Preferred level of sexual experience in a date or mate: The merger of two methodologies

References

• Bartholomew , K. and Horowitz , L. M. 1991 . Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four‐category model . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 61 : 226 – 244 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettor , L. , Hendrick , S. S. and Hendrick , C. 1995 . Gender and sexual standards in dating relationships . Personal Relationships , 2 : 359 – 369 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm , S. S. 1992 . Intimate relationships , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Buss , D. M. 1989 . Sex differences in human mate‐preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures . Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 12 : 1 – 49 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss , D. M. and Barnes , M. 1986 . Preferences in human mate‐selection . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 50 : 559 – 570 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss , D. M. and Schmitt , D. P. 1993 . Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating . Psychological Review , 100 : 204 – 232 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupach , W. R. and Metts , S. 1995 . The role of sexual attitude similarity in romantic heterosexual relationships . Personal Relationships , 2 : 287 – 300 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLamater , J. 1989 . “ The social control of human sexuality ” . In Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context , Edited by: McKinney , K. and Sprecher , S. 30 – 62 . Norwood, NJ : Ablex .
   Google Scholar
• DeSrochers , S. 1995 . What types of men are most attractive and most repulsive to women? . Sex Roles , 32 : 375 – 391 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feingold , A. 1990 . Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 59 : 981 – 993 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon , J. H. and Simon , W. 1973 . Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality , Chicago : Aldine .
   Google Scholar
• Gangestad , S. W. and Simpson , J. A. 1990 . Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation . Journal of Personality , 58 : 69 – 96 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick , S. S. and Hendrick , C. 1987 . Multi‐dimensionality of sexual attitudes . The Journal of Sex Research , 23 : 502 – 526 .
   Google Scholar
• Hill , R. 1945 . Campus values in mate‐selection . Journal of Home Economics , 37 : 554 – 558 .
   Google Scholar
• Howard , J. A. , Blumstein , P. and Schwartz , P. 1987 . Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate‐selection . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53 : 194 – 200 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt , L. L. and Hudson , J. W. 1981 . Personal characteristics important in mate preference among college students . Social Behavior and Personality , 9 : 93 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson , J. W. and Henze , L. P. 1969 . Campus values in mate selection: A replication . Journal of Marriage and the Family , 31 : 772 – 778 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Istvan , J. and Griffitt , W. 1980 . Effects of sexual experience on dating desirability and marriage desirability: An experimental study . Journal of Marriage and the Family , 42 : 377 – 385 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby , A. P. and Williams , J. D. 1985 . Effects of premarital sexual standards and behavior on dating and marriage desirability . Journal of Marriage and the Family , 47 : 1059 – 1065 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick , D. T. , Sadalla , E. K. , Groth , G. and Trost , M. R. 1990 . Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model . Journal of Personality , 58 : 97 – 116 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick , D. T. and Trost , M. R. 1989 . “ A reproductive exchange model of heterosexual relationships: Putting proximate economics in ultimate perspective ” . In Close relationships , Edited by: Hendrick , C. 92 – 118 . Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Laumann , E. , Michael , R. , Gagnon , J. and Michaels , S. 1994 . The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States , Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mischel , W. 1966 . “ A social‐learning view of sex differences in behavior ” . In The development of sex differences , Edited by: Maccoby , E. E. 56 – 81 . Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Oliver , M. B. and Hyde , J. S. 1993 . Gender differences in sexuality: A meta‐analysis . Psychological Bulletin , 114 : 29 – 51 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver , M. B. and Sedikides , C. 1992 . Effects of sexual permissiveness on desirability of partner as a function of low and high commitment to relationship . Social Psychology Quarterly , 55 : 321 – 333 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan , L. F. 1995 . Less is more: The effects of sexual experience on judgments of men's and women's personality characteristics and relationship desirability . Sex Roles , 33 : 159 – 181 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan , P. C. and Berscheid , E. 1997 . Gender differences in characteristics desired in a potential sexual and marriage partner . Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality , 9 : 25 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Reiss , I. L. 1981 . Some observations on ideology and sexuality in America . Journal of Marriage and the Family , 43 : 271 – 283 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson , J. A. and Gangestad , S. W. 1991a . Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 60 : 870 – 883 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson , J. A. and Gangestad , S. W. 1991b . “ Personality and sexuality: Empirical relations and an integrative theoretical model ” . In Sexuality in close relationships , Edited by: McKinney , K. and Sprecher , S. 71 – 92 . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Simpson , J. A. and Gangestad , S. W. 1992 . Sociosexuality and romantic choice . Journal of Personality , 60 : 31 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith , E. R. , Becker , M. A. , Byrne , D. and Przybyla , D. P. J. 1993 . Sexual attitudes of males and females as predictors of interpersonal attraction and marital compatibility . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 23 : 1011 – 1034 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher , S. 1989 . The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction . Sex Roles , 21 : 591 – 607 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher , S. , McKinney , K. and Orbuch , T. L. 1991 . The effect of current sexual behavior on friendship, dating, and marriage desirability . The Journal of Sex Research , 28 : 387 – 408 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher , S. and Regan , P. C. 1996 . College virgins: How men and women perceive their sexual status . The Journal of Sex Research , 33 : 3 – 15 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher , S. , Sullivan , Q. and Hatfield , E. 1994 . Mate‐selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 66 : 1074 – 1080 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons , D. 1979 . The evolution of human sexuality , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Townsend , J. M. and Levy , G. D. 1990 . Effects of potential partners’ physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection . Archives of Sexual Behavior , 19 : 149 – 164 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman , M. W. and Allgeier , E. R. 1992 . Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation? . Ethology and Sociobiology , 13 : 115 – 124 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , J. D. and Jacoby , A. P. 1989 . The effects of premarital heterosexual and homosexual experience on dating and marriage desirability . Journal of Marriage and Family , 51 : 489 – 497 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar