Romantic Attachment and Sexual Desire: The Role of Desire Target

References

• Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. The American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2014). Separating the shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 739–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E. (2010). Bound to interact: The divergent goals and complex interplay of attachment and sex within romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E., Hirschberger, G., & Goldenberg, J. (2011). Desire in the face of death: Terror management, attachment, and sexual motivation. Personal Relationships, 18(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E., & Reis, H. T. (2012). When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7), 946–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212441028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E., & Reis, H. T. (2019). Evolved to be connected: The dynamics of attachment and sex over the course of romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mizrahi, M., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Sass, O., & Granovski-Milner, C. (2016). Intimately connected: The importance of partner responsiveness for experiencing sexual desire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E., Weisberg, Y. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2011). Desire under attack: Attachment orientations and the effects of relationship threat on sexual motivations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(4), 448–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510381932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenstock, S. M. (2022). Expectations and sexual desire in romantic relationships: An experimental investigation of pleasure and emotional closeness expectancies among young adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 59(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1991260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenstock, S. M., & DeLamater, J. (2019). Sexuality across the life course. In L. Spillman (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in sociology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0224
   Google Scholar
• Blumenstock, S. M., Quinn-Nilas, C., Milhausen, R. R., & McKay, A. (2020). High emotional and sexual satisfaction among partnered midlife Canadians: Associations with relationship characteristics, sexual activity and communication, and health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01498-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brassard, A., Shaver, P. R., & Lussier, Y. (2007). Attachment, sexual experience, and sexual pressure in romantic relationships: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 14(3), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report meassures of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brotto, L., Atallah, S., Johnson-Agbakwu, C., Rosenbaum, T., Abdo, C., Byers, E. S., Graham, C., Nobre, P., & Wylie, K. (2016). Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13(4), 538–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S., & Rehman, U. S. (2014). Sexual well-being. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology: Vol. 1. Person-based approaches (pp. 317–337). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, M., & Kucker, S. C. (2020). An MTurk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D. (2011). Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., & Klein, V. (2022). Women get worse sex: A confound in the explanation of gender differences in sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 960–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211041598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Valentine, B. A. (2011). Women, men, and the bedroom: Methodological and conceptual insights that narrow, reframe, and eliminate gender differences in sexuality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411418467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. M. (2006). The times we sizzle, and the times we sigh: The multiple erotics of arousal, anticipation, and release. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 16(6), 665–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481880701357321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., & Vernon, M. L. (2004). Attachment style and subjective motivations for sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1076–1090. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2014a). Gender-specificity of solitary and dyadic sexual desire among gynephilic and androphilic women and men. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(4), 980–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2014b). Gender differences and similarities in sexual desire. Current Sexual Health Reports, 6(4), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-014-0027-5
   Google Scholar
• Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210392789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWall, C. N., Lambert, N. M., Slotter, E. B., Pond, R. S., Deckman, T., Finkel, E. J., Luchies, L. B., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). So far away from one’s partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: Avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1302–1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewitte, M. (2012). Different perspectives on the sex-attachment link: Towards an emotion-motivational account. The Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.576351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynamo. (2017). Guidelines for academic requesters. WeAreDynamo Wiki. http://wiki.wearedynamo.org/index.php?title=Guidelines_for_Academic_Requesters
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (2004). Attachment and sexuality in close relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 183–201). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, D. A., St. John, H. K., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, D., Blair, K. L., & Phillips, M. (2010). Women’s sexual satisfaction as a predictor of well-being in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902898710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73
   Google Scholar
• Hull, T. H. (2008). Sexual pleasure and wellbeing. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20(1–2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317610802157234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Hein, S., Wang, K., Roberts, A., Cui, J., Smith, M., Bullock Mann, F., Barmer, A., & Dilig, R. (2020). The condition of education 2020 (NCES 2020–144; pp. 124–126). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/coe_cha.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impett, E. A., Muise, A., & Peragine, D. (2014). Sexuality in the context of relationships. In D. L. Tolman, L. M. Diamond, J. A. Bauermeister, W. H. George, J. G. Pfaus, & L. M. Ward (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 1: Person-based approaches (pp. 269–315). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14193-010
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, K. P., Herbenick, D., Fortenberry, D., Sanders, S., & Reece, M. (2014). The object of sexual desire: Examining the “What” in “What do you desire? The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(11), 2709–2719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, K. P., Toland, M. D., Rosenkrantz, D. E., Brown, H. M., & Hong, S. H. (2018). Validation of the Sexual Desire Inventory for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer adults. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000260
   Google Scholar
• Mark, K. P., Vowels, L. M., & Murray, S. H. (2018). The impact of attachment style on sexual satisfaction and sexual desire in a sexually diverse sample. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 44(5), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1405310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAnulty, R. D., & Brineman, J. M. (2007). Infidelity in dating relationships. Annual Review of Sex Research, 18, 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, S. I. (2011). Who is the “self” in self reports of sexual satisfaction? Research and policy implications. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8(4), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0067-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meana, M. (2010). Elucidating women’s (hetero)sexual desire: Definitional challenges and content expansion. The Journal of Sex Research, 47(2–3), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903402546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2013). The role of attachment security in adolescent and adult close relationships. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 66–89). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood, second edition: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, M., Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., & Birnbaum, G. E. (2019). When insecurity dampens desire: Attachment anxiety in men amplifies the decline in sexual desire during the early years of romantic relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1223–1236. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyano, N., Vallejo-Medina, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2017). Sexual Desire Inventory: Two or three dimensions? The Journal of Sex Research, 54(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1109581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimbi, F. M., Tripodi, F., Rossi, R., Navarro-Cremades, F., & Simonelli, C. (2020). Male sexual desire: An overview of biological, psychological, sexual, relational, and cultural factors influencing desire. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 8(1), 59–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Péloquin, K., Brassard, A., Lafontaine, M. F., & Shaver, P. R. (2014). Sexuality examined through the lens of attachment theory: Attachment, caregiving, and sexual satisfaction. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.757281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. http://www.quantpsy.org/rmsea/rmsea.htm
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The Sexual Desire Inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 22(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926239608414655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., Christopher, F. S., Regan, P., Orbuch, T., & Cate, R. M. (2018). Sexuality in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 311–326). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.025
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. A., & Clifford, S. (2017). Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo-Medina, P., Rojas-Paoli, I., & Álvarez-Muelas, A. (2020). Validation of the Sexual Desire Inventory in Colombia. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1739181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Anders, S. M., Herbenick, D., Brotto, L. A., Harris, E. A., & Chadwick, S. B. (2022). The heteronormativity theory of low sexual desire in women partnered with men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02100-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lankveld, J., Dewitte, M., Thewissen, V., Jacobs, N., & Verboon, P. (2021). Predicting sexual desire in daily life from an attachment perspective: An experience sampling study. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 47(4), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1871141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrangalova, Z., & Ong, A. D. (2014). Who benefits from casual sex? The moderating role of sociosexuality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(8), 883–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614537308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The experiences in close relationship scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. M., Koch, P. B., & Mansfield, P. K. (2006). Women’s sexual desire: A feminist critique. The Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J., & Young, K. M. (2019, July). Don’t get lost in the crowd: Best practices for using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk in behavioral research. Journal of the Midwest Association for Information Systems (JMWAIS), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.17705/3jmwa.000050
   Google Scholar