181
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Role of Attractiveness in Gendered Sexual Response Patterns

, ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Anderson, U. S., Perea, E. F., Vaughn Becker, D., Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (2010). I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 804–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.015
  • Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278641
  • Chiazze, L., Brayer, F. T., Macisco, J. J., Parker, M. P., & Duffy, B. J. (1968). The length and variability of the human menstrual cycle. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 203(6), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1968.03140060001001
  • Chivers, M. L. (2005). A brief review and discussion of sex differences in the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990500238802
  • Chivers, M. L. (2017). The specificity of women’s sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: A review and ten hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0897-x
  • Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biological Psychology, 70(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.12.002
  • Chivers, M. L., Bouchard, K. N., Timmers, A. D., & Hoffmann, H. (2015). Straight but not narrow; Within-gender variation in the gender-specificity of women’s sexual response. PLoS ONE, 10(12), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142575
  • Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15(11), 736–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00750.x
  • Chivers, M. L., Roy, C., Grimbos, T., Cantor, J. M., & Seto, M. C. (2014). Specificity of sexual arousal for sexual activities in men and women with conventional and masochistic sexual interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(5), 931–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0174-1
  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1108–1121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1108
  • Chivers, M. L., Suschinsky, K. D., Timmers, A. D., & Bossio, J. A. (2014). Experimental, neuroimaging, and psychophysiological methods in sexuality research. In APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 1: Person-based approaches (pp. 99–119). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14193-005
  • Chivers, M. L., & Timmers, A. D. (2012). Effects of gender and relationship context in audio narratives on genital and subjective sexual response in heterosexual women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9937-3
  • Cloutier, J., Heatherton, T. F., Whalen, P. J., & Kelley, W. M. (2008). Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(6), 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20062
  • Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2015, August 9–12). The influence of sexually-relevant cues on early and late attentional biases in women and men. In G. Rieger (Chair), Women’s specificity in sexual response: Moderations by measurement. 41st Annual Meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research.
  • Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2018). The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men. Royal Society Open Science, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172286
  • Dawson, S. J., Chivers, M. L., & Hoffmann, H. (2016). Gender-specificity of initial and controlled visual attention to sexual stimuli in androphilic women and gynephilic men. PLoS ONE, 11(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152785
  • Dawson, S. J., Fretz, K. M., & Chivers, M. L. (2017). Visual attention patterns of women with androphilic and gynephilic sexual attractions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0825-0
  • Dawson, S. J., Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Sexual fantasies and viewing times across the menstrual cycle: A diary study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9939-1
  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Watching the hourglass: Eye tracking reveals men’s appreciation of the female form. Human Nature, 21(4), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9100-6
  • Ebsworth, M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9923-9
  • Fink, B., Matts, P. J., Klingenberg, H., Kuntze, S., Weege, B., & Grammer, K. (2008). Visual attention to variation in female facial skin color distribution. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 7(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00382.x
  • Freund, K. (1963). A laboratory method for diagnosing predominance of homo- or hetero- erotic interest in the male. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(63)90012-3
  • Freund, K. (1967). Diagnosing homo- or heterosexuality and erotic age-preference by means of a psychophysiological test. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(67)90036-8
  • Freund, K., Watson, R., & Rienzo, D. (1989). Heterosexuality, homosexuality, and erotic age preference. The Journal of Sex Research, 26(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498909551494
  • Fromberger, P., Jordan, K., Von Herder, J., Steinkrauss, H., Nemetschek, R., Stolpmann, G., & Müller, J. L. (2012). Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: Preliminary evidence from eye movement measures. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(4), 919–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9816-3
  • Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partners’ mate-retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269(1494), 975–982. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1952
  • Guermandi, E., Vegetti, W., Bianchi, M. M., Uglietti, A., Ragni, G., & Crosignani, P. (2001). Reliability of ovulation tests in infertile women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 97(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01083-8
  • Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2016). Sex-specificity in the reward value of facial attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 871–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0509-1
  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Earls, C. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4(4), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.4.502
  • Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006
  • Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Nordsiek, U., Luzar, C., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2010). Viewing time effects revisited: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets under restricted task conditions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(6), 1275–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9595-2
  • Ishai, A. (2007). Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.010
  • Israel, E., & Strassberg, D. S. (2009). Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(4), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9246-4
  • Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. The Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552016
  • Katz, M. A., Penniston, T. L., Barry, C., Micanovic, N., Seto, M. C., & Chivers, M. L. (2023). Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: Expert opinion and recommendations. Sexual Medicine, 11(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfad012
  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Indiana University Press.
  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Saunders.
  • Laan, E., Everaerd, W., & Evers, A. (1995). Assessment of female sexual arousal: Response specificity and construct validity. Psychophysiology, 32(5), 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb02099.x
  • Levy, B., Ariely, D., Mazar, N., Chi, W., Lukas, S., & Elman, I. (2008). Gender differences in the motivational processing of facial beauty. Learning and Motivation, 39(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2007.09.002
  • Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468
  • Lippa, R. A. (2012). Effects of sex and sexual orientation on self-reported attraction and viewing times to images of men and women: Testing for category specificity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9898-y
  • Lippa, R. A., Patterson, T. M., & Marelich, W. D. (2010). Looking at and longing for male and female “swimsuit models”: Men are much more category specific than women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(3), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609359814
  • Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Strauss, G. P. (2008). Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9208-x
  • Maner, J. K., Dewall, C. N., & Gailliot, M. T. (2008). Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311910
  • Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & DeWall, C. N. (2007). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.006
  • Meston, C. M., & Frohlich, P. F. (2000). The neurobiology of sexual function. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57(11), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.57.11.1012
  • Micanovic, N., Timmers, A. D., & Chivers, M. L. (2021). Gender-specific genital and subjective sexual arousal to prepotent sexual stimuli in androphilic men and gynephilic women. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 30(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2021-0004
  • Nummenmaa, L., Hietanen, J. K., Santtila, P., & Hyönä, J. (2012). Gender and visibility of sexual cues influence eye movements while viewing faces and bodies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(6), 1439–1451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9911-0
  • O’Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perrett, D., Burt, D. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00145-8
  • Peterson, Z. D., Janssen, E., & Laan, E. (2010). Women’s sexual responses to heterosexual and lesbian erotica: The role of stimulus intensity, affective reaction, and sexual history. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(4), 880–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9546-y
  • Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.10.002
  • Ponseti, J., Bosinski, H. A., Wolff, S., Peller, M., Jansen, O., Mehdorn, H. M., Büchel, C., & Siebner, H. R. (2006). A functional endophenotype for sexual orientation in humans. NeuroImage, 33(3), 825–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.002
  • Rupp, H. A., & Wallen, K. (2007). Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: An eye-tracking study in men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51(4), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.008
  • Singer, B. (1984). Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction. The Journal of Sex Research, 20(3), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498409551222
  • Spape, J., Timmers, A. D., Yoon, S., Ponseti, J., & Chivers, M. L. (2014). Gender-specific genital and subjective sexual arousal to prepotent sexual features in heterosexual women and men. Biological Psychology, 102(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.008
  • Sui, J., & Liu, C. H. (2009). Can beauty be ignored? Effects of facial attractiveness on covert attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(2), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.276
  • Suschinsky, K. D., Elias, L. J., & Krupp, D. B. (2007). Looking for Ms. Right: Allocating attention to facilitate mate choice decisions. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(2), 147470490700500. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490700500214
  • Suschinsky, K. D., Lalumière, M. L., & Chivers, M. L. (2009). Sex differences in patterns of genital sexual arousal: Measurement artifacts or true phenomena? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(4), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9339-8
  • Timmers, A. D., & Chivers, M. L. (2012). Sociosexuality and sexual arousal. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 21(3–4), 135–146.
  • Timmers, A. D., Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2018). The effects of gender and relationship context cues on responsive sexual desire in exclusively and predominantly androphilic women and gynephilic men. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(9), 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1456509
  • Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 46(2–3), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902747768
  • Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., & Baird, D. D. (1996). Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 51(6), 357–358. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199606000-00016
  • Woloszyn, M. R., Clyde, K., & Corno, D. (2020). The relative impact of looks, income, warmth, and intelligence on female online dating preferences. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100089

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.