The Prototype of Indicators of a Responsive Partner Shapes Information Processing: A False Recognition Study

REFERENCES

• Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London, UK: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38–48. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidov, M., & Grusec, J. E. (2006). Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes. Child Development, 77, 44–58. doi:10.1111/cdev.2006.77.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., Perie, M., & Story, A. L. (1991). Self-serving prototypes of social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 957–968. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557–579. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, B. (2004). The role of prototypes in interpersonal cognition. In M. W. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition ( pp. 180–205). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. J., Fincham, F. D., Cramer, L., & Heron, N. (1987). The role of attributions in the development of dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 481–489. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, K., Grossman, K. E., Spangler, G., Suess, G., & Unzner, L. (1985). Maternal sensitivity and newborns’ orientation responses as related to quality of attachment in northern Germany. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 233–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassebrauck, M. (1997). Cognitions of relationship quality: A prototype analysis of their structure and consequences. Personal Relationships, 4, 163–185. doi:10.1111/pere.1997.4.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassebrauck, M., & Aron, A. (2001). Prototype matching in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1111–1122. doi:10.1177/0146167201279004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. G. (2000). Social relationships: The nature and function of relational schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 447–495. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. G. (2002). Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships, 9, 1–26. doi:10.1111/pere.2002.9.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol.1, pp. 137–230). New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy ( pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization ( pp. 27–48). Oxford, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shallcross, S. L., & Simpson, J. A. (2012). Trust and responsiveness in strain-test situations: A dyadic perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1031–1044. doi:10.1037/a0026829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1993). Adult romantic attachment: Theory and evidence. Advances in Personal Relationships, 4, 29–70.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, B. (2011). Disentangling prototypicality and social desirability: The case of the KNOWI task. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 454–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, B., & Horowitz, L. M. (2007). Can I count on you to be there for me? Individual differences in a knowledge structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 447–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, B., & Horowitz, L. M. (2010). The motive for support and the identification of responsive partners. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 342–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan, B., & Vicary, A. M. (2009). Who recognizes and chooses behaviors that are best for a relationship? The separate roles of knowledge, attachment, and motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 119–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1995). Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the Adult Attachment Interview. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 387–403. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III: Wechsler adult intelligence scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar