1,278
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Time perspective and volunteerism: The importance of focusing on the future

, &
Pages 334-349 | Received 24 Apr 2015, Accepted 31 Aug 2015, Published online: 11 Apr 2016

References

  • Arnocky, S., Milfont, T. L., & Nicol, J. (2014). Time perspective and sustainable behavior: Evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences. Environment and Behavior, 46, 556–582. doi:10.1177/0013916512474987
  • Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1516–1530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516
  • Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307–1310. doi:10.1126/science.1128317
  • D’Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo’s Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (STPI) -short form: An Italian study. Time & Society, 12, 333–347. doi:10.1177/0961463X030122010
  • Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Finkelstein, M. A. (2008). Volunteer satisfaction and volunteer action: A functional approach. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 36, 9–18. doi:10.2224/sbp.2008.36.1.9
  • Finkelstein, M. A. (2010). Individualism/collectivism: Implications for the volunteer process. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38, 445–452. doi:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.4.445
  • Finkelstien, M. A. (2009). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivational orientations and the volunteer process. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 653–658. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.010
  • Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 583–599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583
  • Grube, J., & Piliavin, J. A. (2000). Role-identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1108–1119. doi:10.1177/01461672002611007
  • Harber, K. D., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2003). Participant self-selection biases as a function of individual differences in time perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 255–264. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_08
  • Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion-orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1272–1287. doi:10.1177/0146167212449362
  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in the social sciences: Selected theoretical papers. New York, NY: Harper.
  • Liang, K., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22. doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
  • Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5–18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
  • Maki, A., Dwyer, P. C., & Snyder, M. (2015). Understanding AmeriCorps service: Perspectives from psychological theory and research on volunteerism. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/asap.12079
  • Maki, A., & Snyder, M. (in press). Appreciating similarities and differences between volunteer behaviors: Development of a volunteer interest typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.
  • Mann, T. (2001). Effects of future writing and optimism on health behaviors in HIV-infected women. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23, 26–33. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2301_5
  • Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2006). The relationship of time perspective to age, gender, and academic achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 271–289.
  • Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 325–334. doi:10.1080/00207594.2011.647029
  • Nickell, G. (1998, August). The helping attitudes scale. Paper presented at 106th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Okun, M. A., Barr, A., & Herzog, A. R. (1998). Motivation to volunteer by older adults: A test of competing measurement models. Psychology and Aging, 13, 608–621. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.608
  • Penner, L. A., Fritzsche, B. A., Craiger, J. P., & Freifeld, T. R. (1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In J. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (vol. 10, pp. 147–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Sainani, K. (n.d.). GEE and mixed models for longitudinal data. [PowerPoint document]. Retrieved from www.pitt.edu/~super4/33011-34001/33151-33161.ppt
  • Seijts, G. H. (1998). The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 154–168. doi:10.1080/00223989809599156
  • Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 121–139. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000026609.94841.2f
  • Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Osin, E., Milfont, T. L., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilgic, A., & Zimbardo, P. G., & 54 members of the International Time Perspective Research Project. (2014). A global look at time: A 24-country study of the equivalence of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. SAGE Open, 4, 1–12.
  • Snyder, M., & Dwyer, P. C. (2013). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In I. Weiner, H. A. Tennen, & J. M. Suls (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, volume 5: Personality and social psychology (pp. 467–485). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2008). Volunteerism: Social issues perspectives and social policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2, 1–36. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00009.x
  • Stolarski, M., & Fieulaine, N., & W. van Beek (Eds.). (2015). Time perspective theory; Review, research, and application. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
  • Thompson, C., Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1997). The development of future-oriented prudence and altruism in preschoolers. Cognitive Development, 12, 199–212. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90013-7
  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876–889. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.876
  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
  • Vecina, M. L., Chacón, F., Sueiro, M., & Barrón, A. (2012). Volunteer engagement: Does engagement predict the degree of satisfaction among new volunteers and the commitment of those who have been active longer? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61, 130–148. doi:10.1111/apps.2012.61.issue-1
  • Webb, D. J., Green, C. L., & Brashear, T. G. (2000). Development and validation of scales to measure attitudes influencing monetary donations to charitable organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 299–309. doi:10.1177/0092070300282010
  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
  • Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00113-X

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.