The Sexual Double Standard and Adolescent Stigma: A Sociometric and Comparative Approach

References

• Agan, M. L. F., Costin, A. S., Deutz, M. H. F., Edelsbrunner, P. A., Záliš, L., & Franken, A. (2015). Associations between risk behaviour and social status in European adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.975790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, F. C., Marsh, P., & McElhaney, K. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents’ success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76(3), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00875.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvarez-Muelas, A., Carmen Gómez-Berrocal, C., Osorio, D., Hugo, M., Noe-Grijalva, H. M., & Sierra, J. C. (2022). Sexual double standard: A cross-cultural comparison of young adults Spanish, Peruvian, and Ecuadorian people. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 20(2), 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00714-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierman, K. L. (2004). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordini, G. S., & Sperb, T. M. (2013). Sexual double standard: A review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality & Culture, 17(4), 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9163-0
   Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H. (2019). Sociometric status types. The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad271
   Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., & Moors, A. C. (2012). Backlash from the bedroom: Stigma mediates gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312467169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerink, P. M., Vanwesenbeeck, I., van den Eijnden, R. J., & Ter Bogt, T. F. (2016). Psychosexual correlates of sexual double standard endorsement in adolescent sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1030720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endendijk, J. J., Deković, M., Vossen, H., van Baar, A. L., & Reitz, E. (2022). Sexual double standards: Contributions of sexual socialization by parents, peers, and the media. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(3), 1721–1740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02088-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endendijk, J. J., van Baar, A. L., & Decović, M. (2020). He is a stud, she is a slut! A meta-analysis on the continued existence of sexual double standards. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868319891310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farvid, P., Braun, V., & Rowney, C. (2017). ‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: Women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(5), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felmlee, D., Rodis, P. I., & Zhang, A. (2020). Sexist slurs: Reinforcing feminine stereotypes online. Sex Roles, 83(1–2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01095-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, H., & Kitzinger, C. (2001). Reformulating sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory & Psychology, 11(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301112004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, W., & Rose, A. J. (2015). Friendships, romantic relationships, and peer relationships. In Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1–43). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy322
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, H. (2019). Acquiescing to the script: A panel study of college students’ sexual media habits, endorsement of heteronormative scripts, and their hesitance toward resisting unwanted hookups. Sex Roles, 80(11–12), 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0971-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Hensums, M., Overbeek, G., & Jorgensen, T. D. (2022). Not one sexual double standard but two? Adolescents’ attitudes about appropriate sexual behavior. Youth & Society, 54(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X20957924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, G., & Kearl, H. (2011). Crossing the line: Sexual harassment at school. American Association of University Women.
   Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Marks, M. J. (2009). Common vs. uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 60(5–6), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9542-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreager, D. A., Staff, J., Gauthier, R., Lefkowitz, E. S., & Feinberg, M. E. (2016). The double standard at sexual debut: Gender, sexual behavior and adolescent peer acceptance. Sex Roles, 75(7), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0618-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krems, J. A., Ko, A., Moon, J. W., & Varnum, M. E. (2021). Lay beliefs about gender and sexual behavior: First evidence for a pervasive, robust (but seemingly unfounded) stereotype. Psychological Science, 32(6), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620983829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• la Roi, C., Dijkstra, J. K., Kretschmer, T., Savickaitė, R., & Veenstra, R. (2020). Peers and homophobic attitudes in adolescence: Examining selection and influence processes in friendships and antipathies. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2229–2245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01298-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, H., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Identity, peer relationships, and adolescent girls’ sexual behavior: An exploration of the contemporary double standard. The Journal of Sex Research, 48(5), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2010.506679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markle, G. (2008). “Can women have sex like a man?”: Sexual scripts in sex and the city. Sexuality & Culture, 12(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-007-9019-1
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J. (2008). Evaluations of sexually active men and women under divided attention: A social cognitive approach to the sexual double standard. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701866664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J., & Fraley, C. F. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J., Young, T. M., & Zaikman, Y. (2018). The sexual double standard in the real world. Social Psychology, 50(2), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, C., Craig, B., La Roi, C., & Veenstra, R. (2023). Adolescent friendship, cross-sexuality ties, and attitudes towards sexual minorities: A social network perspective of intergroup contact. Social Science Research, 114, 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, C., Kreager, D. A., & Veenstra, R. (2022). Keeping to the code: How local norms of friendship and dating inform macro-structures of adolescents’ romantic networks. Social Networks, 70, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (2002). Reconceptualizing the sexual double standard. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 13(2), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v13n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive?: A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. H. (2018). Heterosexual men’s sexual desire: Supported by, or deviating from, traditional masculinity norms and sexual scripts? Sex Roles, 78(1–2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0766-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. C., Crockett, L., Richards, M., & Boxer, A. (1988). A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinstein, M. J., Choukas-Bradley, S. C., Helms, S. W., Brechwald, W. A., & Rancourt, D. (2011). High peer popularity longitudinally predicts adolescent health risk behavior, or does it?: An examination of linear and quadratic associations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(9), 980–990. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsr053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinstein, M. J., Meade, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Adolescent oral sex, peer popularity, and perceptions of best friends’ sexual behavior. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsg012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn-Nilas, C., & Kennett, D. J. (2018). Reasons why undergraduate women comply with unwanted, non-coercive sexual advances: A serial indirect effect model integrating sexual script theory and sexual self-control perspectives. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(5), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1427039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, I. L. (1960). Premarital sexual standards in America. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, I. L. (1964). The scaling of premarital sexual permissiveness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/349726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18(4), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryjova, Y., Kelleghan, A., Badaly, D., Duong, M., & Schwartz, D. (2021). The relationship between dating status and academic and social functioning in middle adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(6), 1268–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01395-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Fuentes, M. D. M., Moyano, N., Gómez-Berrocal, C., & Sierra, J. C. (2020). Invariance of the Sexual Double Standard Scale: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalet, A. T. (2011). Not under my roof: Parents, teens, and the culture of sex. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention—behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003
   Google Scholar
• Shen, A. C. T., Chiu, M. Y., & Gao, J. (2012). Predictors of dating violence among Chinese adolescents: The role of gender-role beliefs and justification of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1066–1089. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511424497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra, J. C., Gutierrez-Quintanilla, R., Bermudez, M. P., & Buela-Casal, G. (2009). Male sexual coercion: Analysis of a few associated factors. Psychological Reports, 105(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.1.69-79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26(4), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000005053.99846.e5
   Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., & Hatfield, E. (1996). Premarital sexual standards among U.S. college students: Comparison with Russian and Japanese students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25(3), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk sexuality. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2019). Gender inequality report. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, Y. H., Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2020). Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research. Journal of Adolescence, 84(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wesche, R., Kreager, D. A., Feinberg, M. E., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2019). Peer acceptance and sexual behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(5), 996–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-00991-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, E. (2002). Fast girls: Teenage tribes and the myth of the slut. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2015). Sexual script theory: Past, present, and future. In J. DeLamater & R. Plante (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of sexualities (pp. 7–22). Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17341-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaikman, Y., & Marks, M. J. (2017). Promoting theory-based perspectives in sexual double standard research. Sex Roles, 76(7–8), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0677-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar