explicit material, hyperfemininity, and sexual agency in adolescent women. Psychology & Sexuality, 13(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1757500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohut, T., Balzarini, R. N., Fisher, W. A., & Campbell, L. (2018). Pornography’s associations with open sexual communication and relationship closeness vary as a function of dyadic patterns of pornography use within heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(4), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517743096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D. (2007). Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D.(2012). The ethics of robot prostitutes. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Intelligent robotics and autonomous agents. Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics (pp. 223–231). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, R. (2014, November). Sexbots: Replacements for sex workers? Ethical constraints on the design of sentient beings for utilitarian purposes [Conference presentation]. In ACE '14 Workshops: Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference (pp. 1–8). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2693787.2693789?casa_token=qffSh86y-UoAAAAA:3kaRelZUTFoC5N4AZrquldt-IUYOcpV1wC0fgH4LbZFkl7fjJQgo7-PBlmLF_R3xBKKgEvDPDVNSLQ.
   Google Scholar
• Malamuth, N. (2018). Adding fuel to the fire”? Does exposure to non-consenting adult or to child pornography increase risk of sexual aggression? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marečková, A., Androvičová, R., Bártová, K., Krejčová, L., & Klapilová, K. (2022). Men with paraphilic interests and their desire to interact with a sex robot. Journal of Future Robot Life, 3(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/FRL-210010
   Google Scholar
• Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, N., & Twist, M. L. (2017). The rise of digisexuality: Therapeutic challenges and possibilities. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 32(3–4), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2017.1397950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, B., & Shim, J. W. (2008). Gender, sexual affect, and motivations for Internet pornography use. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20(3), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317610802240154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaus, J. G., Quintana, G. R., Mac Cionnaith, C. E., Gerson, C. A., Dubé, S., & Coria-Avila, G. A. (2020). Conditioning of sexual interests and paraphilias in humans is difficult to see, virtually impossible to test, and probably exactly how it happens: A comment on Hsu and Bailey (2020). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(5), 1403–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01739-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queen, C. (2013). Sexual enhancement products. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(10), 3155–3156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12373
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. (2015). The asymmetrical ‘relationship’: Parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 290–293. https://doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874281
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. (2016). Sex robot matters: Slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 35(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2016.2554421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutkin, A. (2016). Could sex robots and virtual reality treat paedophilia? New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2099607-could-sex-robots-and-virtual-realitytreat-paedophilia
   Google Scholar
• Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., & Giaccardi, S. (2019). Less than human? Media use, objectification of women, and men’s acceptance of sexual aggression. Psychology of Violence, 9(5), 536. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spišák, S. (2020). The intimacy effect: Girls’ reflections about pornography and ‘actual sex.’ Sexualities, 23(7), 1248–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460720902719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
   Google Scholar
• Strikwerda, L. (2017). Legal and moral implications of child sex robots. In J. Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.), Robot sex: Social and ethical implications (1st ed., pp. 133–152). MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Štulhofer, A., Buško, V., & Landripet, I. (2010). Pornography, sexual socialization, and satisfaction among young men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(1), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9387-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, N. M., Lazar, A., Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2019). Of dolls and men: Anticipating sexual intimacy with robots. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26(3), e13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedin, C. G., Åkerman, I., & Priebe, G. (2011). Frequent users of pornography. A population based epidemiological study of Swedish male adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 34(4), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczuka, J. M., & Krämer, N. C. (2018). Jealousy 4.0? An empirical study on jealousy-related discomfort of women evoked by other women and gynoid robots. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 9(1), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2018-0023
   Google Scholar
• Tozdan, S., & Briken, P. (2019). Age of onset and its correlates in men with sexual interest in children. Sexual Medicine, 7(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2018.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tydén, T., & Rogala, C. (2004). Sexual behaviour among young men in Sweden and the impact of pornography. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 15(9), 590–593. https://doi.org/10.1258/0956462041724299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt-Morel, M.-P., Rosen, N. O., Willoughby, B. J., Leonhardt, N. D., & Bergeron, S. (2020). Pornography use and romantic relationships: A dyadic daily diary study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(10–11), 2802–2821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520940048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, S. (2012). The modern sex doll owner: A descriptive analysis [Master’s, California Polytechnic State University]. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/theses/84
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Bridges, A. J., & Sun, C. (2022). Pornography use, gender, and sexual objectification: A multinational study. Sexuality & Culture, 26(4), 1298–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09943-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby, B., Leonhardt, N., & Augustus, R. (2020). Untangling the porn web: Creating an organizing framework for pornography research among couples. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(6), 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1698003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoman, I., & Mars, M. (2012). Robots, men and sex tourism. Futures, 44(4), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zara, G., Veggi, S., & Farrington, D. P. (2022). Sexbots as synthetic companions: Comparing attitudes of official sex offenders and non-offenders. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(2), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00797-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., & Fischer, M. H. (2020). Intimate relationships with humanoid robots: Understanding human social cognition and human sexuality. In O. Bendel (Hrsg.), Maschinenliebe (pp. 237–254). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29864-7_14
   Google Scholar